Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on May 23, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(8):1705-1713; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn121
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/8/1705    most recent
msn121v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eirín-López, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ausió, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eirín-López, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ausió, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

The Sperm Proteins from Amphioxus Mirror Its Basal Position among Chordates and Redefine the Origin of Vertebrate Protamines

José María Eirín-López*,{dagger}, Lindsay J. Frehlick*, Manel Chiva{ddagger}, Núria Saperas§ and Juan Ausió*

* Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
{dagger} Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de A Zapateira s/n, A Coruña, Spain
{ddagger} Departament de Ciències Fisiològiques II, Facultat de Medicina, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
§ Departament d'Enginyeria Química, ETSEIB, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Diagonal, 647, Barcelona, Spain

E-mail: jausio{at}uvic.ca


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Conclusions
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The sperm nuclear basic proteins (SNBPs) that participate in chromatin condensation in spermatozoa belong to 3 groups: histone (H), protamine-like (PL), and protamine (P) type. They share a common origin with histone H1 resulting from the segregation of PL components, corresponding to different regions of an H1 precursor molecule (N-terminal, winged-helix, C-terminal domains), becoming independent and following a subsequent process of parallel vertical evolution (H {leftrightarrow} PL {leftrightarrow} P). In the present work, we describe the sequence and primary structure of the main SNBP component in the sperm of the cephalochordate Branchiostoma floridae (amphioxus), revealing that it represents the deuterostome counterpart of the PL-III SNBP component from molluscs corresponding to the H1 N-terminal region. Until now, this has been a missing piece needed to complete the evolutionary history of SNBPs in metazoan genomes. The discovery of this PL lineage in deuterostomes definitively validates the parallel vertical evolution of SNBPs across metazoans, giving further support to the "basal" position of amphioxus among chordates, with respect to tunicates. Sequence analyses suggest that later on in evolution, the appearance of positively selected arginine-rich protamines, derived from the H1 C-terminal region, led to the extinction of this PL lineage in the genomes of early protostomes and deuterostomes. Given that tunicates are now viewed as a sister group of vertebrates, the lysine to arginine transition responsible for the origin of vertebrate protamines must be set a step back from tunicates.

Key Words: reproductive proteins • protamines • metazoans • long-term evolution • chromatin


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Conclusions
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In somatic eukaryotic cells, the DNA is compacted within the nucleus by chromatin, a nucleoprotein complex that results from the association of DNA with basic chromosomal proteins known as histones (van Holde 1988Go). In contrast, sperm cells exhibit much more protein variability, allowing the extreme compaction of chromatin and the subsequent reduction in the volume of the sperm nucleus (Ausió et al. 2007Go). The sperm nuclear basic proteins (SNBPs) that participate in the condensation process have been shown to belong to 3 well-defined groups: histone (H), protamine-like (PL), and protamine (P) types (Ausió 1995Go, 1999Go). We have recently shown that PL proteins shared a common evolutionary origin with the histone H1 family early in metazoan evolution, resulting from the segregation of independent PL gene components corresponding to different regions of a precursor molecule (N-terminal, winged-helix, and C-terminal domains) (Eirín-López, Lewis, et al. 2006Go).

This observation represents an important starting point in assembling the pieces necessary to reconstruct the evolutionary histories of histone H1 and SNBPs. Piece one, we already evidenced that the long-term evolution of the histone H1 family has been subject to a birth-and-death process under strong purifying selection at the protein level, leading to the high levels of diversification and differentiation observed among the family members in higher eukaryotes (Eirín-López et al. 2004Go; Nei and Rooney 2006Go). Piece 2, the long-term evolution of SNBPs seems to be best described by a process of parallel vertical evolution (H {leftrightarrow} PL {leftrightarrow} P) subject to purifying selection at least in H-type and PL-type lysine-rich lineages in both protostomes and deuterostomes (Eirín-López, Lewis, et al. 2006Go). Accordingly, only H- or PL-precursor SNBP types would be present in those taxa that arose early in metazoan evolution, whereas the more specialized PL and P types would represent a characteristic feature of those taxa located at the uppermost evolutionary branches of bilaterian evolution. Piece 3, the transition from lysine-rich PLs toward the highly specialized arginine-rich protamines was caused by a frameshift mutation in the PL component corresponding to the C-terminal region of H1 (Lewis et al. 2004Go) and involved a shift from negative selection to an adaptive selection process (Eirín-López, Lewis, et al. 2006Go).

