Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(11):2251-2254; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn188
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/11/2251    most recent
msn188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Weiß, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simon, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Weiß, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Letters

Intragenomic Variation of Fungal Ribosomal Genes Is Higher than Previously Thought

Uwe K. Simon* and Michael Weiß{dagger}

* Lehrstuhl für Pharmazeutische Biologie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
{dagger} Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik und Mykologie, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

E-mail: uwe.simon{at}biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de.


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Nuclear ribosomal genes in most eukaryotes are present in multiple copies and often used for taxonomic and phylogenetic analyses. We comprehensively examined intragenomic polymorphism levels of three nuclear ribosomal loci for four important plant pathogenic fungi by polymerase chain reaction amplification and cloning. Here, we show that single nucleotide polymorphisms are present in an unexpectedly high amount. This might have implications for studies of fungal evolution, phylogenetics, and population genetics. Furthermore, our work demonstrates that the majority of all ribosomal sequences obtained from one individual and gene is identical to the majority rule consensus sequence of all detected sequence variants. Due to the large number of polymorphisms found and the fact that the polymorphism level differed markedly even between ribosomal genes of one and the same individual, we assume that nuclear ribosomal genes might not always evolve in a strictly concerted manner.

Key Words: ascomycetes • cloning • evolution • majority rule consensus sequence • intragenomic polymorphism • Taq polymerase test

Ribosomal (rDNA) genes are among the earliest and most frequently used genes for phylogenetic studies (e.g., Woese et al. 1990Go, Berbee and Taylor 1999Go, Soltis et al. 1999Go, Karol et al. 2001Go, Medina et al. 2001Go, James et al. 2006Go). rDNA is relatively conserved allowing the reconstruction of relationships of even distantly related taxa. Yet, there are rDNA regions variable enough to discriminate between species. rDNA sequences may also exhibit variation within species, which can manifest itself by different length due to insertion or deletion (indels of single or several bases) or by differing nucleotides with no change in overall base pair number.

A number of studies hint toward intraindividual variation in the noncoding internal transcribed spacers (ITS; Gandolfi et al. 2001Go, Wörheide et al. 2004Go), which can be as high as 26 % in parthenogenic nematodes (Hugall et al. 1999Go). But to our knowledge, only one study has focused in depth on polymorphisms present in rDNA of individual fungi (Ganley and Kobayashi 2007Go).

The work presented here had been stimulated by repeatedly observing wobbles (superimposed base calls) in fungal rDNA after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing. We chose three nuclear rDNA genes coding for the small ribosomal subunit (SSU), the 5.8 S subunit plus ITS 1 and 2, and the D1–D3 region of the large subunit (LSU). We wanted to address the following questions: 1) what is the level of intragenomic polymorphism (IGP)?, 2) are IGPs equally distributed along the three loci?, and 3) does the IGP level differ between species and between genes? Additionally, we conceived a Taq test to estimate the potential contribution of Taq misreadings. We chose four important plant pathogenic ascomycetes: Mycosphaerella punctiformis, Davidiella tassiana, Teratosphaeria microspora, and Phoma exigua var. exigua. Origin of strains and GenBank accession numbers are provided in table 1. Methods are explained in the Supplementary Material online.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Origin of Fungal Material and NCBI GenBank Accession Numbers of Majority Rule Consensus Sequences Obtained in an Earlier Study (Simon UK, Groenewald J, Crous P, unpublished)

 
Our results show that most sequences from one gene and species are identical with the majority rule consensus of all sequences obtained from this gene and species. All detected IGPs were single nucleotide polymorphisms. Almost all clones featuring one or several IGPs were unique. A few IGPs occurred in up to three clones (supplementary table 1, Supplementary Material online), and 72 out of 254 polymorphic clones (28.3%) had more than 1 IGP. For example, in D. tassiana SSU, there were 20 clones with 1, 1 with 2, 4 with 3, 1 with 4, and 1 with 6 IGPs (supplementary table 1, Supplementary Material online). When pooled for all species, IGPs were more or less equally distributed along one gene (fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1.— Distribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms (represented by vertical lines) along SSU, ITS (comprising the 5.8S gene and both ITS), and the D1–D3 region of the LSU.

