Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on June 27, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/11/1833    most recent
msg196v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Navarro-Sabaté, A.
Right arrow Articles by Segarra, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Navarro-Sabaté, A.
Right arrow Articles by Segarra, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(11):1833-1843. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg196
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038

Excess of Nonsynonymous Polymorphism at Acph-1 in Different Gene Arrangements of Drosophila subobscura

Àurea Navarro-Sabaté1, Montserrat Aguadé and Carmen Segarra

Departament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain

E-mail: carme{at}porthos.bio.ub.es.

Nucleotide variation in the Acph-1 gene region was analyzed in a natural population of Drosophila subobscura from Bizerte (Tunisia). The lines studied differed in their gene arrangement for segment I of the O chromosome: 21 lines were O3+4+8, 21 were O3+4+23, and 3 were O3+4. According to chromosomal phylogenies, O3+4 is a central arrangement from which O3+4+8 and O3+4+23 originated. Strong genetic differentiation at Acph-1 was detected among the different arrangements, which is reflected in strong linkage disequilibrium between the variants at informative polymorphic sites and the type of arrangement. Estimates of silent nucleotide diversity are slightly lower within O3+4+23 ({pi}silent = 0.0166) than within O3+4+8 ({pi}silent = 0.0228) or O3+4 ({pi}silent = 0.0234). In contrast, nonsynonymous nucleotide diversity estimates (around 0.1%) are similar in the three arrangements. Most nonsynonymous rare variants are singletons, which results in highly significant Tajima's neutrality tests within the young O3+4+8 and O3+4+23 arrangements. This test is not significant for nonsynonymous mutations within a large Spanish O3+4 sample. In addition, a significant and marginally significant excess of nonsynonymous polymorphism was detected by the McDonald and Kreitman test within O3+4+23 and O3+4+8, respectively. This excess results in a rather high neutrality index (NI = 5.25) when both arrangements are jointly analyzed, in contrast to its value within the old O3+4 arrangement (NI = 1.74). The pattern of variation at Acph-1 within the young arrangements is unusual for nuclear genes and has the same characteristics previously detected in most genes of the mitochondrial genome. Assuming that most nonsynonymous mutations at Acph-1 are under weak negative selection, a smaller effective size of the young arrangements relative to O3+4 might explain the observed results. The relatively low frequency of O3+4+8 and O3+4+23 in the distribution area of D. subobscura, the more recent origin of these arrangements relative to O3+4 and the suppression of recombination in heterokaryotypes might contribute to the relatively small effective size of the young arrangements. Therefore, present results indicate that the differences in effective size and recombination caused by chromosomal arrangements are modulating nonsynonymous variation at Acph-1.

Key Words: Drosophila subobscuraAcph-1 gene • inversion polymorphism • nucleotide polymorphism • nonsynonymous polymorphism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Neiman and D. R Taylor
The causes of mutation accumulation in mitochondrial genomes
Proc R Soc B, April 7, 2009; 276(1660): 1201 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. E. Vallejos, G. Astua-Monge, V. Jones, T. R. Plyler, N. S. Sakiyama, and S. A. Mackenzie
Genetic and Molecular Characterization of the I Locus of Phaseolus vulgaris
Genetics, February 1, 2006; 172(2): 1229 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Munte, J. Rozas, M. Aguade, and C. Segarra
Chromosomal Inversion Polymorphism Leads to Extensive Genetic Structure: A Multilocus Survey in Drosophila subobscura
Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1573 - 1581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. L. Hughes
Evidence for Abundant Slightly Deleterious Polymorphisms in Bacterial Populations
Genetics, February 1, 2005; 169(2): 533 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Charlesworth
John Maynard Smith: January 6, 1920-April 19, 2004
Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1105 - 1109.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.