However, an important piece is still needed in order to articulate and validate the whole evolutionary picture of these proteins. In one hand, functional PL components corresponding to the N-terminal region of an H1 precursor have been only identified in mollusc species (protostomes) (Rocchini et al. 1995Go). This observation is in contrast to the expectations made by the model of parallel vertical evolution of SNBPs, which suggests that the differentiation of the 3 PL components occurred before the split between protostomes and deuterostomes. On the other hand, and more importantly, very recent analyses have traded the position of tunicates with that occupied by cephalochordates (also known as amphioxus or lancelets) in chordate evolution (Bourlat et al. 2006Go), with the amphioxus now being viewed as the most "basal" chordate and the tunicates as the sister group of the vertebrates (Bourlat et al. 2006Go; Holland 2007Go).

In the present work, we found that the SNBP component in the sperm of the cephalochordate Branchiostoma floridae is exclusively composed of the PL fraction corresponding to the N-terminal region of H1. The discovery of this PL lineage in deuterostomes definitively validates the parallel vertical evolution of SNBPs across metazoans, giving further support to the basal position of the amphioxus among chordates, with respect to tunicates. The appearance of arginine-rich protamines later on in evolution led to the extinction of this PL lineage due to its inability to undergo a lysine to arginine transition.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Conclusions
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
SNBP Extraction and Fractionation
SNBPs were extracted from testes of B. floridae with 0.4 N HCl and precipitated with acetone as described in Wang and Ausió (2001)Go. The protein extract thus obtained was fractionated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a reverse phase 300-Å Vydac C18 column (25 x 0.46 cm) eluted at 1 ml/min with a 0.1%Trifluoroacetic acid–acetonitrile gradient, and the absorbance was monitored at 230 nm (Ausió 1988Go). Proteins were analyzed by acetic acid–urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (AU-PAGE) (15% acrylamide, 0.1% bisacrylamide, 5% acetic acid, and 2.5 M urea), and gels were then stained with 0.2% (w/v) Coomassie blue for 1 h in 25% (v/v) isopropanol 10% (v/v) acetic acid and destained overnight in 10% (v/v) isopropanol/10% (v/v) acetic acid.

In Silico Isolation of the Amphioxus PL Protein and Genomic DNA and cDNA Sequence Determination
Protein sequences corresponding to the PL component of the sperm of molluscs, tunicates and sea urchins were used in protein–protein basic local alignment and search tool (BLAST) searches against the complete genome sequence of B. floridae (unmasked v1.0, DOE Joint Genome Institute, http://www.jgi.doe.gov). The genomic region of the only SNBP candidate found (sequence ID 125082) was subsequently retrieved from the amphioxus database and used in the design of gene-specific primers. Total RNA was extracted from whole B. floridae animals using Trizol reagent (GibcoBRL, Burlington, ON), and mRNA was isolated using an mRNA purification kit (Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ). Genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON) following the manufacturers’ instructions. Gene-specific primers were designed using the genomic sequence retrieved from the amphioxus genome as a reference, and they were subsequently used for polymerase chain reaction with cDNA and genomic DNA templates. In addition, rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) was employed to obtain the complete cDNA sequence using the First Choice RACE Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Sequencing was done by the DNA Sequencing Facility, Centre for Biomedical Research at the University of Victoria.

Molecular Evolutionary Analyses
A total of 206 amino acid sequences (see supplementary table, Supplementary Material online) were used in the analyses, including 91 nonredundant histone H1 somatic sequences (68 replication dependent [RD] and 23 replication independent [RI]), 1 oocyte-specific H1, 16 testis-specific H1, 97 SNBP sequences (3 H type, 18 PL type, and 76 P type), and the PL protein from amphioxus. Multiple alignments of the amino acid sequences were conducted using the BIOEDIT (Hall 1999Go) program, and all molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted using the program MEGA version 3.1 (Kumar et al. 2004Go). The extent of the amino acid divergence was estimated by means of the uncorrected differences (p distance), and the minimum evolution tree-building method (Saitou and Nei 1987Go) was used to reconstruct the phylogenetic trees. In order to assess that our results were not dependent on this method, the simplified phylogeny was compared with a maximum parsimony tree reconstructed using the close-neighbor-interchange tree search method. The reliability of the topologies was tested by the bootstrap method (Felsenstein 1985Go) and the interior branch test (confidence probability) method (Sitnikova 1996Go), based on 1,000 replicates. Codon usage analyses on PL, P, and H1 genes were performed by using the DnaSP version 3 program (Rozas et al. 2003Go), using the "effective number of codons" (ENC) to estimate the codon usage bias (Wright 1990Go).


