Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 29, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(11):2454-2464; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm179
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/11/2454    most recent
msm179v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garb, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, C. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garb, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, C. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Expansion and Intragenic Homogenization of Spider Silk Genes since the Triassic: Evidence from Mygalomorphae (Tarantulas and Their Kin) Spidroins

Jessica E. Garb*, Teresa DiMauro*, Randolph V. Lewis{dagger} and Cheryl Y. Hayashi*

* Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside
{dagger} Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie

E-mail: jessica.garb{at}ucr.edu.


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Spiders spin a diverse array of silk fibers that are predominately composed of repetitive proteins (spidroins) encoded by a gene family. Characterization of this gene family has focused on spidroins synthesized by the Araneomorphae (true spiders), whereas only a single sequence is known from the Mygalomorphae (tarantulas and their kin). To better understand the diversity and evolution of the spidroin gene family, we surveyed the silk gland transcriptomes of 4 divergent mygalomorph species. Through expressed sequence tag screening and probing of silk gland cDNA libraries, we discovered 6 novel mygalomorph spidroins and an ~8-kb cDNA of the previously reported Euagrus chisoseus fibroin 1. Mygalomorph spidroin cDNAs encode tandem iterations of sequence repeats, followed by a nonrepetitive carboxy-terminal domain. Though highly homogenized at the nucleotide level within a cDNA (89–100% identical), these repeats exhibit extensive variation across spidroins, consistent with intragenic repeats evolving in concert. Extreme homogeneity of intragenic repeats is also characteristic of araneomorph spidroins, suggesting that modular architecture and its maintenance through concerted evolution have persisted since the mygalomorph/araneomorph split (≥240 MYA). Phylogenetic analyses of C-terminal sequences grouped all mygalomorph spidroins, except Aliatypus fibroin 1, in a clade. Aliatypus fibroin 1 was instead more closely related to a subset of araneomorph spidroins, including those used in prey wrapping. Our results suggest that spidroin paralogs existed prior to the divergence of mygalomorphs and araneomorphs, followed by a far greater expansion of this gene family in araneomorphs, paralleling the dramatic functional diversification of their silk gland anatomy.

Key Words: concerted evolution • fibroin • gene family • Mygalomorphae • silk • spider


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
With more than 39,000 described species and a 400-Myr-old fossil record, spiders (order Araneae) constitute an ancient and extremely prolific animal radiation (Shear et al. 1989Go; Coddington et al. 2004Go; Platnick 2007Go). The evolutionary success of spiders is often attributed to their utilization of high-performance silks for a variety of ecological functions, along with a spectacular diversification of silk-spinning organs, fibers, and constructs (Schulz 1987Go; Craig 2003Go). Spiders spin silks from proteins secreted in specialized abdominal glands that vary in number and morphology across species. For example, an individual araneoid spider (ecribellate orb weaver) can possess up to 7 morphologically distinct types of silk glands, each of which synthesizes a different set of proteins that assemble into a task-specific silk (e.g., web-building silks, egg case silk, prey-wrapping silk; Guerette et al. 1996Go). Nearly all spider silk cDNAs characterized to date have the common structural organization of long (~4 to 16 kb), highly repetitive sequence flanked by short, nonrepetitive amino and carboxy-termini encoding regions (Gatesy et al. 2001Go; Motriuk-Smith et al. 2005Go). These transcripts generate proteins, termed spider fibroins or spidroins, that not only share sequence similarity in their nonrepetitive termini but also exhibit extreme divergence in their repetitive regions. This pattern is consistent with spidroins being encoded by members of a gene family that have undergone functional specialization (Beckwitt and Arcidiacono 1994Go; Hayashi et al. 2004Go). Characterization of this gene family has focused on spidroins from the Araneoidea (~10,000 species; e.g., orb-web and cob-web weavers), a lineage within the infraorder Araneomorphae (true spiders: ~37,000 species), whereas little is known of spidroins from the araneomorph sister group, the Mygalomorphae (tarantulas and their kin: ~2,500 species).