 
The polymorphism level p (number of IGPs per fragment length in percent) varied between 1.7% (T. microspora, LSU) and 3.7% (D. tassiana, SSU; table 2). For the same gene, p varied considerably between species. For example, p for the D1–D3 region (roughly, the first 900 bp) of the LSU ranged from 1.7% in T. microspora to 3.6% in D. tassiana (table 2). Variation between genes within one individual was lowest in T. microspora (p = 1.7% for LSU and 2.2% for ITS) and highest in M. punctiformis (p = 2.6% for SSU and 3.6% for ITS; table 2). This is mirrored in nucleotide diversity ({pi}) values (Nei and Li 1979Go; table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Percentage of Polymorphisms (p = numbers of polymorphic sites in relation to fragment length) in the Nuclear Ribosomal DNA (complete SSU, complete ITS1-5.8S-ITS2, D1–D3 region of LSU) of Davidiella tassiana, Mycosphaerella punctiformis, Phoma exigua var. exigua, and Teratosphaeria microspora

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Nucleotide Diversity {pi} (Nei and Li 1979Go) Calculated with DnaSP (Rozas et al. 2003Go) for Each Species and Genetic Region

 
In M. punctiformis and T. microspora ITS 1 and 2 had more IGPs than the 5.8 S gene, and the ITS region in total was more polymorphic than either SSU or LSU. Yet, this was not the case for the other two species (supplementary table 1, Supplementary Material online). However, the whole ITS region generally had a much higher proportion of transversions and indels than both SSU and LSU (fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 2.— Proportion (percentage of all detected polymorphisms) of indels, transversions, and transitions for each gene and species. Transitions are further split into substitutions between A and G and between C and T. P, Phoma exigua var. exigua; M, Mycosphaerella punctiformis, T, Teratosphaeria microspora; D, Davidiella tassiana.

 
Of all 338 detected IGPs, 307 (90.8%) were caused by transitions, 25 (7.4%) by transversions of the consensus nucleotides, and 6 (1.8%) by indels. Transitions from A to G (116 = 37.8% of all transitions) and from T to C (84 = 27.4%) were much more common than transitions from G to A (58 = 18.9%) or from C to T (49 = 16%). However, these relations differed markedly between genes and species (fig. 2). Potential Taq polymerase misreadings were not observed in 55 "secondary clones" from D. tassiana and 40 secondary clones from T. microspora. Yet, Taq polymerase may work differently on genomic and plasmid DNA. Therefore, the possibility of clonal sequence variation due to Taq misreadings cannot be excluded.

Our observations contrast with results obtained by whole-genome shotgun sequencing, which yielded very low polymorphism levels (Ganley and Kobayashi 2007Go). Accordingly, the authors concluded that rDNA repeats evolve in a strictly concerted way. Among the five fungi studied there, Aspergillus nidulans is most closely related to the species analyzed in our work. We have therefore examined 46 clones of the D1–D3 region of the LSU in A. nidulans using the same strain (FGSC-A4). We found 16 IGPs for a 917-bp fragment corresponding to p = 1.7%. One IGP was present in two clones. Only transitions were found: 11 between A and G and 5 between C and T. This is interesting because Ganley and Kobayashi (2007)Go reported 10 IGPs for the complete LSU and calculated a nucleotide diversity of {pi} = 0.00007 for rDNA of A. nidulans—10-fold below the {pi} value we obtained for the D1–D3 region of the LSU ({pi} = 0.00079). Furthermore, 8 of the 11 high-confidence polymorphisms they observed in all rDNA repeats were indels, whereas only 3 were transitions. Possibly, a moderate coverage (the number of reads per nucleotide) might not be sensitive enough for a reliable detection of IGPs occurring in only one or few arrays. Wendl and Yang (2004)Go have estimated that a coverage of at least 13 is needed to reliably assemble eukaryote genomes, whereas the highest level reached by Ganley and Kobayashi (2007)Go was 7.7. Indeed, IGP levels may be considerably higher than observed in our clone samples as suggested by extrapolations using EstimateS (Colwell [2005]; see supplementary table 2, Supplementary Material online).

