Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 4, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(10):2233-2239; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn171
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/10/2233    most recent
msn171v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayakawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayakawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Big Bang in the Evolution of Extant Malaria Parasites

Toshiyuki Hayakawa*, Richard Culleton*,1, Hiroto Otani*, Toshihiro Horii{dagger} and Kazuyuki Tanabe*

* Laboratory of Malariology, International Research Center of Infectious Diseases, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
{dagger} Department of Molecular Protozoology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan

E-mail: hayakawa{at}biken.osaka-u.ac.jp.


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Materials
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Malaria parasites (genus Plasmodium) infect all classes of terrestrial vertebrates and display host specificity in their infections. It is therefore assumed that malaria parasites coevolved intimately with their hosts. Here, we propose a novel scenario of malaria parasite–host coevolution. A phylogenetic tree constructed using the malaria parasite mitochondrial genome reveals that the extant primate, rodent, bird, and reptile parasite lineages rapidly diverged from a common ancestor during an evolutionary short time period. This rapid diversification occurred long after the establishment of the primate, rodent, bird, and reptile host lineages, which implies that host-switch events contributed to the rapid diversification of extant malaria parasite lineages. Interestingly, the rapid diversification coincides with the radiation of the mammalian genera, suggesting that adaptive radiation to new mammalian hosts triggered the rapid diversification of extant malaria parasite lineages.

Key Words: malaria parasite • host switch • coevolution


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Materials
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Coevolution between parasites and their hosts is a widely recognized phenomenon in many parasite–host systems and constitutes an essential component of evolution and the diversity of life. Malaria parasites, the genus Plasmodium, cause malaria, one of the major infectious diseases prevalent in most tropical and subtropical areas of the world, and are found from all classes of terrestrial vertebrates (mammals, birds, and reptiles) (Levine 1988Go). Each malaria parasite species generally exhibits a restricted host range, for example, primate parasites infect only primates and cannot infect other mammals, birds, or reptiles (Levine 1988Go; Coatney et al. 2003Go). It is therefore assumed that malaria parasites have coevolved along with their hosts over long time periods. Previous studies have examined the evolutionary history of malaria parasites in order to investigate parasite–host coevolution (Waters et al. 1991Go; Escalante and Ayala 1994Go; Escalante et al. 1995Go, 1998Go; Martinsen et al. 2008Go). However, the assumption of parasite–host coevolution has not been fully addressed because of the difficulty in assigning a timescale to parasite evolution due to the lack of a fossil record of parasites. Here, we employ a unique parasite–host phylogenetic comparison to obtain a reliable timescale for evolution without a fossil record of parasites by detecting parasite–host codivergence points for calibration. Thus, we are able to construct a reliable evolutionary history of extant malaria parasites and propose a novel scenario of malaria parasite–host coevolution.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Materials
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
DNA Samples
Monkey blood infected with Plasmodium fieldi (N-3 strain), Plasmodium inui (IM-Perak), Plasmodium hylobati (WAK), Plasmodium cynomolgi (langur), Plasmodium simiovale, and Plasmodium gonderi, respectively, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Reptile blood infected with Plasmodium mexicanum was generous gift from Joseph J. Schall (University of Vermont, VT). Genomic DNA of these primate Plasmodium species and P. mexicanum (a reptile malaria parasite) was extracted by using QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genomic DNAs of Plasmodium malariae (Uganda I) and Plasmodium ovale (Nigeria II) were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (United States). Plasmodium coatneyi genomic DNA was kindly provided by Satoru Kawai (Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan).

Mitochondrial Genome Sequences
The whole mitochondrial genome was amplified by genomic polymerase chain reaction (PCR). To obtain whole mitochondrial genome sequences from P. hylobati, P. fieldi, P. inui, P. coatneyi, P. cynomolgi, and P. simiovale, six PCR primers (PvmtF5488, PvmtR3088, PvmtF2959, PvmtR0, PvmtF4978, and PvmtR1169) were designed based on the mitochondrial genome sequence of Plasmodium vivax (GenBank accession number NC_007243). PCR reactions were performed with 4 pmol of each primer and 1 µl of extracted genomic DNA solution in a total volume of 20 µl containing 400 µM dNTPs and 1 unit of LA-Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) in PCR buffer containing 2.5 mM MgCl2. GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used to generate the following conditions: denaturation at 93 °C for 1 min followed by 40 cycles of 93 °C for 20 s, 62 °C for 5 min, and extension at 72 °C for 10 min.