The infraorder Mygalomorphae is composed of large, relatively sedentary spiders that primarily dwell in silk-lined burrows (Hedin and Bond 2006Go). Mygalomorphs share many morphological and ecological similarities with the Mesothelae, the spider lineage that is sister to Opisthothelae (Mygalomorphae + Araneomorphae; Platnick and Gertsch 1976Go; Coddington et al. 2004Go). Mesotheles and mygalomorphs possess a number of primitive features, including those associated with silk production (Haupt and Kovoor 1993Go). In contrast to araneomorphs, mygalomorphs have a comparatively undifferentiated spinning apparatus consisting of uniform spigots that lead to 1–3 types of globular silk glands (Palmer et al. 1982Go; Palmer 1985Go). Yet mygalomorphs utilize silk for a variety of ecological functions, including burrow construction, egg protection, and prey capture (Coyle 1986Go; Schulz 1987Go). Thus, unlike araneomorph spiders that have evolved a multitude of task-specific fiber types, mygalomorphs appear to draw upon a small number of generalized silks for different purposes.

To date, a single spidroin cDNA has been identified from one mygalomorph species, Euagrus chisoseus, based on sequence similarity of its carboxy (C)-terminus to araneomorph spidroin C-termini (Gatesy et al. 2001Go). This finding established the widespread distribution and antiquity of the spidroin gene family, which must predate the divergence of mygalomorphs and araneomorphs at least 240 MYA (Selden and Gall 1992Go). The sequence of this spidroin (E. chisoseus fibroin 1) suggests a repetitive organization, also similar to the tandem arrays that typify araneomorph spidroins. Within a sequence, araneomorph spidroins contain iterations of highly homogenized repeats (e.g., 98–100% identical at the nucleotide level), a pattern generally explained as a consequence of concerted evolution resulting from nonreciprocal recombination (gene conversion) or unequal crossing over among intragenic repeats (Beckwitt et al. 1998Go; Hayashi et al. 2004Go).

In contrast to the striking uniformity of repeats within a spidroin, repeats from paralogs often radically differ in their sequence characteristics (Gatesy et al. 2001Go; Hayashi et al. 2004Go). An individual spidroin can be represented by its consensus ensemble repeat unit (a consensus of its translated intragenic repeats), that across paralogs can range in length from ~28 to 357 amino acids (Garb et al. 2006Go; fig. 1). Some spidroin ensemble repeats are low-complexity sequences (2–3 different residues accounting for >80% of each repeat), dominated by short amino acid motifs (e.g., An, [GA]n, GGX, and/or GPXn, where X = a subset of amino acids). These motifs are poorly represented in other ensemble repeats, which instead contain longer sequences (180–357 amino acids) with less compositional bias (Hayashi et al. 2004Go). The mygalomorph spidroin E. chisoseus fibroin 1 has an ~345-amino acid ensemble unit that most closely resembles this latter class of repeats in its overall length and sequence complexity. At this stage, it is unknown whether the characteristics of this sequence are unique to Euagrus or representative of other mygalomorph spidroins.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1.— Members of the spider silk fibroin (spidroin) family exhibit a diversity of repeat sequences. (a) Schematic organization of a spidroin primary sequence: each contains an ~100-amino acid nonrepetitive amino (N)- and carboxy (C)-terminus, whereas the intervening sequence is composed of tandem-iterated repeat modules. (b) Consensus ensemble repeat (a consensus sequence of repeat modules) from 3 black widow spider (Latrodectus hesperus) spidroins (dragline silk proteins, MaSp1 and MaSp2; egg case silk protein, TuSp1) compared with the mygalomorph spidroin, Euagrus chisoseus fibroin 1. Within a spidroin sequence, repeat modules are extremely similar. Across spidroins, ensemble repeats widely vary in sequence length and complexity (i.e., diversity of amino acids). Each ensemble is followed by its length in amino acids and the number of different amino acids it contains (# diff. aa).