The relatively high IGP levels and {pi} values observed in all four species and rDNA regions as well as the intraindividual differences in p between different genes suggest that nuclear ribosomal arrays might not always evolve in a strictly concerted manner. This has already been assumed for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spores (Pawlowska and Taylor 2004Go). According to Ganley and Kobayashi (2007)Go, rDNA repeats normally experience "rapid homogenization." This means that mutations are either deleted or multiplied during continual unequal recombination until one variant finally becomes dominant. In consequence, most of the unique polymorphisms found here should have arisen relatively recently (before homogenization). On the other hand, almost one-third of the polymorphic variants showed more than one IGP, indicating that repeats may also accumulate point mutations and, therefore, avoid homogenization to a certain degree.

High IGP levels in rDNA have been found in pro- and eukaryotes (Cilia et al. 1996Go, Campbell et al. 1997Go). In fungi, rare or absent sexual events and a "history of lab cultivation" may diminish gene variation (Ganley and Kobayashi 2007Go). The number of rDNA loci within the genome might influence polymorphism levels as could the absolute number of rDNA repeats. In ascomycetes, copy number differs widely. Aspergillus nidulans displays about 45 copies (Ganley and Kobayashi 2007Go), whereas Neurospora crassa has some 200 (Maleszka and Clark-Walker 1990Go). Genes coding for rRNA may form one cluster as in Saccharomyces cerevisiae or two as in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Pasero and Marilley 1993Go). Furthermore, Maleszka and Clark-Walker (1990)Go demonstrated that slow growing variants of the ascomycetous yeast Kluyveromyces lactis had fewer rDNA copies than fast growing ones. They observed that a long vegetative growth phase of a slowly proliferating mycelium triggered the development of faster growing variants with higher copy numbers. The IGP level of rDNA in fungi could also be influenced by the karyotic state: diploid versus haploid (e.g., in yeasts), monokaryotic (vegetative mycelium of Ascomycota) versus dikaryotic (Basidiomycota), or multinucleate (as in Glomeromycota).

Extrachromosomal rDNA (EX rDNA) might contribute to gene variation. In several fungi, linear or circular plasmids have been found, usually located within mitochondria and mostly coding for polymerases (Jabaji-Hare et al. 1994Go, Katsuja et al. 1997Go). However, in ascomycetous yeasts, EX rDNA was found. It has been calculated that Saccharomyces carlsbergensis has no more than 0.5–2 such plasmids per cell (Meyerink et al. 1979Go). However, in S. cerevisiae, their number seems to be much higher and apparently increases exponentially with cell age, so that plasmid rDNA content could equal total yeast DNA in old cells (Sinclair and Guarente 1997Go). This has not been shown for filamentous fungi, but it cannot be ruled out that EX rDNA partly contributes to the observed IGPs.

One of our objectives was to test whether superimposed base calls in sequences obtained directly from PCR products had been due to polymorphisms. This did not seem to be the case. Either the relevant IGPs have not been detected or these base calls originate from errors during cycle sequencing.

In summary, our results show that the number of IGPs in fungal nuclear ribosomal genes is unexpectedly high in the species tested, which indicates that concerted evolution does not always work as strictly as hitherto assumed for these loci.


    Supplementary Material
 TOP
 Abstract
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Supplementary tables 1 and 2, figure 1, and the methods section are available at Molecular Biology and Evolution online (http://www.mbe.oxfordjournals.org/).


    Acknowledgements
 TOP
 Abstract
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We are grateful to Diana Kuhn for assisting with PCR. U.K.S. has been funded by the German Research Foundation Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions and critical advice. U.K.S. planned and performed the experiments and M.W. conceived the test for the Taq polymerase. Both authors wrote the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
Geoffery McFadden, Associate Editor


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

    Berbee ML, Taylor JW. Fungal phylogeny. In: Molecular fungal biology—Oliver RP, Schweizer M, eds. (1999) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 21–77.

