Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (107)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petrov, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hartl, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petrov, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hartl, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 15, 293-302, Copyright © 1998 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups

DA Petrov and DL Hartl
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. dpetrov@oeb.harvard.edu

We recently proposed that patterns of evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements can be used to study patterns of spontaneous mutation. Transposition of non-LTR retrotransposable elements commonly results in creation of 5' truncated, "dead-on-arrival" copies. These inactive copies are effectively pseudogenes and, according to the neutral theory, their molecular evolution ought to reflect rates and patterns of spontaneous mutation. Maximum parsimony can be used to separate the evolution of active lineages of a non-LTR element from the fate of the "dead-on-arrival" insertions and to directly assess the relative frequencies of different types of spontaneous mutations. We applied this approach using a non-LTR element, Helena, in the Drosophila virilis group and have demonstrated a surprisingly high incidence of large deletions and the virtual absence of insertions. Based on these results, we suggested that Drosophila in general may exhibit a high rate of spontaneous large deletions and have hypothesized that such a high rate of DNA loss may help to explain the puzzling dearth of bona fide pseudogenes in Drosophila. We also speculated that variation in the rate of spontaneous deletion may contribute to the divergence of genome size in different taxa by affecting the amount of superfluous "junk" DNA such as, for example, pseudogenes or long introns. In this paper, we extend our analysis to the D. melanogaster subgroup, which last shared a common ancestor with the D. virilis group approximately 40 MYA. In a different region of the same transposable element, Helena, we demonstrate that inactive copies accumulate deletions in species of the D. melanogaster subgroup at a rate very similar to that of the D. virilis group. These results strongly suggest that the high rate of DNA loss is a general feature of Drosophila and not a peculiar property of a particular stretch of DNA in a particular species group.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Gen Biol EvolHome page
C.-H. Kuo and H. Ochman
Deletional Bias across the Three Domains of Life
Gen Biol Evol, July 10, 2009; 2009(0): 145 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
S. W. Schaeffer, A. Bhutkar, B. F. McAllister, M. Matsuda, L. M. Matzkin, P. M. O'Grady, C. Rohde, V. L. S. Valente, M. Aguade, W. W. Anderson, et al.
Polytene Chromosomal Maps of 11 Drosophila Species: The Order of Genomic Scaffolds Inferred From Genetic and Physical Maps
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1601 - 1655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y.-H. Loh, S. Brenner, and B. Venkatesh
Investigation of Loss and Gain of Introns in the Compact Genomes of Pufferfishes (Fugu and Tetraodon)
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 526 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
G. Bosco, P. Campbell, J. T. Leiva-Neto, and T. A. Markow
Analysis of Drosophila Species Genome Size and Satellite DNA Content Reveals Significant Differences Among Strains as Well as Between Species
Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1277 - 1290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Casillas, A. Barbadilla, and C. M. Bergman
Purifying Selection Maintains Highly Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2222 - 2234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. M. Bergman and D. Bensasson
Recent LTR retrotransposon insertion contrasts with waves of non-LTR insertion since speciation in Drosophila melanogaster
PNAS, July 3, 2007; 104(27): 11340 - 11345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
J. Kim and S. Sinha
Indelign: a probabilistic framework for annotation of insertions and deletions in a multiple alignment
Bioinformatics, February 1, 2007; 23(3): 289 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. C. Presgraves
Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Stoltzfus
Mutation-Biased Adaptation in a Protein NK Model
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1852 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
D. L. Halligan and P. D. Keightley
Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison
Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 875 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. L. Crainey, C. F. Garvey, and C. A. Malcolm
The Origin and Evolution of Mosquito APE Retroposons
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2005; 22(11): 2190 - 2197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. J. Begun and H. A. Lindfors
Rapid Evolution of Genomic Acp Complement in the melanogaster Subgroup of Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 2010 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Sinha and E. D. Siggia
Sequence Turnover and Tandem Repeats in cis-Regulatory Modules in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 874 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
L. Ometto, W. Stephan, and D. De Lorenzo
Insertion/Deletion and Nucleotide Polymorphism Data Reveal Constraints in Drosophila melanogaster Introns and Intergenic Regions
Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1521 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
S. Richards, Y. Liu, B. R. Bettencourt, P. Hradecky, S. Letovsky, R. Nielsen, K. Thornton, M. J. Hubisz, R. Chen, R. P. Meisel, et al.
Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: Chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution
Genome Res., January 1, 2005; 15(1): 1 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
T. R. Bhangale, M. J. Rieder, R. J. Livingston, and D. A. Nickerson
Comprehensive identification and characterization of diallelic insertion-deletion polymorphisms in 330 human candidate genes
Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 59 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
T. Wicker, J. S. Robertson, S. R. Schulze, F. A. Feltus, V. Magrini, J. A. Morrison, E. R. Mardis, R. K. Wilson, D. G. Peterson, A. H. Paterson, et al.
