Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (54)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bollback, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bollback, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:1171-1180 (2002)
© 2002 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

Bayesian Model Adequacy and Choice in Phylogenetics

Jonathan P. Bollback

Department of Biology, University of Rochester

Bayesian inference is becoming a common statistical approach to phylogenetic estimation because, among other reasons, it allows for rapid analysis of large data sets with complex evolutionary models. Conveniently, Bayesian phylogenetic methods use currently available stochastic models of sequence evolution. However, as with other model-based approaches, the results of Bayesian inference are conditional on the assumed model of evolution: inadequate models (models that poorly fit the data) may result in erroneous inferences. In this article, I present a Bayesian phylogenetic method that evaluates the adequacy of evolutionary models using posterior predictive distributions. By evaluating a model's posterior predictive performance, an adequate model can be selected for a Bayesian phylogenetic study. Although I present a single test statistic that assesses the overall (global) performance of a phylogenetic model, a variety of test statistics can be tailored to evaluate specific features (local performance) of evolutionary models to identify sources failure. The method presented here, unlike the likelihood-ratio test and parametric bootstrap, accounts for uncertainty in the phylogeny and model parameters.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
P. G. Foster, C. J. Cox, and T. M. Embley
The primary divisions of life: a phylogenomic approach employing composition-heterogeneous methods
Phil Trans R Soc B, August 12, 2009; 364(1527): 2197 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. R. Moore and M. J. Donoghue
A Bayesian approach for evaluating the impact of historical events on rates of diversification
PNAS, March 17, 2009; 106(11): 4307 - 4312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
J. M. Brown and R. ElDabaje
PuMA: Bayesian analysis of partitioned (and unpartitioned) model adequacy
Bioinformatics, February 15, 2009; 25(4): 537 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. J. Cox, P. G. Foster, R. P. Hirt, S. R. Harris, and T. M. Embley
The archaebacterial origin of eukaryotes
PNAS, December 23, 2008; 105(51): 20356 - 20361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
N. Rodrigue, N. Lartillot, and H. Philippe
Bayesian Comparisons of Codon Substitution Models
Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1579 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Rabeling, J. M. Brown, and M. Verhaagh
Newly discovered sister lineage sheds light on early ant evolution
PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 14913 - 14917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Blanquart and N. Lartillot
A Site- and Time-Heterogeneous Model of Amino Acid Replacement
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 842 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
J. Ripplinger and J. Sullivan
Does Choice in Model Selection Affect Maximum Likelihood Analysis?
Syst Biol, February 1, 2008; 57(1): 76 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. White, S. Hills, R Gaddam, B. Holland, and D. Penny
Treeness Triangles: Visualizing the Loss of Phylogenetic Signal
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2029 - 2039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
C. T. T. Edwards, E. C. Holmes, O. G. Pybus, D. J. Wilson, R. P. Viscidi, E. J. Abrams, R. E. Phillips, and A. J. Drummond
Evolution of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope Gene Is Dominated by Purifying Selection
Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1441 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
F. Ababneh, L. S. Jermiin, C. Ma, and J. Robinson
Matched-pairs tests of homogeneity with applications to homologous nucleotide sequences
Bioinformatics, May 15, 2006; 22(10): 1225 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
N. Lartillot and H. Philippe
Computing Bayes Factors Using Thermodynamic Integration
Syst Biol, April 1, 2006; 55(2): 195 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
D. J. Wilson and G. McVean
Estimating Diversifying Selection and Functional Constraint in the Presence of Recombination
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1411 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
L. J. Revell, L. J. Harmon, and R. E. Glor
Under-parameterized Model of Sequence Evolution Leads to Bias in the Estimation of Diversification Rates from Molecular Phylogenies
Syst Biol, December 1, 2005; 54(6): 973 - 983.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
K. Roelants and F. Bossuyt
Archaeobatrachian Paraphyly and Pangaean Diversification of Crown-Group Frogs
Syst Biol, February 1, 2005; 54(1): 111 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
D. Pol
Empirical Problems of the Hierarchical Likelihood Ratio Test for Model Selection
Syst Biol, December 1, 2004; 53(6): 949 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Liu, T. Wilson, and J. W. Hastings
Molecular evolution of dinoflagellate luciferases, enzymes with three catalytic domains in a single polypeptide
PNAS, November 23, 2004; 101(47): 16555 - 16560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
D. Posada and T. R. Buckley
Model Selection and Model Averaging in Phylogenetics: Advantages of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Approaches Over Likelihood Ratio Tests
Syst Biol, October 1, 2004; 53(5): 793 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. M. Krishnan, H. Seligmann, C.-B. Stewart, A. P. J. de Koning, and D. D. Pollock
Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction in Primate Mitochondrial DNA: Compositional Bias and Effect on Functional Inference
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1871 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
C. A. Matthee, B. J. Van Vuuren, D. Bell, and T. J. Robinson
A Molecular Supermatrix of the Rabbits and Hares (Leporidae) Allows for the Identification of Five Intercontinental Exchanges During the Miocene
Syst Biol, June 1, 2004; 53(3): 433 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
P. G. Foster
Modeling Compositional Heterogeneity
Syst Biol, June 1, 2004; 53(3): 485 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
A. R. Lemmon and E. C. Moriarty
The Importance of Proper Model Assumption in Bayesian Phylogenetics
Syst Biol, April 1, 2004; 53(2): 265 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
J. A. A. Nylander, F. Ronquist, J. P. Huelsenbeck, and J. Nieves-Aldrey
Bayesian Phylogenetic Analysis of Combined Data
Syst Biol, February 1, 2004; 53(1): 47 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.