    Results and Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Conclusions
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The Main Sperm Chromosomal Protein of Amphioxus Corresponds to the N-terminal Region of a Histone H1 Precursor
Figure 1A shows the SNBP composition of B. floridae (lane 5) in comparison to that of representative species from different classes of echinoderms and a tunicate. As seen in this figure (lanes 1–3), echinoderm SNBPs belong to the H type with the exception of the class Holoturoidea, where a short PL (protein Phi-0) (Subirana 1970Go) is present in addition to a full histone complement (Azorin et al. 1983Go) (see fig. 1A, lane 3). In contrast, most of the histones are replaced by highly specialized PL-type proteins in tunicates (Saperas et al. 1992Go; Chiva et al. 1995Go), which are highly reminiscent of the P type of SNBPs (Lewis et al. 2004Go) (fig. 1A, lane 4). The amphioxus stands out in this comparative analysis in that it consists of SNBPs running as a single electrophoretic band with a higher mobility than histones, representing the main sperm chromosomal component. Despite the uniform monodisperse electrophoretic appearance, subsequent HPLC fractionations (fig. 1B) revealed the presence of several distinct peaks, depicting the microheterogeneous nature of SNBPs which is a structural characteristic of many chromosomal sperm proteins (Lewis et al. 2003Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1.— (A) AU-PAGE of acid extracted testes proteins from the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (1), the starfish Pisaster ochraceus (2), the sea cucumber Thyone briareus (3), the sea squirt Styela montereyensis (4), and the amphioxus Branchiostoma floridae (5). (B) Fractionation and purification of B. floridae SNBPs by reverse phase HPLC. Proteins were eluted with an acetonitrile gradient. The inset gel is an AU-PAGE of the different peaks (1–9), SS stands for a protein marker.

 
Partial information on the N-terminal residues of the main SNBP component of B. floridae was obtained (Saperas et al. 1994Go) and used as a reference in the in silico identification of the amphioxus SNBP in the B. floridae genome assembly. Direct protein BLAST searches against the amphioxus genome database revealed the highest similarity score with the PL-III protein from molluscs (fig. 2A), a PL component corresponding to the N-terminal region of H1 (Ausió 1999Go; Eirín-López, Lewis, et al. 2006Go). Interestingly, the extent of sequence homology is much lower in comparisons done with tunicate SNBPs, a group phylogenetically closer to amphioxus than molluscs (supplementary figure, Supplementary Material online).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 2.— (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of the main Branchiostoma floridae SNBP compared with the PL-III component from the mollusc Mytilus californianus (mussel). Arginine (R) and lysine (K) residues are indicated in black and gray boxes, respectively, and homology regions are highlighted by black bars below the alignment. Matching residues and gaps are indicated by dots and dashes, respectively. (B) Schematic representation of the exon–intron organization of the B. floridae SNBP gene. (C) Sequence of the SNBP transcript unit (the coding region is highlighted by a gray box) isolated from B. floridae cDNA. The locations of the primers F1/R1 used to confirm the presence of this gene in vivo and the additional pair of primers F2/R2 used in RACE amplifications are indicated by open boxes in the sequence. Exon boundaries are indicated with open arrowheads. The polyadenylation signal and tail are underlined with solid and discontinuous black lines, respectively. Numbering on the left is referred to the nucleotide sequence and numbering on the right refers to amino acid residues.

 
The sequence of the gene encoding this putative SNBP was retrieved from the B. floridae genome database and had 3 exons in the coding region (fig. 2B). The full-length protamine cDNA was subsequently obtained, assessing the existence and functionality of this protein in vivo in amphioxus, consisting of a coding region which was 333 nt in length, and encoding a protein with an amino acid composition virtually identical to that previously obtained (Saperas et al. 1994Go) (fig. 2C). Although the B. floridae SNBP was found to be expressed through polyadenylated transcripts, a feature common to other SNBPs and RI histones, it is unique among SNBPs in having introns, a feature only observed in the PL-III protein from molluscs (Prats and Cornudella 1995Go). The presence of introns not only lends further support to the close evolutionary relationship between the amphioxus PL and mollusc PL-III SNBPs but also reinforces the notion of the common evolutionary origin of the SNBP lineage and the RI histone H1 lineage, whose gene members also have introns (Eirín-López, Lewis, et al. 2006Go).

