Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:1854-1858 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
ARTICLE |
Assessing an Unknown Evolutionary Process: Effect of Increasing Site-Specific Knowledge Through Taxon Addition
*Theoretical Biology and Biophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico;
and
Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge
Assessment of the evolutionary process is crucial for understanding the effect of protein structure and function on sequence evolution and for many other analyses in molecular evolution. Here, we used simulations to study how taxon sampling affects accuracy of parameter estimation and topological inference in the absence of branch length asymmetry. With maximum-likelihood analysis, we find that adding taxa dramatically improves both support for the evolutionary model and accurate assessment of its parameters when compared with increasing the sequence length. Using a method we call "doppelgänger trees," we distinguish the contributions of two sources of improved topological inference: greater knowledge about internal nodes and greater knowledge of site-specific rate parameters. Surprisingly, highly significant support for the correct general model does not lead directly to improved topological inference. Instead, substantial improvement occurs only with accurate assessment of the evolutionary process at individual sites. Although these results are based on a simplified model of the evolutionary process, they indicate that in general, assuming processes are not independent and identically distributed among sites, more extensive sampling of taxonomic biodiversity will greatly improve analytical results in many current sequence data sets with moderate sequence lengths.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Campbell and F.-J. Lapointe The Use and Validity of Composite Taxa in Phylogenetic Analysis Syst Biol, December 1, 2009; 58(6): 560 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. San Mauro, D. J. Gower, T. Massingham, M. Wilkinson, R. Zardoya, and J. A. Cotton Experimental Design in Caecilian Systematics: Phylogenetic Information of Mitochondrial Genomes and Nuclear rag1 Syst Biol, August 18, 2009; (2009) syp043v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Geuten, T. Massingham, P. Darius, E. Smets, and N. Goldman Experimental Design Criteria in Phylogenetics: Where to Add Taxa Syst Biol, August 1, 2007; 56(4): 609 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Townsend Profiling Phylogenetic Informativeness Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 222 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Goldstein and D. D. Pollock Observations of Amino Acid Gain and Loss during Protein Evolution Are Explained by Statistical Bias Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 1444 - 1449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Hedtke, T. M. Townsend, and D. M. Hillis Resolution of Phylogenetic Conflict in Large Data Sets by Increased Taxon Sampling Syst Biol, June 1, 2006; 55(3): 522 - 529. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mateiu and B. Rannala Inferring Complex DNA Substitution Processes on Phylogenies Using Uniformization and Data Augmentation Syst Biol, April 1, 2006; 55(2): 259 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. Eick, D. S. Jacobs, and C. A. Matthee A Nuclear DNA Phylogenetic Perspective on the Evolution of Echolocation and Historical Biogeography of Extant Bats (Chiroptera) Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2005; 22(9): 1869 - 1886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. DeBry The Systematic Component of Phylogenetic Error as a Function of Taxonomic Sampling Under Parsimony Syst Biol, June 1, 2005; 54(3): 432 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Z. Raina, J. J. Faith, T. R. Disotell, H. Seligmann, C.-B. Stewart, and D. D. Pollock Evolution of base-substitution gradients in primate mitochondrial genomes Genome Res., May 1, 2005; 15(5): 665 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Krishnan, H. Seligmann, C.-B. Stewart, A. P. J. de Koning, and D. D. Pollock Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction in Primate Mitochondrial DNA: Compositional Bias and Effect on Functional Inference Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1871 - 1883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Peintner, J.-M. Moncalvo, and R. Vilgalys Toward a better understanding of the infrageneric relationships in Cortinarius (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) Mycologia, September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1042 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Simmons, K. M. Pickett, and M. Miya How Meaningful Are Bayesian Support Values? Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 188 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Faith and D. D. Pollock Likelihood Analysis of Asymmetrical Mutation Bias Gradients in Vertebrate Mitochondrial Genomes Genetics, October 1, 2003; 165(2): 735 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Pollock, J. A. Eisen, N. A. Doggett, and M. P. Cummings A Case for Evolutionary Genomics and the Comprehensive Examination of Sequence Biodiversity Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2000; 17(12): 1776 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




