Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (74)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellegren, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellegren, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, B. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 14, 854-860, Copyright © 1997 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Microsatellite evolution--a reciprocal study of repeat lengths at homologous loci in cattle and sheep

H Ellegren, S Moore, N Robinson, K Byrne, W Ward and BC Sheldon
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. hans.ellegren@bmc.uu.se

The application of microsatellites in evolutionary studies requires an understanding of the patterns governing their evolution in different species. The finding that homologous microsatellite loci are longer, i.e., containing more repeat units, in human and in other primates has been taken as evidence for directional microsatellite evolution and for a difference in the rate of evolution between species. However, it has been argued that this finding is an inevitable consequence of biased selection of longer-than-average microsatellites in human, because cloning procedures are adopted to generate polymorphic and, hence, long markers. As a test of this hypothesis, we conducted a reciprocal comparison of the lengths of microsatellite loci in cattle and sheep using markers derived from the bovine genome as well as the ovine genome. In both cases, amplification products were longer in the focal species, and loci were also more polymorphic in the species from which they were originally cloned. The crossing pattern that we found suggests that interspecific length differences detected at homologous microsatellite loci are the result of biased selection of loci associated with cloning procedures. Hence, comparisons of microsatellite evolution between species are flawed unless they are based on reciprocal analyses or on genuinely random selection of loci with respect to repeat length.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. Brandstrom and H. Ellegren
Genome-wide analysis of microsatellite polymorphism in chicken circumventing the ascertainment bias
Genome Res., June 1, 2008; 18(6): 881 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Kayser, E. J. Vowles, D. Kappei, and W. Amos
Microsatellite Length Differences Between Humans and Chimpanzees at Autosomal Loci Are Not Found at Equivalent Haploid Y Chromosomal Loci
Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2179 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. J. Vowles and W. Amos
Quantifying Ascertainment Bias and Species-Specific Length Differences in Human and Chimpanzee Microsatellites Using Genome Sequences
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 598 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
P. C. WATTS, J. G. C. HAMILTON, R. D. WARD, H. A. NOYES, N. A. SOUZA, S. J. KEMP, M. D. FELICIANGELI, R. BRAZIL, and R. D. C. MAINGON
MALE SEX PHEROMONES AND THE PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE OF THE LUTZOMYIA LONGIPALPIS SPECIES COMPLEX (DIPTERA: PSYCHODIDAE) FROM BRAZIL AND VENEZUELA
Am J Trop Med Hyg, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 734 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P. Almeida and C. Penha-Goncalves
Long Perfect Dinucleotide Repeats Are Typical of Vertebrates, Show Motif Preferences and Size Convergence
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1226 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. Amos, C. M. Hutter, M. D. Schug, and C. F. Aquadro
Directional Evolution of Size Coupled with Ascertainment Bias for Variation in Drosophila Microsatellites
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2003; 20(4): 660 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. T. Webster, N. G. C. Smith, and H. Ellegren
Microsatellite evolution inferred from human- chimpanzee genomic sequence alignments
PNAS, June 25, 2002; 99(13): 8748 - 8753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. P. Calabrese, R. T. Durrett, and C. F. Aquadro
Dynamics of Microsatellite Divergence Under Stepwise Mutation and Proportional Slippage/Point Mutation Models
Genetics, October 1, 2001; 159(2): 839 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. C. Fisher, G. Koenig, T. J. White, and J. W. Taylor
A Test for Concordance Between the Multilocus Genealogies of Genes and Microsatellites in the Pathogenic Fungus Coccidioides immitis
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2000; 17(8): 1164 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
I. Colson and D. B. Goldstein
Evidence for Complex Mutations at Microsatellite Loci in Drosophila
Genetics, June 1, 1999; 152(2): 617 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. D. Irvin, K. A. Wetterstrand, C. M. Hutter, and C. F. Aquadro
Genetic Variation and Differentiation at Microsatellite Loci in Drosophila simulans: Evidence for Founder Effects in New World Populations
Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 777 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.