Genomic PCR of P. malariae and P. ovale was performed using two primers (MOcytbF1 and MOcytbR1) that were designed on the basis of partial sequences of their respective cytochrome b genes (GenBank accession numbers AF069624 [GenBank] and AB182496 [GenBank] ). PCR using these primers was performed under the following conditions: denaturation at 93 °C for 1 min followed by 40 cycles of 93 °C for 20 s, 62 °C for 7 min, and extension at 72 °C for 10 min. For complete coverage of the entire mitochondrial genome with PCR products, two further primers, PvmtF2959 and PvmtR0, were also used in the genomic PCR.

As for genomic PCR of P. gonderi, four primers (PgeneralF2s, PgeneralR2, PgeneralF3s, and PgeneralR1s) were designed. PCR using these primers was performed under the following conditions: denaturation at 93 °C for 1 min followed by 40 cycles of 93 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 3 or 5 min, and extension at 72 °C for 10 min.

To amplify the whole mitochondrial genome from P. mexicanum, four PCR primers (PmemtF2, PmemtF3, PmemtR2, and PmemtR3) were designed based on the partial sequence of P. mexicanum cytochrome b gene (GenBank accession number AY099060). The PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 93 °C for 1 min followed by 40 cycles of 93 °C for 20 s; 60 °C for 1 min; 72 °C for 1 or 7 min; and extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The primer sequences used in this study are given in supplementary table 1 (Supplementary Material online).

The PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification Kit (Qiagen) and directly sequenced on an ABI 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The GenBank accession numbers of sequences determined in this study are given in table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Parasite Species Used in This Study

 
The complete or partial sequences of the mitochondrial genomes of Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, Plasmodium reichenowi, Plasmodium fragile, Plasmodium knowlesi, Plasmodium yoelii, Plasmodium chabaudi, Plasmodium relictum, Plasmodium gallinaceum, Plasmodium juxtanucleare, Plasmodium floridense, and Theileria parva were obtained from the NCBI Web site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in our analyses are given in table 1.

Sequence Analysis
DNASIS software (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to assemble sequences. There are three protein-coding genes on the Plasmodium mitochondrial genome: cytochrome c oxidase III, cytochrome c oxidase I, and cytochrome b genes (Aldritt et al. 1989Go; Vaidya et al. 1989Go). The entire mitochondrial genome is regarded as a single genetic unit in tracing evolutionary history because there is no evidence of recombination and positive selection (Joy et al. 2003Go). Thus, the amino acid sequences of the three gene products were concatenated and then used for our analyses. The lengths of concatenated amino acid sequences used were 1100–1167 amino acids (for the details, see supplementary table 2, Supplementary Material online). Phylogenetic tree construction and relative rate tests (Tajima 1993Go) were performed using MEGA2 software (Kumar et al. 2001Go). Branch length tests were performed using LINTREE program (Takezaki et al. 1995Go). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using Neighbor–Joining (Saitou and Nei 1987Go) and UPGMA methods with gamma distances. The gamma shape parameter ({alpha}) was estimated using the PAML program (Yang 1997Go).


