Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Rosa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Labedan, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Rosa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Labedan, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 15, 17-27, Copyright © 1998 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The evolutionary relationships between the two bacteria Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae and their putative last common ancestor

R de Rosa and B Labedan
Institut de Genetique et Microbiologie, Universite Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.

We have tried to approach the nature of the last common ancestor to Haemophilus influenzae and Escherichia coli and to determine how each bacterium could have diverged from this putative organism. The approach used was exhaustive analysis of the homologous proteins coded by genes present in these bacteria, using as criteria for sequence relatedness an alignment of at least 80 amino acid residues and a PAM distance (number of accepted point mutations per 100 residues separating two sequences) below 250. Evolutionarily significant similarities were found between 1,345 H. influenzae proteins (85% of the total genome) and 3,058 E. coli. proteins (75% of the total genome), many of them belonging to families of various sizes (from 666 doublets to 35 large groups of more than 10 members). Nearly all the genes found by this approach to be duplicated in both bacteria were already duplicated in their last common ancestor. This was deduced from (1) the comparison of the respective distributions of evolutionary distances between orthologs (genes separated only by speciation events) and paralogs (genes duplicated in the same genome) and (2) the analysis of the phylogenetic trees reconstructed for each family of paralogs containing at least two members belonging to each bacterium. The distributions of the different categories of homologs show a significant loss of paralogous genes in H. influenzae (reduction proportional to the genome size), of many sequences which are still present in one copy in E. coli, and of some entire gene families. Phylogenetic trees also confirmed this recent loss of paralogous genes in H. influenzae. Thus, the genome size of the last common ancestor of these two bacteria would have been close to that of present-day E. coli, and the evolution of H. influenzae toward a parasitic life led to an important decrease in its genome size by some mechanism of streamlining. During this recent evolution, the memory of the gene order present in the last common ancestor has been blurred, but a few short conserved chromosomal fragments can still be detected in present-day E. coli and H. influenzae.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
V. Stewart and P. J. Bledsoe
Fnr-, NarP- and NarL-Dependent Regulation of Transcription Initiation from the Haemophilus influenzae Rd napF (Periplasmic Nitrate Reductase) Promoter in Escherichia coli K-12
J. Bacteriol., October 15, 2005; 187(20): 6928 - 6935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. S. Tchufistova, A. V. Komarova, and I. V. Boni
A key role for the mRNA leader structure in translational control of ribosomal protein S1 synthesis in {gamma}-proteobacteria
Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2003; 31(23): 6996 - 7002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
C. Goffin and J.-M. Ghuysen
Biochemistry and Comparative Genomics of SxxK Superfamily Acyltransferases Offer a Clue to the Mycobacterial Paradox: Presence of Penicillin-Susceptible Target Proteins versus Lack of Efficiency of Penicillin as Therapeutic Agent
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2002; 66(4): 702 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
S. Le Bouder-Langevin, I. Capron-Montaland, R. De Rosa, and B. Labedan
A Strategy to Retrieve the Whole Set of Protein Modules in Microbial Proteomes
Genome Res., December 1, 2002; 12(12): 1961 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
M. L. Kotewicz, B. Li, D. D. Levy, J. E. LeClerc, A. W. Shifflet, and T. A. Cebula
Evolution of multi-gene segments in the mutS-rpoS intergenic region of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2
Microbiology, August 1, 2002; 148(8): 2531 - 2540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
E. Ibañez, E. Campos, L. Baldoma, J. Aguilar, and J. Badia
Regulation of Expression of the yiaKLMNOPQRS Operon for Carbohydrate Utilization in Escherichia coli: Involvement of the Main Transcriptional Factors
J. Bacteriol., August 15, 2000; 182(16): 4617 - 4624.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
O. Lecompte, R. Ripp, V. Puzos-Barbe, S. Duprat, R. Heilig, J. Dietrich, J.-C. Thierry, and O. Poch
Genome Evolution at the Genus Level: Comparison of Three Complete Genomes of Hyperthermophilic Archaea
Genome Res., June 1, 2001; 11(6): 981 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
B. Snel, P. Bork, and M. A. Huynen
Genomes in Flux: The Evolution of Archaeal and Proteobacterial Gene Content
Genome Res., January 1, 2002; 12(1): 17 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.