Molecular Evolutionary Genomics of SNBPs
The hypothesis for the parallel vertical evolution of SNBPs (Ausió 1999Go) predicts that only H- or PL-precursor SNBP types would be found in those taxa that arose early in metazoan evolution. The phylogenetic relationships among H1 and SNBPs reconstructed in the present work (fig. 3) clearly support this notion, depicting an evolutionary diversification process that mirrors the evolution of triploblastic animals. In fact, histone H1 and protamines appear as 2 clearly differentiated groups, with PLs occupying an intermediate position. The occurrence of RD and RI H1 histones, as well as PL- and P-type SNBPs in protostome and deuterostome representatives, provides support that their evolutionary origin occurred prior to the split between these 2 groups of organisms.


Figure 3
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 3.— Phylogenetic relationships between SNBPs and histone H1 reconstructed from 206 protein sequences, showing the progressive diversification of the members of the H1, PL, and P groups. Whereas the long-term evolution of H1 members is subject to birth-and-death evolution under a strong purifying selection, SNBPs of the PL type are subject to a slightly less constrained selection process that is concomitant with the decrease in the lysine/arginine (K/R) ratio. The replacement of lysines by arginines in PL proteins eventually results in a shift toward an adaptive selection process (pN > pS) favoring a high arginine content in specialized protamines. Numbers for interior branches indicate bootstrap (black) and interior branch test (red) confidence values based on 1,000 replications (only shown if greater than 50%) for the groups defined by the topology.

 
The topology shown in figure 3 is in good agreement with the taxonomic relationships among species, indicating a monophyletic origin for the group of RI H1s and a functional clustering pattern for the different mammalian somatic H1 isoforms (Eirín-López, Lewis, et al. 2006Go). The major SNBP component of B. floridae locates in the PL region of the topology and shares a monophyletic origin with the PL-III SNBP component from molluscs, supporting the biochemical and molecular analyses presented in the previous section. Given that amphioxus represents the only deuterostome in which the main sperm chromosomal protein corresponds to the N-terminal region of a histone H1 precursor, this result definitively validates the hypothesis of their parallel vertical evolution (Ausió 1999Go). Accordingly, the products of the segregation of the different SNBP components from a histone H1 molecule should be present in both protostomes and deuterostomes, in agreement with their common evolutionary origin (Eirín-López, Lewis, et al. 2006Go). However, only components corresponding to the C-terminal region of H1 were found in deuterostomes, which eventually led to the differentiation of highly specialized arginine-rich protamines (Lewis et al. 2004Go). The reconstruction of a simplified tree (fig. 4) underscores the close relationship of B. floridae PL with SNBPs of the PL type in molluscs, especially PL-I and PL-III. Furthermore, the PL component from B. floridae appears to be somewhat more closely related to molluscan PL-I, PL-III, and Phi-0 SNBPs, suggesting a more primitive origin and a closer relationship to echinoderms, as supported by recent phylogenetic evidence (Jutglar et al. 1991Go).


Figure 4
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 4.— The tree was rooted with the H1-like sequence from the protist Entamoeba histolytica as it represents one of the most primitive eukaryotes for which a H1-related protein has been characterized (Kasinsky et al. 2001Go). The different lineages of H1 (RD/RI) as well as PL-type and P-type SNBPs are indicated in the right margin of the topology together with the mechanisms of 3' mRNA processing specific for each group. Transition proteins and testis-specific H1 histones (H1t) are marked as (*) to indicate that their expression pattern is intermediate between RD and RI H1 histones. Numbers for interior branches are representative of bootstrap and interior branch test, followed by the bootstrap values obtained in the reconstruction of the maximum parsimony tree (in boldface). Numbers in parentheses by the species names indicate the number of sequences used.

 
The differentiation of the amphioxus SNBP lineage reported in figure 3 agrees with the evidence provided by recent reports supporting the status of the amphioxus as the most basal chordate, in exchange of tunicates (Bourlat et al. 2006Go). In such scenario, the SNBP component from amphioxus (whose protostome counterpart is represented by the PL-III protein from molluscs) would represent the oldest deuterostome PL lineage, prior to the differentiation of PLs corresponding to the C-terminal region of H1.