    Results and Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Materials
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Phylogenetic Relationship among Plasmodium Species
We used the mitochondrial genome of Plasmodium species in this study. It contains three protein-coding genes involved in respiration: cytochrome c oxidase subunits I and III and cytochrome b genes (Aldritt et al. 1989Go; Vaidya et al. 1989Go). The mitochondrial genome undergoes no recombination and is free from positive selection pressure (Joy et al. 2003Go). It has previously been reported that the differences in G + C content between sequences can bias the estimation of tree topology due to codon usage difference (Sueoka 1961Go; Crozier RH and Crozier YC 1993Go). However, because the G + C content is similar among the mitochondrial genomes of all Plasmodium species used in this study (see supplementary table 2, Supplementary Material online), the possibility of such a topological bias needs not be considered here. Taken together, the mitochondrial genome is considered as an ideal target for phylogenetic analysis. A phylogenetic tree of 21 Plasmodium species including primate, rodent, bird, and reptile malaria parasites was constructed using the amino acid sequences of all three mitochondrial protein-coding genes (fig. 1). This phylogenetic tree demonstrates that the extant malaria parasite species can be divided into four major lineages based on host category: 1) P. malariae/P. ovale/P. hylobati/Old World monkey (OWM) parasites (primate parasite group 1), 2) rodent parasites, 3) P. falciparum/P. reichenowi (primate parasite group 2), and 4) bird/reptile parasites (fig. 1). The bird/reptile malaria parasite lineage (P. relictum, P. gallinaceum, P. juxtanucleare, P. mexicanum, and P. floridense) diverges from the other lineages at the root of the tree. The primate parasite group 2 lineage branches off from the primate parasite group 1 lineage/rodent parasite lineage, followed by the divergence of primate parasite group 1 lineage from the rodent parasites (P. yoelii and P. chabaudi). The primate parasite group 1 lineage consists of two sublineages: two human malaria parasites, P. malariae and P. ovale, compose one sublineage (fig. 1) and another sublineage consists of one human malaria parasite (P. vivax), a gibbon malaria parasite (P. hylobati), and the OWM malaria parasites (P. gonderi, P. cynomolgi, P. simiovale, P. fieldi, P. inui, P. fragile, P. coatneyi, and P. knowlesi). Within the sublineage containing OWM parasites, an African OWM malaria parasite, P. gonderi, is the earliest to diverge from the others, showing separate Asian and African clades of OWM malaria parasites. The overall phylogenetic relationship shown in figure 1 is generally consistent with those previously obtained from cytochrome b, small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA), and circumsporozoite protein genes (CSP) (Escalante and Ayala 1994Go; Escalante et al. 1995Go, 1998Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1.— The phylogenetic relationships between primate, rodent, and bird malaria parasites. Neighbor–Joining tree of amino acid sequences of three mitochondrial genes was constructed with gamma distance ({alpha} = 0.3). Numbers on the phylogenetic tree represent bootstrap values based on 1000 replications. The Plasmodium species used here can be divided into two groups depending on mutation rate: groups A and B. Species with stars are members of group A and the rest of the species belong to group B.

 
Recently, these separate clades of OWM malaria parasites have been contradicted based on the genomic deletion (~100 bp) shared between P. gonderi, P. simiovale, and P. cynomolgi (Roy and Irimia 2008Go). However, the complete sequences of these three malaria parasites that we obtained in this study have no such genomic deletion. The reported "deletion" probably corresponds to a short region of sequence encompassing the priming sites that were originally used to obtain the near-complete mitochondrial genome sequences by the original sequence depositors (Mu et al. 2005Go). We therefore conclude that separate Asian and African clades of OWM parasites are well supported in our analysis.

Comparison of Evolution between Malaria Parasites and Their Hosts
A comparison of the phylogenetic tree of malaria parasites with that of their hosts reveals two topological matches (fig. 2). One match lies between P. gonderi–Asian OWM malaria parasites and African OWMs–Asian OWMs (either macaque or colobine monkeys) (fig. 2B). Another match is seen between the P. falciparumP. reichenowi and human–chimpanzee relationships (fig. 2C). It is therefore assumed that parasite–host codivergence occurred between OWM malaria parasites and OWMs and between P. falciparum/P. reichenowi and humans/chimpanzees.


