MBE Advance Access originally published online on April 25, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(6):945-954. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg101
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038
On the Nature of Gene Innovation: Duplication Patterns in Microbial Genomes
Department of Molecular Evolution, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Gene duplication is considered a major force in gene family expansion and gene innovation. As gene copies assume novel functions, they must avoid periods of neutrality or be deleted from the genome. Current opinions state that copies avoid neutrality through gene dosage effects. These copies are therefore selected from an early stage. This study concentrates on the flow of copies from recent duplication to gene innovation. We have studied 21 microbial genomes using amino acid divergence to describe paralog evolution in the long-term perspective. Five of these were studied in closer detail using nucleotide divergence for a shorter perspective. It was found that rates of duplication and deletion are high, with only a small fraction of duplications retained and apparently selected. This leads to a steady accumulation of paralogs, which seems to be of a similar magnitude in most of the genomes. Furthermore, it is found that genes of high expression level, as measured by their codon bias, are strongly underrepresented among the most recent duplications. Based on these and other observations, it is suggested that gene innovation is driven by amplification of weak, ancillary functions rather than strong, established functions.
Key Words: Paralog evolution gene duplication gene family expansion S. cerevisiae E. coli
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Tsuru and I. Kobayashi Multiple Genome Comparison within a Bacterial Species Reveals a Unit of Evolution Spanning Two Adjacent Genes in a Tandem Paralog Cluster Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2457 - 2473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Bergthorsson, D. I. Andersson, and J. R. Roth Ohno's dilemma: Evolution of new genes under continuous selection PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 17004 - 17009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mavromatis, C. K. Doyle, A. Lykidis, N. Ivanova, M. P. Francino, P. Chain, M. Shin, S. Malfatti, F. Larimer, A. Copeland, et al. The Genome of the Obligately Intracellular Bacterium Ehrlichia canis Reveals Themes of Complex Membrane Structure and Immune Evasion Strategies J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2006; 188(11): 4015 - 4023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Chapman, J. E. Bowers, F. A. Feltus, and A. H. Paterson Buffering of crucial functions by paleologous duplicated genes may contribute cyclicality to angiosperm genome duplication PNAS, February 21, 2006; 103(8): 2730 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Ciccarelli, C. von Mering, M. Suyama, E. D. Harrington, E. Izaurralde, and P. Bork Complex genomic rearrangements lead to novel primate gene function Genome Res., March 1, 2005; 15(3): 343 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Pettersson, D. I. Andersson, J. R. Roth, and O. G. Berg The Amplification Model for Adaptive Mutation: Simulations and Analysis Genetics, February 1, 2005; 169(2): 1105 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lynch and J. S. Conery Response to Comment on "The Origins of Genome Complexity" Science, November 5, 2004; 306(5698): 978b - 978b. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gonzalez, F. Casals, and A. Ruiz Duplicative and Conservative Transpositions of Larval serum protein 1 Genes in the Genus Drosophila Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 253 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