The Amphioxus PL Lineage Is Subject to Different Evolutionary Constraints than the Protamines or the PL-I Lineage from Tunicates
The progressive specialization of SNBPs has followed a parallel vertical pattern of evolution defined as H {leftrightarrow} PL {leftrightarrow} P (Ausió 1999Go; Eirín-López, Frehlick, and Ausió 2006Go), encompassing a progressive replacement of lysines (K) by arginines (R) leading to a more efficient DNA packaging in the sperm as well as in the activation of enzymatic cascades after fertilization in vertebrates (Ausió et al. 1984Go; Ohtsuki et al. 1996Go; Rooney and Zhang 1999Go). The gradual variation in the K/R ratio across H1/SNBP evolution is evident in the phylogeny shown in figure 3, ranging from around 8.7 in the case of H1 to 0.1 in the case of protamines. Furthermore, the increase in arginine is concomitant with the increase in the numbers of nonsynonymous substitutions among P lineages (see fig. 3), suggesting that this trait is positively selected.

It has been recently shown that a frameshift mutation involving only 2 nt would be enough to duplicate the percent of arginine in the PL component of the tunicate Ciona intestinalis, due to the high frequency of AAG and AGA triplets encoding polylysine and polyarginine tracts, respectively (Lewis et al. 2004Go). By studying the relative codon usage for lysine and arginine residues (fig. 5A), it is evident that, although the SNBP from B. floridae presents similar amounts of lysine and arginine (as does PL-III from molluscs), all lysines are encoded by the same codon (AAA) with a higher proportion of arginine residues encoded by CGU and CGC. This codon preference is in sharp contrast to that shown by histone H1 and the PL components from molluscs, where arginines are mainly encoded by AGA and AGG triplets, and would ultimately represent an insurmountable barrier for a lysine to arginine transition based on a frameshift mutation.


Figure 5
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 5.— (A) Codon bias (ENC) and relative codon usage (%) of basic residues in protamine-like (PL-type) SNBPs from different protostome and deuterostome taxonomic groups corresponding to different regions of a histone H1 precursor. The lysine (K) and arginine (R) content is indicated in comparison with human histone H1. (B) Schematic evolution of SNBP segregation and specialization in the currently understood phylogenetic context for deuterostomes (Holland 2007). The lysine-rich SNBP component corresponding to the C-terminal region of H1 (indicated in grey) was the preferred choice of tunicates and vertebrates. This region was subject to a process of positive selection, resulting in a lysine to arginine transition, which gave rise to specialized protamines (represented in black). Such a fast adaptive process, together with the inability of the SNBP component corresponding to the H1 N-terminal region to undergo a lysine to arginine transition, led to the extinction of this later lineage (indicated in grey), which represented the choice of cephalochordates and possibly of some echinoderms. The small grey arrow represents the point at which the lysine to arginine transition was believed to occur (Lewis et al. 2004), in comparison with the point at which this transition must have occurred (big black arrow) in order to account for the presence of arginine-rich protamines in both vertebrates and tunicates, as indicated in the present work. Question marks in the class Thaliacea and in the class Appendicularia indicate that SNBP composition in the sperm of these organisms is yet unknown. The overall content of lysine (K) respect to arginine (R) in each SNBP lineage is indicated in the right hand margin (>, higher; <, lower; =, similar; {approx} approximate).

 
Although molluscan PLs and the amphioxus SNBP are very biased in terms of their codon usage, somatic histone H1s and tunicate PLs exhibit intermediate and very low codon bias, respectively. This may be explained by the fact that although PL proteins rely equally on lysines and arginines for DNA packaging, constraints acting on protamines are only dependent on the overall arginine content of the molecule, rather than on the specific position of the arginines or the nature of their encoding triplets (Rooney et al. 2000Go; Lewis et al. 2003Go). This unusual form of purifying selection, together with the lysine to arginine transition, would be consistent with the low codon bias values observed in the arginine-rich PLs from tunicates in comparison with lysine-rich PLs.

The PL component from Amphioxus Provides a Footprint in the Process of Parallel Evolution Observed in SNBPs across Metazoan Genomes
There is now plenty of evidence indicating that the exclusion of specialized H1 genes from the main repetitive histone units to a solitary location in the genome resulted in the generation of an "orphon" group of H1 genes early in the evolution of metazoans (Eirín-López et al. 2002Go, 2004Go). The independent evolution of this group eventually led to the differentiation of RD and RI H1 variants, followed by the subsequent differentiation of SNBPs within the second lineage (Eirín-López, Lewis, et al. 2006Go). During the differentiation and diversification of these chromosomal proteins, the transition toward arginine-rich protamines appears to have involved in the progressive specialization of a PL protein corresponding to the C-terminal region of H1 (Lewis et al. 2004Go), which eventually suffered a shift from a purifying selection process (present in PLs) to adaptive selection favoring high arginine contents in protamines (fig. 5B) (Balhorn 2007Go). However, the presence and fate of the SNBP component corresponding to the N-terminal part of H1 have remained elusive until now.


