Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bachtrog, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schlötterer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bachtrog, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schlötterer, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:1277-1285 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


Regular Article

Microsatellite Variability Differs Between Dinucleotide Repeat Motifs—Evidence from Drosophila melanogaster

Doris Bachtrog, Martin Agis, Marianne Imhof and Christian Schlötterer2,

Institut für Tierzucht und Genetik, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Recently, the use of microsatellites as genetic markers has become very popular. While their evolutionary dynamics are not yet fully understood, the emerging picture is that several factors are influencing microsatellite mutation rates. Recent experiments demonstrated a significant effect of repeat motif length on microsatellite mutation rates. Here, we studied the influence of the base composition of the microsatellite. Forty-two microsatellite loci on the second chromosome with the three most abundant dinucleotide repeat motifs (TC/AG, AT/TA, GT/CA) were characterized for six different Drosophila melanogaster populations. Applying ANOVA to the variance in repeat number, we found a significant influence of repeat motif on microsatellite variability. Calculating relative mutation rates, GT/CA appears to have the highest mutation rate, and AT/TA appears to have the lowest. Similar differences in mutation rates were obtained by an alternative method which estimates microsatellite mutation rates from their genomic length distribution.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
Y. D. Kelkar, S. Tyekucheva, F. Chiaromonte, and K. D. Makova
The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution
Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 30 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. D. Jensen, V. L. Bauer DuMont, A. B. Ashmore, A. Gutierrez, and C. F. Aquadro
Patterns of Sequence Variability and Divergence at the diminutive Gene Region of Drosophila melanogaster: Complex Patterns Suggest an Ancestral Selective Sweep
Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 1071 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. Wiehe, V. Nolte, D. Zivkovic, and C. Schlotterer
Identification of Selective Sweeps Using a Dynamically Adjusted Number of Linked Microsatellites
Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 207 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. B. DuMont and C. F. Aquadro
Multiple Signatures of Positive Selection Downstream of Notch on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 639 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Xu, R. Chakraborty, and Y.-X. Fu
Mutation Rate Variation at Human Dinucleotide Microsatellites
Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 305 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P. Almeida and C. Penha-Goncalves
Long Perfect Dinucleotide Repeats Are Typical of Vertebrates, Show Motif Preferences and Size Convergence
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1226 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. V. Symonds and A. M. Lloyd
An Analysis of Microsatellite Loci in Arabidopsis thaliana: Mutational Dynamics and Application
Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1475 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
D. Dieringer and C. Schlotterer
Two Distinct Modes of Microsatellite Mutation Processes: Evidence From the Complete Genomic Sequences of Nine Species
Genome Res., October 1, 2003; 13(10): 2242 - 2251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. L. Ross, K. A. Dyer, T. Erez, S. J. Miller, J. Jaenike, and T. A. Markow
Rapid Divergence of Microsatellite Abundance Among Species of Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2003; 20(7): 1143 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. I. Tenaillon, M. C. Sawkins, L. K. Anderson, S. M. Stack, J. Doebley, and B. S. Gaut
Patterns of Diversity and Recombination Along Chromosome 1 of Maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.)
Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1401 - 1413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y. Vigouroux, J. S. Jaqueth, Y. Matsuoka, O. S. Smith, W. D. Beavis, J. S. C. Smith, and J. Doebley
Rate and Pattern of Mutation at Microsatellite Loci in Maize
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2002; 19(8): 1251 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Kauer, B. Zangerl, D. Dieringer, and C. Schlotterer
Chromosomal Patterns of Microsatellite Variability Contrast Sharply in African and Non-African Populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, January 1, 2002; 160(1): 247 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
A. G. Clark
The Search for Meaning in Noncoding DNA
Genome Res., August 1, 2001; 11(8): 1319 - 1320.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. Schlotterer and B. Harr
Drosophila virilis Has Long and Highly Polymorphic Microsatellites
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2000; 17(11): 1641 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.