The repetitive landscape of the chicken genome
Genome Res., January 1, 2005; 15(1): 126 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
L. Gomez-Valero, A. Latorre, and F. J. Silva
The Evolutionary Fate of Nonfunctional DNA in the Bacterial Endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2004; 21(11): 2172 - 2181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
A. Palsson, A. Rouse, R. Riley-Berger, I. Dworkin, and G. Gibson
Nucleotide Variation in the Egfr Locus of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1199 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
J. Ma, K. M. Devos, and J. L. Bennetzen
Analyses of LTR-Retrotransposon Structures Reveal Recent and Rapid Genomic DNA Loss in Rice
Genome Res., May 1, 2004; 14(5): 860 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
A. Prachumwat, L. DeVincentis, and M. F. Palopoli
Intron Size Correlates Positively With Recombination Rate in Caenorhabditis elegans
Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1585 - 1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Tamura, S. Subramanian, and S. Kumar
Temporal Patterns of Fruit Fly (Drosophila) Evolution Revealed by Mutation Clocks
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 36 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
J. Parsch
Selective Constraints on Intron Evolution in Drosophila
Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1843 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
M. Lynch and J. S. Conery
The Origins of Genome Complexity
Science, November 21, 2003; 302(5649): 1401 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. A. Petrov, Y. T. Aminetzach, J. C. Davis, D. Bensasson, and A. E. Hirsh
Size Matters: Non-LTR Retrotransposable Elements and Ectopic Recombination in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2003; 20(6): 880 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. Reiss, H. Quesneville, D. Nouaud, O. Andrieu, and D. Anxolabehere
Hoppel, a P-like Element Without Introns: a P-Element Ancestral Structure or a Retrotranscription Derivative?
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2003; 20(6): 869 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
D. E. Neafsey and S. R. Palumbi
Genome Size Evolution in Pufferfish: A Comparative Analysis of Diodontid and Tetraodontid Pufferfish Genomes
Genome Res., May 1, 2003; 13(5): 821 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
H. Sundstrom, M. T. Webster, and H. Ellegren
Is the Rate of Insertion and Deletion Mutation Male Biased?: Molecular Evolutionary Analysis of Avian and Primate Sex Chromosome Sequences
Genetics, May 1, 2003; 164(1): 259 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. P. Blumenstiel, D. L. Hartl, and E. R. Lozovsky
Patterns of Insertion and Deletion in Contrasting Chromatin Domains
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2211 - 2225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
S. E. Ptak and D. A. Petrov
How Intron Splicing Affects the Deletion and Insertion Profile in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1233 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
K. M. Devos, J. K.M. Brown, and J. L. Bennetzen
Genome Size Reduction through Illegitimate Recombination Counteracts Genome Expansion in Arabidopsis
Genome Res., July 1, 2002; 12(7): 1075 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
J. M. Comeron and M. Kreitman
Population, Evolutionary and Genomic Consequences of Interference Selection
Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 389 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Karlin, L. Brocchieri, A. Bergman, J. Mrazek, and A. J. Gentles
Amino acid runs in eukaryotic proteomes and disease associations
PNAS, January 8, 2002; 99(1): 333 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
M. Lynch, M. O'Hely, B. Walsh, and A. Force
The Probability of Preservation of a Newly Arisen Gene Duplicate
Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1789 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Carr, J. R. Soloway, T. E. Robinson, and J. F. Y. Brookfield
An Investigation of the Cause of Low Variability on the Fourth Chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2260 - 2269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
C. M. Bergman and M. Kreitman
Analysis of Conserved Noncoding DNA in Drosophila Reveals Similar Constraints in Intergenic and Intronic Sequences
Genome Res., August 1, 2001; 11(8): 1335 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. O. Andersson and S. G. E. Andersson
Pseudogenes, Junk DNA, and the Dynamics of Rickettsia Genomes
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2001; 18(5): 829 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. Blesa, M. Gandia, and M. J. Martinez-Sebastian
Distribution of the bilbo Non-LTR Retrotransposon in Drosophilidae and its Evolution in the Drosophila obscura Species Group
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2001; 18(4): 585 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
H.-P. Yang, A. Y. Tanikawa, W. A. Van Voorhies, J. C. Silva, and A. S. Kondrashov
Whole-Genome Effects of Ethyl Methanesulfonate-Induced Mutation on Nine Quantitative Traits in Outbred Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, March 1, 2001; 157(3): 1257 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
H.-P. Yang, A. Y. Tanikawa, and A. S. Kondrashov
Molecular Nature of 11 Spontaneous de Novo Mutations in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, March 1, 2001; 157(3): 1285 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. Bensasson, D. A. Petrov, D.-X. Zhang, D. L. Hartl, and G. M. Hewitt
Genomic Gigantism: DNA Loss Is Slow in Mountain Grasshoppers
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2001; 18(2): 246 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
J. M. Comeron and M. Kreitman
The Correlation Between Intron Length and Recombination in Drosophila: Dynamic Equilibrium Between Mutational and Selective Forces
Genetics, November 1, 2000; 156(3): 1175 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. Harr, B. Zangerl, and C. Schlotterer
Removal of Microsatellite Interruptions by DNA Replication Slippage: Phylogenetic Evidence from Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2000; 17(7): 1001 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Fedoroff
Transposons and genome evolution in plants
PNAS, June 20, 2000; 97(13): 7002 - 7007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. C. d. Q. Robin, R. J. Russell, D. J. Cutler, and J. G. Oakeshott
The Evolution of an {alpha}-Esterase Pseudogene Inactivated in the Drosophila melanogaster Lineage
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2000; 17(4): 563 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
D. A. Petrov, T. A. Sangster, J. S. Johnston, D. L. Hartl, and K. L. Shaw
Evidence for DNA Loss as a Determinant of Genome Size
Science, February 11, 2000; 287(5455): 1060 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
H. M. Robertson
The Large srh Family of Chemoreceptor Genes in Caenorhabditis Nematodes Reveals Processes of Genome Evolution Involving Large Duplications and Deletions and Intron Gains and Losses
Genome Res., February 1, 2000; 10(2): 192 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
I. Colson and D. B. Goldstein
Evidence for Complex Mutations at Microsatellite Loci in Drosophila
Genetics, June 1, 1999; 152(2): 617 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. A. Petrov and D. L. Hartl
Patterns of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila and mammalian genomes
PNAS, February 16, 1999; 96(4): 1475 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.