    Conclusions
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Conclusions
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The identification of a deuterostome counterpart (represented by the amphioxus PL reported here) to the protostome PL component corresponding to the N-terminal region of a precursor histone H1 (represented by the PL-III protein from molluscs) provides a footprint that definitively validates the parallel vertical evolution of SNBPs (summarized in fig. 6). This result is even more critically relevant in light of recent studies placing the amphioxus in the basal position in chordate evolution (Bourlat et al. 2006Go), in place of tunicates. In this new scenario, the lysine to arginine transition observed in tunicates could no longer be considered as an early event in bilaterians or stand for the origin of protamines in vertebrates. The existence of tunicate PLs which are already highly specialized and reminiscent of P-type SNBPs, together with the sharp contrast they present with respect to the primitive amphioxus PL-type SNBP lineage, make tempting to hypothesize that such observations support the basal condition of amphioxus among chordates (fig. 5B). Furthermore, the Phi-0 protein from the sea cucumber Holothuria tubulosa (Prats and Cornudella 1995Go) displays certain sequence similarities, including the presence of introns, with the B. floridae SNBP as well as with PL-III (figs. 3 and 4). This further supports the origin of this SNBP lineage as early as before the differentiation between protostomes and deuterostomes. However, and even by taking into account that protamines have been successfully used as molecular markers in the past (Eirín-López, Frehlick, and Ausió 2006Go; Frehlick et al. 2006Go), these results must be interpreted with caution given that tunicates have very derived genomes and body plans.


Figure 6
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 6.— Schematic representation of the evolutionary process followed by SNBPs across bilaterians since their origin from a precursor histone H1 molecule (Eirín-López et al. 2006), indicating the major events leading to the differentiation of actual protamine-like and protamine lineages. The evolutionary relationships among the major groups of animals have been represented following recent reports based on a phylogenomic sampling (Dunn et al. 2008; Telford 2008). The different stages in the parallel vertical evolution of SNBPs (H {leftrightarrow} PL {leftrightarrow} P) are highlighted with light grey background (H stage), grey background (PL stage) and dark grey background (P stage). The differentiation of the three H1 domains was followed by a first segregation event (indicated by a white arrow) leading to the independization of the N-terminal region of H1 (indicated in white). Shortly after, a second segregation event (indicated by a black arrow) resulted in the segregation of the lysine-rich C-terminal domain (indicated in grey), whose preferred codon usage for lysine residues (mostly AGA) allowed a lysine (K) to arginine (R) transition (being AAG the preferred codon for this later amino acid) based on a frameshift mutation, involving a shift from negative selection to a rapid adaptive selection process (the resulting arginine-rich SNBP component is represented in black). Such specialized protamines acquired priority as the preferential choice for DNA packaging in the sperm nucleus, leading to the extinction of arginine-poor SNBPs, including the lineage corresponding to the N-terminal region of H1. Nevertheless, this later SNBP component was able to subsist in concrete groups of both protostomes (mollusc PL-III) and deuterostomes (amphioxus and sea urchin SNBPs) as a ‘fossil’ lineage (whose evolutionary pathway is indicated by white lines across the diagram). The different SNBP lineages and types of spermatozoa found in actual bilaterians are represented in the top of the figure. Given that SNBPs provide different efficiencies in DNA packaging in the sperm, they can probably influence the shape of the sperm nucleus, bearing critical implications for fertility and sperm competition (Ausió, Eirín-López, and Frehlick 2007). The different hypothesized relationships among chordates are represented in the right hand margin of the figure as follows: while in one hypothesis (DEUTEROSTOMES I) the cephalochordates are viewed as the most ‘basal’ chordates, in the other one (DEUTEROSOMES II) tunicates are considered as the earliest offshot of the chordate lineage, and amphioxus as the closest group to vertebrates. In this later case, the appearance of already highly differentiated arginine-rich protamines as early as in tunicates seems incompatible with the prevalence of the PL lineage later on during the differentiation between cephalochordates and vertebrates. Oppositely, a ‘basal’ position of cephalochordates would agree with the early differentiation between the SNBP lineage from amphioxus (N-terminal region of H1) and the highly differentiated arginine-rich protamines typical from tunicates and vertebrates (C-terminal region of H1).