 
To better understand the diversity and evolution of spidroins, we surveyed the silk gland transcriptomes of 4 mygalomorph species distributed in divergent families. As a result, we characterized 6 novel mygalomorph spidroin cDNAs and report an ~8-kb cDNA of E. chisoseus fibroin 1, which substantially extends its available sequence and offers additional insights into the modular nature of spider silk proteins. We compared these new mygalomorph spidroins to published araneomorph sequences and estimated their phylogenetic relationships in order to investigate spidroin gene family diversification and repeat evolution across spiders.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Taxon Sampling
We obtained multiple individuals of Bothriocyrtum californicum (Ctenizidae) from Mission Trails, San Diego, CA (San Diego Co.); Aliatypus plutonis (Antrodiaetidae) and Aptostichus sp. (Cyrtaucheniidae) from the Box Spring Mountains, Riverside, CA (Riverside Co.); and E. chisoseus (Dipluridae) from the Santa Rita Mountains, upper Madera Creek, AZ (Santa Cruz Co.). Current phylogenetic hypotheses for the Mygalomorphae indicate that these families broadly span the infraorder (Raven 1985Go; Goloboff 1993Go; Hedin and Bond 2006Go; Ayoub et al. 2007Go). All studies agree that Antrodiaetidae belongs to the Atypoidea (or Atypoidina sensu Raven 1985Go), the sister lineage to the Orthopalpae, a group that includes most other mygalomorph families. Within the Orthopalpae, morphological characters place Ctenizidae and Cyrtaucheniidae in the Rastelloidina (Raven 1985Go; Goloboff 1993Go). Moreover, both morphological (Goloboff 1993Go) and molecular data (Hedin and Bond 2006Go; Ayoub et al. 2007Go) suggest that Dipluridae is in a basal position within the Orthopalpae.

cDNA library construction required us to combine multiple individuals of each species. However, the collected Aptostichus specimens could not be unambiguously diagnosed at the species level using morphological characters (Hedin M, personal communication). Because multiple Aptostichus species have been recorded from our collecting locality, we amplified and sequenced fragments of mitochondrial 16S rRNA from each individual. Two Aptostichus specimens having identical 16S sequences were combined for the library's starting material. Vouchers were retained at –80 °C in the personal collection of the authors.

Molecular Methods
We dissected total silk gland tissue from live spiders anesthetized with CO2. Silk glands were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C. Total RNA was extracted from the tissue by homogenization in Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), followed by purification using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Oligo-(dT)25–tagged magnetic beads (Dynal Biotech, Brown Deer, WI) were used to isolate mRNA from total RNA. From mRNA extractions, cDNA was synthesized by the SuperScript II Choice protocol (Invitrogen) using an anchored oligo-(dT)18V (V = A or C or G) primer. cDNA fragments were size-fractionated with a ChromaSpin 1,000 column (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) to enrich for transcripts ≥1,000 bp. Size-selected cDNAs were ligated into EcoRV (NEB, Ipswich, MA)-digested pZErO-2 plasmids (Invitrogen) and transformed into TOP10 Escherichia coli cells (Invitrogen) by electroporation. For each species, ~1,800 recombinant E. coli colonies were arrayed in long-term storage plates.

Each library was replicated onto nylon filters for screening with {gamma}32P-labeled oligonucleotide probes. All libraries were probed with GCDGCDGCDGCDGCDGC and CCWGCWCCWGCWCCWGCWCC (sequences shown 5'–3'), which have previously been employed to locate silk cDNAs (Gatesy et al. 2001Go; Garb and Hayashi 2005Go). To identify additional spidroin cDNAs not found through initial rounds of probing, ~30% of each library was scored for insert size, and cDNAs ≥500 bp were sequenced with the T7 or Sp6 universal primers. Library-specific probes were designed from putative spidroin cDNAs (identified from the mygalomorph libraries through size screening) and used to screen the libraries. These new probes were 1) CGGATTGGAACTCCTTCAGC, 2) CGCCGAGTTTACTAAGTGTGAAGC, 3) TGTCGTTGCCAATGAAGC, 4) ATGAGGCTGAAGCKGCAGATG, 5) ATGCSAGATTGCTGGCTTC, 6) TTGCTGCTGCTGTAGATGTGGC, 7) CAGAGATACACCTAAAGCACTACC, 8) TTGTCGTTGTGCTTGTGG, 9) CCAAGGGCAGAAATGAAATC (1–9 for B. californicum); 10) GTTTGCGAAAGAAGCGTTC, 11) CAGATAGCGGAATGTCGTG, 12) AGAGGTGAGTATGGCGTTCTC, 13) CTACTGAAGATGCGGTTATGCC (10–13 for Aptostichus sp.); and 14) GAGCCTATTCCGGTAGATCGCCA, 15) CCCGATGTCACTCTTTCCAC, 16) GGCGTTAGCGGTGTTCAATC, 17) CTTGATGCTGCTCCCGATGCTGAT (14–17 for A. plutonis).