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 2.— Comparison of phylogenetic trees between parasites and hosts. (A) Parasite tree and host tree. The phylogenetic tree shown in figure 1 is simplified here and shown as the parasite tree. Host category is given in parentheses on the parasite tree on the basis of Coatney et al. (2003)Go. Note that Plasmodium vivax is considered to have become a human parasite by a host-switch event from an OWM parasite (Escalante et al. 2005Go; Mu et al. 2005Go). Also, Plasmodium hylobati is most closely related to Plasmodium inui, an Asian OWM parasite (see fig. 1), and can be maintained in Asian OWMs (Coatney et al. 2003Go). Hence, P. vivax and P. hylobati are evolutionarily regarded as members of Asian OWM parasites. Because Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale are possibly found from chimpanzees, Plasmodium falciparum is the sole parasite that infects only humans (Coatney et al. 2003Go). The phylogenetic relationships between primates, rodents, and birds are well characterized by both molecular and fossil record data (Kumar and Hedges 1998Go; Stewart and Disotell 1998Go; Bromham et al. 1999Go; Nei et al. 2001Go) and are summarized in the host tree. In this host tree, two OWMs, that is, macaque and colobine monkeys, are subdivided into African and Asian groups. (B) Topological matches between OWM malaria parasites and their hosts. (C) A topological match between P. falciparumPlasmodium reichenowi and human–chimpanzee.

 
One possible mechanism for parasite–host codivergence is through geographical isolation of two populations of host species which consequently undergo divergence. This would also lead to the geographical isolation of the parasites of the two host populations, resulting in parasite species divergence. Geographical isolation is evidently considered as the evolutionary driving force in the Asian OWMs–African OWMs divergence (Stewart and Disotell 1998Go) but not in the human–chimpanzee divergence (contradiction between Coppens [1994Go] and McBrearty and Jablonski [2005Go]). It has been reported that both OWM malaria parasites and OWMs originated in Africa (Escalante et al. 1998Go; Stewart and Disotell 1998Go). Colobine and macaque monkeys migrated into the Eurasian continent from Africa 10 MYA and 6 MYA, respectively (Stewart and Disotell 1998Go), and became the ancestors of extant Asian OWM species. This evolutionary history means that the divergence between African OWMs and Asian OWMs was initiated by geographical isolation and that the ancestors of Asian OWM malaria parasites migrated into Eurasia along with their hosts. Asian OWM malaria parasite species infect both colobine and macaque monkeys (Coatney et al. 2003Go). It is, therefore, highly likely that the divergence between P. gonderi and Asian OWM malaria parasites was caused by intercontinental allopatric speciation along with their hosts either 6 or 10 MYA.

Divergence Times among Malaria Parasite Lineages
To obtain a reliable estimate of the divergence time of Plasmodium lineages, a molecular clock must be validated for the Plasmodium mitochondrial genome. We examined evolutionary rate constancy by performing relative rate tests (Tajima 1993Go) and branch length tests (Takezaki et al. 1995Go). The relative rate tests revealed consistent rates of amino acid substitution in P. vivax, P. cynomolgi, P. simiovale, P. fieldi, P. fragile, P. coatneyi, P. knowlesi, P. gonderi, and P. ovale (members of group A in fig. 1). Plasmodium malariae, P. inui and P. hylobati exhibit discrepancies in substitution rate compared with other OWM malaria parasites, P. vivax and P. ovale in relative rate tests. However, P. malariae, P inui, and P. hylobati show rate constancy with P. yoelii, P. chabaudi, P. falciparum, P. reichenowi, P. relictum, P. gallinaceum, P. juxtanucleare, P. mexicanum, and P. floridense in the branch length test using T. parva, a close relative of the malaria parasites, as an outgroup (group B in fig. 1). The Plasmodium species examined here can, therefore, be divided into two groups defined in terms of their substitution rates: group A and group B. Because a different molecular clock exists for each group, we constructed a UPGMA tree independently for each group in order to calculate divergence times (fig. 3). Such independent construction does not significantly affect the tree topology (see figs. 1 and 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 3.— Separate tree construction for two malaria parasite groups and the divergence times among malaria parasite lineages. A UPGMA tree was separately constructed for groups A and B because of a difference in mutation rates between the two groups. Numbers on the phylogenetic tree represent bootstrap values based on 1000 replications. The time frame for parasite evolution is given under the trees. The timing calculation was performed by assuming that the divergence time between Plasmodium gonderi and Asian malaria parasites is 6 or 10 Myr. The open circle indicates the calibration time point used for the timing calculation. (A) The UPGMA tree ({alpha} = 0.1) of group A. (B) The UPGMA tree ({alpha} = 0.3) of group B.

