Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:1464-1473 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Shared Nucleotide Composition Biases Among Species and Their Impact on Phylogenetic Reconstructions of the Drosophilidae
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California at Irvine
Misión Biológica de Galicia (CSIC), Pontevedra, Spain
Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia (CSIC), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Compositional changes are a major feature of genome evolution. Overlooking nucleotide composition differences among sequences can seriously mislead phylogenetic reconstructions. Large compositional variation exists among the members of the family Drosophilidae. Until now, however, base composition differences have been largely neglected in the formulations of the nucleotide substitution process used to reconstruct the phylogeny of this important group of species. The present study adopts a maximum-likelihood framework of phylogenetic inference in order to analyze five nuclear gene regions and shows that (1) the pattern of compositional variation in the Drosophilidae does not match the phylogeny of the species; (2) accounting for the heterogeneous GC content with Galtier and Gouy's nucleotide substitution model leads to a tree that differs in significant aspects from the tree inferred when the nucleotide composition differences are ignored, even though both phylogenetic hypotheses attain strong nodal support in the bootstrap analyses; and (3) the LogDet distance correction cannot completely overcome the distorting effects of the compositional variation that exists among the species of the Drosophilidae. Our analyses confidently place the Chymomyza genus as an outgroup closer than the genus Scaptodrosophila to the Drosophila genus and conclusively support the monophyly of the Sophophora subgenus.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. C. Sheffield, H. Song, S. L. Cameron, and M. F. Whiting Nonstationary Evolution and Compositional Heterogeneity in Beetle Mitochondrial Phylogenomics Syst Biol, August 1, 2009; 58(4): 381 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Gowri-Shankar and M. Rattray A Reversible Jump Method for Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference with a Nonhomogeneous Substitution Model Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 1286 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Gruber, R. S. Voss, and S. A. Jansa Base-Compositional Heterogeneity in the RAG1 Locus among Didelphid Marsupials: Implications for Phylogenetic Inference and the Evolution of GC Content Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 83 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Boussau and M. Gouy Efficient Likelihood Computations with Nonreversible Models of Evolution Syst Biol, October 1, 2006; 55(5): 756 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-S. Lin, J. K. Byrnes, J.-K. Hwang, and W.-H. Li Codon-usage bias versus gene conversion in the evolution of yeast duplicate genes PNAS, September 26, 2006; 103(39): 14412 - 14416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Galtier, E. Bazin, and N. Bierne GC-Biased Segregation of Noncoding Polymorphisms in Drosophila Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 221 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rubinoff and B. S. Holland Between Two Extremes: Mitochondrial DNA is neither the Panacea nor the Nemesis of Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Inference Syst Biol, December 1, 2005; 54(6): 952 - 961. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hassanin, N. Leger, and J. Deutsch Evidence for Multiple Reversals of Asymmetric Mutational Constraints during the Evolution of the Mitochondrial Genome of Metazoa, and Consequences for Phylogenetic Inferences Syst Biol, April 1, 2005; 54(2): 277 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Herbeck, P. H. Degnan, and J. J. Wernegreen Nonhomogeneous Model of Sequence Evolution Indicates Independent Origins of Primary Endosymbionts Within the Enterobacteriales ({gamma}-Proteobacteria) Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 520 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Townsend, A. Larson, E. Louis, and J. R. Macey Molecular Phylogenetics of Squamata: The Position of Snakes, Amphisbaenians, and Dibamids, and the Root of the Squamate Tree Syst Biol, October 1, 2004; 53(5): 735 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Heredia, E. L. S. Loreto, and V. L. S. Valente Complex Evolution of gypsy in Drosophilid Species Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1831 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y.W. Ho and L. S. Jermiin Tracing the Decay of the Historical Signal in Biological Sequence Data Syst Biol, August 1, 2004; 53(4): 623 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Jermiin, S. Y.W. Ho, F. Ababneh, J. Robinson, and A. W.D. Larkum The Biasing Effect of Compositional Heterogeneity on Phylogenetic Estimates May be Underestimated Syst Biol, August 1, 2004; 53(4): 638 - 643. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Foster Modeling Compositional Heterogeneity Syst Biol, June 1, 2004; 53(3): 485 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rodriguez-Trelles, R. Tarrio, and F. J. Ayala Convergent neofunctionalization by positive Darwinian selection after ancient recurrent duplications of the xanthine dehydrogenase gene PNAS, November 11, 2003; 100(23): 13413 - 13417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tarrio, F. Rodriguez-Trelles, and F. J. Ayala A new Drosophila spliceosomal intron position is common in plants PNAS, May 27, 2003; 100(11): 6580 - 6583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Rosenberg and S. Kumar Heterogeneity of Nucleotide Frequencies Among Evolutionary Lineages and Phylogenetic Inference Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2003; 20(4): 610 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schmitz, M. Ohme, B. Suryobroto, and H. Zischler The Colugo (Cynocephalus variegatus, Dermoptera): The Primates' Gliding Sister? Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2308 - 2312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tamura and S. Kumar Evolutionary Distance Estimation Under Heterogeneous Substitution Pattern Among Lineages Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2002; 19(10): 1727 - 1736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Wright, B. Lauga, and D. Charlesworth Rates and Patterns of Molecular Evolution in Inbred and Outbred Arabidopsis Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2002; 19(9): 1407 - 1420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rodriguez-Trelles, R. Tarrio, and F. J. Ayala Erratic overdispersion of three molecular clocks: GPDH, SOD, and XDH PNAS, September 5, 2001; (2001) 201392198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rodriguez-Trelles, R. Tarrio, and F. J. Ayala Erratic overdispersion of three molecular clocks: GPDH, SOD, and XDH PNAS, September 25, 2001; 98(20): 11405 - 11410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