Restriction enzyme digests were utilized to determine the longest cDNA insert of each spidroin type. Because each clone contained highly repetitive sequence, it was not possible to "walk" down entire inserts with internal primers. Instead, clones were completely sequenced in both directions using the transposon-based GPS-1 Genome Priming System (NEB); a complete contig of each clone was then assembled.

Sequence Analyses
Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were initially subjected to translated-Blast queries (BlastX; Altschul et al. 1997Go) against the National Center for Biotechnology Information protein database. All nucleotide sequences were subsequently grouped into nonredundant clusters using BLASTCLUST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/docs/blastclust.html; similarity threshold = 60, minimum length coverage = 0.5). From the longest clone in each spidroin sequence cluster, we searched for tandem repeats using the EMBOSS programs, equicktandem and etandem (Rice et al. 2000Go). Etandem searches were conducted by screening for short tandem repeats (3–39 bp) and for longer repeats in the size range identified by equicktandem (extending search range by 50 bp upstream and downstream of estimated sizes). Subsequences retrieved from etandem searches were considered intragenic repeats if they were over 85% identical to their consensus (Verstrepen et al. 2005Go). Amino acid repeats were determined from conceptually translated cDNAs by visual searches and by using the RADAR program (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Radar/; Heger and Holm 2000Go). Repeat ensembles were generated by aligning translated sequences of repeats within a spidroin and determining the majority-rule consensus, with an "X" denoting equivocal positions. Predicted amino acid compositions were computed with MacVector 7.2 (Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA).

To determine the phylogenetic relationships of mygalomorph spidroins relative to other gene family members, the sequences reported here were analyzed with published spidroin cDNAs. Phylogenetic analyses of spidroins have largely been conducted with sequences containing the nonrepetitive C-terminal domain (~100 amino acids before stop codon), as repetitive sequences are problematic to align (Gatesy et al. 2001Go). The nonrepetitive N-terminal domain also provides conserved sequence for phylogenetic analyses (Motriuk-Smith et al. 2005Go; Rising et al. 2006Go). However, N-termini are much less common than C-termini among published cDNAs. Spidroin cDNAs appear to be more reliable than some sequences obtained via polymerase chain reaction because of occasional contamination (e.g., Tai et al. 2004Go; see supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online). For these reasons, we selected cDNAs containing C-termini from all available major araneomorph lineages. These sequences included every functionally distinct type of spidroin and all unique repetitive organizations reported to date. Specifically, we sampled Argiope trifasciata (A.t.), A.t. AcSp1 (GenBank accession number: AY426339 [GenBank] ), A.t. Flag (AF350264 [GenBank] ); Nephila clavipes (N.c.), N.c. MiSp1 (AF027735 [GenBank] ); Latrodectus hesperus (L.h.), L.h. MaSp1 (AY953074 [GenBank] ), L.h. MaSp2 (AY953075), and L.h. TuSp1 (AY953070); Deinopis spinosa (D.s.), D.s. TuSp1 (AY953073), D.s. Flag (DQ399325), D.s. MaSp2a (DQ399328), D.s. MiSp1 (DQ399324), D.s. fibroin 1a (DQ399326), and D.s. fibroin 2 (DQ399323); Uloborus diversus (U.d.), U.d. MaSp1 (DQ399331) and U.d. AcSp1 (DQ399333); Agelenopsis aperta (A.ap.), A.ap. fibroin 1 (AY566305 [GenBank] ); Dolomedes tenebrosus (D.t.), D.t. fibroin 1 (AF350269); Plectreurys tristis (P.t.), P.t. fibroin 1P.t. fibroin 4 (AF350281–AF350284); and E. chisoseus (E.c.), E.c. fibroin 1 (AF350271). The name of a spidroin gene or protein is designated by an abbreviation of the gland that it was initially isolated from (Ma = major ampullate, Mi = minor ampullate, Tu = tubuliform, Ac = aciniform, and Flag = flagelliform), preceding "Sp" for spidroin. Spidroin genes and proteins that cannot be assigned to these ortholog groups (e.g., E. chisoseus fibroin 1) are labeled "fibroin #," where numbers indicate different paralogs.