 
The SNBP component corresponding to the H1 N-terminal region appears to be the initial choice for sperm DNA packaging in early metazoans. The extinction of this PL lineage in the genome was probably due to its inability to undergo a lysine to arginine transition based on the observed patterns of codon usage bias for lysine residues. In this regard, the PL-III protein from molluscs and the SNBP component identified in amphioxus would represent end points of the SNBP evolutionary process in deuterostome and protostome genomes that were promptly discarded by the fast specialization experienced by arginine-rich PL- and P-type SNBPs which arose through a process of positive selection.


    Supplementary Material
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Conclusions
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Supplementary table and figure are available at Molecular Biology and Evolution online (http://www.mbe.oxfordjournals.org/). The sequence described in the present work has been deposited in the GenBank database with accession number EU271675.


    Acknowledgements
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Conclusions
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We are very thankful to Linda Holland of the Marine Biology Research Division at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (UCSD) for providing us with specimens of B. floridae during the early biochemical characterization of SNBPs and to Nancy Sherwood and her laboratory at the Department of Biology at UVic for providing us with material for the molecular biology analyses. This work was supported by Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Grant OGP 0046399-02 to J.A. and by Grants BFU 2005-00123 and BFU2006-04035/BMC from the Spanish MCYT PGC-FEDER. J.M.E.-L. is a recipient of a Postdoctoral Marie Curie International Fellowship within the sixth European Community Framework Program. L.J.F. holds an NSERC PGSD fellowship.


    Footnotes
 
Billie Swalla, Associate Editor


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Conclusions
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

    Ausió J. Histone H1 and the evolution of the nuclear sperm-specific proteins. In: Advances in spermatozoal phylogeny and taxonomy—Jamieson BGM, Ausió J, Justine JL, eds. (1995) Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Paris (France). p. 447–462.

    Ausió J. An unusual cysteine-containing histone H1-like protein and two protamine-like proteins are the major nuclear proteins of the sperm of the bivalve mollusc Macoma nasuta. J Biol Chem (1988) 263:10141–10150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Ausió J. Histone H1 and evolution of sperm nuclear basic proteins. J Biol Chem (1999) 274:31115–31118.[Free Full Text]

    Ausió J, Eirín-López JM, Frehlick LJ. Evolution of vertebrate chromosomal sperm proteins: implications for fertility and sperm competition. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl (2007) 65:63–79.[Medline]

    Ausió J, Greulich KO, Watchel E. Characterization of the fluorescence of the protamine thynnine and studies of binding to double-stranded DNA. Biopolymers (1984) 23:2559–2571.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Azorin F, Olivares C, Jordan A, Perez-Grau L, Cornudella L, Subirana JA. Heterogeneity of the histone-containing chromatin in sea cucumber spermatozoa. Distribution of the basic protein phi 0 and absence of non-histone proteins. Exp Cell Res (1983) 148:331–344.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Balhorn R. The protamine family of sperm nuclear proteins. Genome Biol (2007) 8:227.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Bourlat SJ, Juliusdottir T, Lowe CJ, et al, (14 co-authors). Deuterostome phylogeny reveals monophyletic chordates and the new phylum Xenoturbellida. Nature (2006) 444:85–88.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Chiva M, Saperas N, Cáceres C, Ausió J. Nuclear basic proteins from the sperm of tunicates, cephalochordates, agnathans and fish. In: Advances in spermatazoal phylogeny and taxonomy—Jamieson BGM, Ausió J, Justine JL, eds. (1995) Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Paris (France). p. 501–514.

    Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, et al, (18 co-authors). Broad phylogenomics sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature (2008) 452:745–749.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Eirín-López JM, Frehlick LJ, Ausió J. Protamines, in the footsteps of linker histone evolution. J Biol Chem (2006) 281:1–4.[Free Full Text]

    Eirín-López JM, González-Tizón AM, Martínez A, Méndez J. Molecular and evolutionary analysis of mussel histone genes (Mytilus spp.): possible evidence of an "orphon origin" for H1 histone genes. J Mol Evol (2002) 55:272–283.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Eirín-López JM, González-Tizón AM, Martínez A, Méndez J. Birth-and-death evolution with strong purifying selection in the histone H1 multigene family and the origin of orphon H1 genes. Mol Biol Evol (2004) 21:1992–2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Eirín-López JM, Lewis JD, Howe L, Ausió J. Common phylogenetic origin of protamine-like (PL) proteins and histone H1: evidence from bivalve PL genes. Mol Biol Evol (2006) 23:1304–1317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution Int J Org Evolution (1985) 39:783–791.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Frehlick LJ, Eirín-López JM, Prado A, Su HW, Kasinsky HE, Ausió J. Sperm nuclear basic proteins of two closely related species of Scorpaeniform fish (Sebastes maliger, Sebastolobus sp.) with different sexual reproduction and the evolution of fish protamines. J Exp Zoolog A Comp Exp Biol (2006) 305:277–287.[Medline]

    Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (1999) 41:95–98.

    Holland LZ. A chordate with a difference. Nature (2007) 447:153–155.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Jutglar L, Borrell JI, Ausió J. Primary, secondary, and tertiary structure of the core of a histone H1-like protein from the sperm of Mytilus. J Biol Chem (1991) 266:8184–8191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kasinsky HE, Lewis JD, Dacks JB, Ausió J. Origin of H1 histones. FASEB J (2001) 15:34–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform (2004) 5:150–163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Lewis JD, Saperas N, Song Y, Zamora MJ, Chiva M, Ausió J. Histone H1 and the origin of protamines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2004) 101:4148–4152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Lewis JD, Song Y, de Jong M, Bagha S, Ausió J. A walk though vertebrate and invertebrate protamines. Chromosoma (2003) 111:473–482.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Nei M, Rooney AP. Concerted and birth-and-death evolution in multigene families. Annu Rev Genet (2006) 39:121–152.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Ohtsuki K, Nishikawa Y, Saito H, Munakata H, Kato T. DNA-binding sperm proteins with oligo-arginine clusters function as potent activators for egg CK-II. FEBS Lett (1996) 378:115–120.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Prats E, Cornudella L. The gene encoding the sperm-specific basic nuclear protein fo from sea cucumber. In: Advances in spermatozoal phylogeny and taxonomy. Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle—Jamieson BGM, Ausió J, Justine JL, eds. (1995) Paris (France): NHBS Evironment Bookstore. 491–500.

    Rocchini C, Rice P, Ausió J. Complete sequence and characterization of the major sperm nuclear basic protein from Mytilus trossulus. FEBS Lett (1995) 363:37–40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Rooney AP, Zhang J. Rapid evolution of a primate sperm protein: relaxation of functional constraint or positive Darwinian selection? Mol Biol Evol (1999) 16:706–710.[Abstract]

    Rooney AP, Zhang J, Nei M. An unusual form of purifying selection in a sperm protein. Mol Biol Evol (2000) 17:278–283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Rozas J, Sánchez-del Barrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas P. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics (2003) 19:2496–2497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol (1987) 4:406–425.[Abstract]

    Saperas N, Chiva M, Ausió J. Purification and characterization of the protamines and related proteins from the sperm of a tunicate, Styela plicata. Comp Biochem Physiol (1992) 103:969–974.[CrossRef]

    Saperas N, Chiva M, Ribes E, Kasinsky HE, Rosenberg E, Youson JH, Ausió J. Chromosomal proteins of the sperm of a cephalochordate (Branchiostoma floridae) and an agnathan (Petromyzon marinus). Compositional variability of the nuclear sperm proteins of deuterostomes. Biol Bull (1994) 186:101–114.[Abstract]

    Sitnikova T. Bootstrap method of interior-branch test for phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol (1996) 13:605–611.[Abstract]

    Subirana JA. Nuclear proteins from a somatic and a germinal tissue of the echinoderm Holothuria tubulosa. Exp Cell Res (1970) 63:253–260.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Telford MJ. Resolving animal phylogeny: a sledgehammer for a tough nut? Dev Cell (2008) 14:457–459.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    van Holde KE. Chromatin (1988) New York: Springer.

    Wang X, Ausió J. Histones are the major chromosomal protein components of the sperm of the nemerteans Cerebratulus californiensis and Cerebratulus lacteus. J Exp Zool (2001) 290:431–436.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Wright F. The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene. Gene (1990) 87:23–29.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Accepted for publication May 20, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/8/1705    most recent
msn121v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eirín-López, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ausió, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eirín-López, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ausió, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?