    Campbell CS, Wojciechowski MF, Baldwin BG, Alice LA, Donoghue MJ. Persistent nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence polymorphism in the Amelanchier agamic complex (Rosaceae). Mol Biol Evol (1997) 14(1):81–90.[Abstract]

    Cilia V, Lafay B, Christen R. Sequence heterogeneities among 16S ribosomal RNA sequences, and their effect on phylogenetic analyses at the species level. Mol Biol Evol (1996) 13(3):451–461.[Abstract]

    Colwell RK. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. (2005) Version 7.5. Available at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.

    Gandolfi A, Bonilauri P, Rossi V, Menozzi P. Intraindividual and intraspecies variability of ITS1 sequences in the ancient asexual Darwinula stevensoni (Crustaceae: Ostracoda). Heredity (2001) 87:449–455.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Ganley ARD, Kobayashi T. Highly efficient concerted evolution in the ribosomal DNA repeats: total rDNA repeat variation revealed by whole-genome shotgun sequence data. Gen Res (2007) 17:184–191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hugall A, Stanton J, Moritz C. Reticulate evolution and the origins of ribosomal internal transcribed spacer diversity in apomictic Meloidogyne. Mol Biol Evol (1999) 16(2):157–164.[Abstract]

    Jabaji-Hare SH, Burger G, Forget L, Lang BF. Extrachromosomal plasmids in the plant pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Curr Genet (1994) 25:423–431.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, et al, (70 co-authors). Reconstructing the early evolution of fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature (2006) 443:818–822.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Karol KG, McCourt RM, Cimino MT, Delwiche CF. The closest living relatives of land plants. Science (2001) 294:2351–2353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Katsuja S, Kaneko I, Owaki M, Ishikawa K, Tsujimoto T, Tsuge T. Circular DNA plasmid in the phytopathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata: its temperature-dependent curing during and association with pathogenicity. Genetics (1997) 146:111–120.[Medline]

    Maleszka R, Clark-Walker GD. Magnification of the rDNA cluster in Kluyveromyces lactis. Mol Gen Genet (1990) 223:342–344.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Medina M, Collins AG, Silberman JD, Sogin ML. Evaluating hypotheses of basal animal phylogeny using complete sequences of large and small subunit rRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2001) 98:9707–9712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Meyerink JH, Klootwijk J, Planta RJ. Extrachromosomal circular ribosomal DNA in the yeast Saccharomyces carlsbergensis. Nucleic Acids Res (1979) 7(1):69–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Nei M, Li W-H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1979) 94:7799–7806.[CrossRef]

    Pasero P, Marilley M. Size variation of rDNA clusters in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Gen Genet (1993) 236:448–452.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Pawlowska TE, Taylor JW. Organization of genetic variation in individuals of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature (2004) 427:733–737.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics (2003) 19:2496–2497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Sinclair DA, Guarente L. Extrachromosomal rDNA circles—a cause of aging in yeast. Cell (1997) 91:1033–1042.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Wolf PG, Nickrent DL, Chaw S, Chapman RL. The phylogeny of land plants inferred from 18S rDNA sequences: pushing the limits of rDNA signal? Mol Biol Evol (1999) 16:1774–1784.[Abstract]

    Wendl MC, Yang S-P. Gap statistics for whole genome shotgun DNA sequencing projects. Bioinformatics (2004) 20(10):1527–1534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposals for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1990) 87(12):4576–4579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Wörheide G, Nichols SA, Goldberg J. Intragenomic variation of the rDNA internal transcribed spacers in sponges (Phylum Porifera): implications for phylogenetic studies. Mol Phylogenet Evol (2004) 33:816–830.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Accepted for publication August 21, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/11/2251    most recent
msn188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Weiß, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simon, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Weiß, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?