 
One reliable calibration point for malaria parasite evolution is the divergence time between P. gonderi and Asian OWM malaria parasites. As mentioned above, P. gonderi–Asian OWM parasites divergence occurred either 6 or 10 MYA. Because P. gonderi and most Asian OWM malaria parasites belong to group A, we initially calculated the divergence times for this group by examining the genetic distances between species. The average pairwise genetic distance (db distance) between P. gonderi and Asian OWM malaria parasites is 0.0251 ± 0.0051 and that between P. ovale and OWM malaria parasites is 0.0488 ± 0.0079 (table 2). Assuming that the db distance between P. gonderi and Asian OWM malaria parasites corresponds to either 6 or 10 Myr, the divergence time between P. ovale and OWM malaria parasites is either 12 or 19 Myr (see table 2 and fig. 3A). The divergence time between P. ovale and OWM malaria parasites in group A is identical to that between P. malariae and P. inui/P. hylobati in group B (see fig. 1). To calculate the divergence times for group B, we therefore used 12 or 19 Myr for the divergence time between P. malariae and P. inui/P. hylobati (corresponding genetic distance of 0.0765 ± 0.0096; see table 2) as the calibration point. The db distance between P. malariae/P. inui/P. hylobati and rodent malaria parasites (P. chabaudi and P. yoelii), which is 0.1033 ± 0.0103, yields a divergence time of 16.2 ± 1.6 Myr or 25.7 ± 2.6 Myr (table 2 and fig. 3B). The db distances between P. falciparum/P. reichenowi and P. malariae/P. inui/P. hylobati/rodent malaria species (0.1280 ± 0.0115) and between bird/reptile malaria parasites and others (0.1545 ± 0.0128) gives 20.1 ± 1.8 Myr or 31.8 ± 2.9 Myr and 24.2 ± 2.0 Myr or 38.4 ± 3.2 Myr, respectively (table 2 and fig. 3B).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Divergence Timings among Malaria Parasite Lineages

 
The four major malaria parasite lineages, primate parasite group 1, primate parasite group 2, rodent parasites, and bird/reptile malaria parasites, diverged rapidly during the early phase of the evolution of the extant malaria parasite lineages (incipient rapid diversification; see fig. 4). The estimated timing of this incipient rapid diversification is either 16–24 MYA or 26–38 MYA. Surprisingly, this timing is much later than the divergence times of their hosts (75–310 MYA; 75 Myr of primate–rodent divergence; 310 Myr of mammal–bird divergence; Kumar and Hedges 1998Go; Bromham et al. 1999Go; Nei et al. 2001Go; Waterston et al. 2002Go; fig. 4). This large discrepancy in divergence times between parasites and hosts indicates that the incipient rapid diversification was not caused by codivergence along with hosts. Host-switch events, therefore, must have contributed to the rapid divergence between the four major parasite lineages.


Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 4.— Evolution of malaria parasite lineages and their host lineages. Parasite divergence times based on a calibration point of 10 Myr are employed here (see main text for details). Divergence times between host lineages are based on Kumar and Hedges (1998)Go, Bromham et al. (1999)Go, Nei et al. (2001)Go, and Waterston et al. (2002)Go. The shaded areas represent the period of the incipient rapid diversification of extant malaria parasite lineages. The double-headed arrow indicates the period of rapid radiation of mammalian genera (Bininda-Emonds et al. 2007Go). OP, origin of placental superorders and orders (~93 Myr; Bininda-Emonds et al. 2007Go); KT, Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary (extinction of dinosaurs) (65 Myr; Bininda-Emonds et al. 2007Go); PETM, Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum (~55 Myr; Gingerich 2006Go).

