Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (65)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 11, 9-21, Copyright © 1994 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Patterns of sequence variation in the mitochondrial D-loop region of shrews

DT Stewart and AJ Baker
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto.

Direct sequencing of the mitochondrial displacement loop (D-loop) of shrews (genus Sorex) for the region between the tRNA(Pro) and the conserved sequence block-F revealed variable numbers of 79-bp tandem repeats. These repeats were found in all 19 individuals sequenced, representing three subspecies and one closely related species of the masked shrew group (Sorex cinereus cinereus, S. c. miscix, S. c. acadicus, and S. haydeni) and an outgroup, the pygmy shrew (S. hoyi). Each specimen also possessed an adjacent 76-bp imperfect copy of the tandem repeats. One individual was heteroplasmic for length variants consisting of five and seven copies of the 79-bp tandem repeat. The sequence of the repeats is conducive to the formation of secondary structure. A termination-associated sequence is present in each of the repeats and in a unique sequence region 5' to the tandem array as well. Mean genetic distance between the masked shrew taxa and the pygmy shrew was calculated separately for the unique sequence region, one of the tandem repeats, the imperfect repeat, and these three regions combined. The unique sequence region evolved more rapidly than the tandem repeats or the imperfect repeat. The small genetic distance between pairs of tandem repeats within an individual is consistent with a model of concerted evolution. Repeats are apparently duplicated and lost at a high rate, which tends to homogenize the tandem array. The rate of D- loop sequence divergence between the masked and pygmy shrews is estimated to be 15%-20%/Myr, the highest rate observed in D-loops of mammals. Rapid sequence evolution in shrews may be due either to their high metabolic rate and short generation time or to the presence of variable numbers of tandem repeats.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J HeredHome page
J. R. Purdue, T. K. Oleksyk, and M. H. Smith
Independent Occurrences of Multiple Repeats in the Control Region of Mitochondrial DNA of White-Tailed Deer
J. Hered., May 1, 2006; 97(3): 235 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. W. Matson and R. J. Baker
DNA Sequence Variation in the Mitochondrial Control Region of Red-Backed Voles (Clethrionomys)
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2001; 18(8): 1494 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. Sturmbauer, S. Baric, W. Salzburger, L. Rüber, and E. Verheyen
Lake Level Fluctuations Synchronize Genetic Divergences of Cichlid Fishes in African Lakes
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2001; 18(2): 144 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. L. Nesbo, M. O. Arab, and K. S. Jakobsen
Heteroplasmy, Length and Sequence Variation in the mtDNA Control Regions of Three Percid Fish Species (Perca fluviatilis, Acerina cernua, Stizostedion lucioperca)
Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 1907 - 1919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.