Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takezaki, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takezaki, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 15, 727-737, Copyright © 1998 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Tie trees generated by distance methods of phylogenetic reconstruction

N Takezaki
National Institute of Genetics, Shizuoka, Japan. ntakezak@lab.nig.ac.jp

In examining genetic data in recent publications, Backeljau et al. showed cases in which two or more different trees (tie trees) were constructed from a single data set for the neighbor-joining (NJ) method and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). However, it is still unclear how often and under what conditions tie trees are generated. Therefore, I examined these problems by computer simulation. Examination of cases in which tie trees occur shows that tie trees can appear when no substitutions occur along some interior branch(es) on a tree. However, even when some substitutions occur along interior branches, tie trees can appear by chance if parallel or backward substitutions occur at some sites. The simulation results showed that tie trees occur relatively frequently for sequences with low divergence levels or with small numbers of sites. For such data, UPGMA sometimes produced tie trees quite frequently, whereas tie trees for the NJ method were generally rare. In the simulation, bootstrap values for clusters (tie clusters) that differed among tie trees were mostly low (< 60%). With a small probability, relatively high bootstrap values (at most 70%-80%) appeared for tie clusters. The bias of the bootstrap values caused by an input order of sequence can be avoided if one of the different paths in the cycles of making an NJ or UPGMA tree is chosen at random in each bootstrap replication.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
R. Meier, K. Shiyang, G. Vaidya, and P. K. L. Ng
DNA Barcoding and Taxonomy in Diptera: A Tale of High Intraspecific Variability and Low Identification Success
Syst Biol, October 1, 2006; 55(5): 715 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
V. Arnau, S. Mars, and I. Marín
Iterative Cluster Analysis of Protein Interaction Data
Bioinformatics, February 1, 2005; 21(3): 364 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.