 
The use of 6 or 10 Myr as a calibration point, that is, the divergence time of the P. gonderi and the Asian OWM malaria parasite species, gives 2.5 ± 0.6 Myr or 4.0 ± 0.9 Myr for the P. falciparumP. reichenowi divergence time, respectively (table 2). Because the latter value (4.0 ± 0.9 Myr) is closer to the accepted human–chimpanzee divergence time (5–7 Myr; Haile-Selassie 2001Go; Brunet et al. 2002Go), the calibration time of 10 Myr is more likely considering the parasite–host topological match between the P. falciparumP. reichenowi and human–chimpanzee relationships (fig. 2C). Also, the use of 10 Myr is supported by the fact that the diversification timing of Asian OWM malaria parasites (6.3 ± 1.4 Myr; see fig. 3A and table 2) is consistent with the time at which colobine fossils become abundant in Southern Asia (7 MYA; Stewart and Disotell 1998Go).

The previous estimates of parasite divergence times based on the phylogenetic trees of the SSU rRNA and CSP genes are much older than our estimates (Escalante and Ayala 1994Go; Escalante et al. 1995Go). For example, the divergence time of OWM parasites/rodent parasites/P. malariae and P. falciparum/P. reichenowi is 165 Myr, whereas it is 32 or 20 Myr in this study. However, these older estimates have suffered from weaknesses in methodology that were previously accepted for compelling reasons: these are 1) the application of an evolutionary rate obtained from prokaryotic endosymbionts of aphids (1% or 2% per 50 Myr in the SSU rRNA gene) to malaria parasites and 2) the unexamined adoption of the same mutation rate in the gene to all Plasmodium lineages. In contrast, our estimation of divergence times is free from these methodological weaknesses.

We compared amino acid substitution rates between mitochondrial genes and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) gene, a housekeeping gene of nuclear genome. The substitution rates in mitochondrial genes from both groups A and B are comparable to that of the G3PDH gene (see supplementary table 3, Supplementary Material online). It seems unlikely, therefore, that the mitochondrial genes show exceptionally high or low rates of amino acid substitution compared with housekeeping genes of nuclear genome.

A Possible Scenario of Malaria Parasite–Host Coevolution
Our estimation of parasite divergence times has led us to conclude that the incipient rapid diversification began around the latter half of Eocene epoch (fig. 4). A dramatic radiation of mammalian genera occurred at the Eocene epoch (Bininda-Emonds et al. 2007Go), resulting in an abundance of new potential host species (see fig. 4). This acceleration of mammalian diversification continued into the Oligocene epoch (Bininda-Emonds et al. 2007Go) and coincides with the incipient rapid diversification of extant malaria parasite lineages (see fig. 4). Thus, the incipient rapid diversification of extant malaria parasite lineages could have been a consequence of the adaptive radiation to new mammalian hosts via host-switch events. Because the mammalian malaria parasite and bird/reptile malaria parasite lineages diverged at the root of the phylogenetic tree (see figs. 1, 3B, and 4), the common ancestor of the extant malaria parasites is most likely to have been a bird or reptile malaria parasite.

This study demonstrates that host-switch events principally drove the evolution of the extant Plasmodium species and highlights the parasite's ability to switch between host species, which has been previously underestimated, as an important adaptive trait of the parasite.


    Supplementary Materials
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Materials
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Supplementary tables 13 are available at Molecular Biology and Evolution online (http://www.mbe.oxfordjournals.org/).


    Acknowledgements
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Materials
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We gratefully acknowledge Yoko Satta for valuable comments on the manuscript and advice on analyses. We thank Naoko Takezaki for technical advice and Naoko Sakihama for technical assistance. We thank Joseph J. Schall for providing samples of Plasmodium mexicanum and reading this manuscript and Satoru Kawai for providing genomic DNA of Plasmodium coatneyi. This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology grant (19790306 to T. Hayakawa; 20390120, 18073013, and 18GS03140013 to K.T.).


    Footnotes
 
1 Present address: Department of Protozoology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan. Back

Koichiro Tamura, Associate Editor Back


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Materials
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

    Aldritt SM, Joseph JT, Wirth DF. Sequence identification of cytochrome b in Plasmodium gallinaceum. Mol Cell Biol (1989) 9:3614–3620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Bininda-Emonds OR, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RD, Beck RM, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature (2007) 446:507–512.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Bromham L, Phillips MJ, Penny D. Growing up with dinosaurs: molecular dates and the mammalian radiation. Trends Ecol Evol (1999) 14:113–118.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Brunet M, Guy F, Pilbeam D, et al, (38 co-authors). A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa. Nature (2002) 418:145–151.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Coatney GR, Collins WE, Warren M, Contacos PG. CD-ROM. The primate malarias [original book published 1971]. (2003) Atlanta (GA): CDC.

    Coppens Y. East side story: the origin of humankind. Sci Am (1994) 270:88–95.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Crozier RH, Crozier YC. The mitochondrial genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera: complete sequence and genome organization. Genetics (1993) 133:97–117.[Abstract]

    Escalante AA, Ayala FJ. Phylogeny of the malarial genus Plasmodium, derived from rRNA gene sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1994) 91:11373–11377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Escalante AA, Barrio E, Ayala FJ. Evolutionary origin of human and primate malarias: evidence from the circumsporozoite protein gene. Mol Biol Evol (1995) 12:616–626.[Abstract]

    Escalante AA, Cornejo OE, Freeland DE, Poe AC, Durrego E, Collins WE, Lal AA. A monkey's tale: the origin of Plasmodium vivax as a human malaria parasite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2005) 102:1980–1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Escalante AA, Freeland DE, Collins WE, Lal AA. The evolution of primate malaria parasites based on the gene encoding cytochrome b from the linear mitochondrial genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1998) 95:8124–8129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Gingerich PD. Environment and evolution through the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum. Trends Ecol Evol (2006) 21:246–253.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Haile-Selassie Y. Late Miocene hominids from the Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature (2001) 412:178–181.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Joy DA, Feng X, Mu J, et al, (12 co-authors). Early origin and recent expansion of Plasmodium falciparum. Science (2003) 300:318–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kumar S, Hedges SB. A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature (1998) 392:917–920.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics (2001) 17:1244–1245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Levine ND. The protozoan phylum Apicomplexa (1988) CRC Press, Boca Raton (FL).

    Martinsen ES, Perkins SL, Schall JJ. A three-genome phylogeny of malaria parasites (Plasmodium and closely related genera): evolution of life-history traits and host switches. Mol Phylogenet Evol (2008) 47:261–273.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    McBrearty S, Jablonski NG. First fossil chimpanzee. Nature (2005) 437:105–108.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Mu J, Joy DA, Duan J, et al, (11 co-authors). Host switch leads to emergence of Plasmodium vivax malaria in humans. Mol Biol Evol (2005) 22:1686–1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Nei M, Xu P, Glazko G. Estimation of divergence times from multiprotein sequences for a few mammalian species and several distantly related organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2001) 98:2497–2502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Roy SW, Irimia M. Origins of human malaria: rare genomic changes and full mitochondrial genomes confirm the relationship of Plasmodium falciparum to other mammalian parasites but complicate the origins of Plasmodium vivax. Mol Biol Evol (2008) 25:1192–1198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol (1987) 4:406–425.[Abstract]

    Stewart CB, Disotell TR. Primate evolution—in and out of Africa. Curr Biol (1998) 8:R582–R588.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Sueoka N. Correlation between base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid and amino acid composition of protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1961) 47:1141–1149.[Free Full Text]

    Tajima F. Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis. Genetics (1993) 135:599–607.[Abstract]

    Takezaki N, Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees. Mol Biol Evol (1995) 12:823–833.[Abstract]

    Vaidya AB, Akella R, Suplick K. Sequences similar to genes for two mitochondrial proteins and portions of ribosomal RNA in tandemly arrayed 6-kilobase-pair DNA of a malarial parasite. Mol Biochem Parasitol (1989) 35:97–107.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Waters AP, Higgins DG, McCutchan TF. Plasmodium falciparum appears to have arisen as a result of lateral transfer between avian and human hosts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1991) 88:3140–3144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, et al, (222 co-authors). Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature (2002) 420:520–562.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Yang Z. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci (1997) 13:555–556.[Free Full Text]

Accepted for publication July 29, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/10/2233    most recent
msn171v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayakawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayakawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?