Amino acid sequences of C-terminal domains were first aligned with ClustalW (Higgins et al. 1994Go), implemented in MacVector, using default settings. This initial alignment was subsequently visually refined. For phylogenetic analyses, alignment gaps were treated as either missing data or as additional presence/absence characters recoded using the "simple" method of Simmons and Ochoterena (2000)Go in SEQSTATE (Müller 2005Go). Maximum parsimony analyses were conducted with heuristic searches in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2006Go), including 10,000 random-taxon-addition (RTA) replicates. Nodal support was assessed by 10,000 bootstrap (BS) replicates with 10 RTA per replicate and decay indices (DIs). Bayesian analyses of the C-termini alignment were performed with MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001Go), employing the Jones, Taylor, and Thornton (JTT) substitution model with a gamma parameter for among-site rate variation. The JTT substitution model was chosen based on the results of a preliminary Bayesian analysis using a mixture of fixed rate amino acid models, which indicated that the JTT model had the highest posterior probability (PP). Bayesian tree searches were executed for 3 x 106 generations, sampling trees every 1,000 generations (split frequencies fell below 0.01). Clade PP values were determined from a 50% majority-rule consensus of post burn-in trees (750,000 generations). Tree files for every possible root placement were generated in MacClade 4.0 (Maddison DR and Maddison WP 2000Go). Using the program GeneTree 1.3 (Page 1998Go), all rooting scenarios for the spidroin tree(s) were compared with reference to a fixed species phylogeny of the sampled taxa; our estimate of the species tree was based on Coddington et al. (2004)Go. The number of gene duplication and loss events required to reconcile each root placement with the species tree was computed using the "show gene tree costs" command. Topologies that minimized gene duplications and losses were selected as preferred rooting scenarios.


    Results and Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Mygalomorph Spidroin Diversity
Using oligonucleotide probing and EST sequencing, we identified spidroin transcripts from the 4 mygalomorph spider silk gland cDNA libraries (GenBank accession number EU117159-EU117165). Each library yielded one or more sequence clusters, representatives of which could be conceptually translated into distinct spidroin-like polypeptides. All of these sequences had a single open reading frame that translated into repeating blocks of amino acids, followed by a nonrepetitive C-terminal domain (fig. 2). BlastX searches conducted with these C-terminal sequences returned previously reported spidroin sequences with C-termini as top matches.


Figure 2
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 2.— (a) Schematic organization of mygalomorph spidroins: all are partial sequences encoding tandem-iterated repeat modules and a nonrepetitive C-terminal domain "C." The ellipsis (...) before the first depicted repeat module indicates predicted additional sequence not found in cDNA clones. (b) Consensus ensemble repeat sequence (majority-rule consensus of tandem repeats, an X indicating equivocal positions) of each spidroin followed by its repeat length and the length of the entire cDNA. Homopolymer runs of alanine (An), serine (Sn), and threonine (Tn) are colored red, purple, and green, respectively. A portion of Euagrus fibroin 1's ensemble sequence is bordered in gray to indicate the subrepeat referred to in (c). (c) An alignment of subrepeats within Euagrus fibroin 1 identified by RADAR; asterisks above alignment indicate identical positions. (d) Alignment of the C-termini from mygalomorph spidroins in interleaved format.

 
In total, we found 6 novel mygalomorph spidroins and sequenced an ~8-kb cDNA of E. chisoseus fibroin 1. From A. plutonis, we identified a single cluster of spidroin cDNAs, the longest of which was 4,729 bp (A. plutonis fibroin 1). The Aptostichus sp. silk gland library contained 2 spidroin sequence clusters, corresponding to at least 2 paralogous cDNAs: Aptostichus sp. fibroin 1 (3,388 bp) and fibroin 2 (2,411 bp). Screens of the B. californicum library revealed 3 paralogous spidroins: B. californicum fibroin 1 (1,873 bp), fibroin 2 (2,871 bp), and fibroin 3 (3,731 bp). The E. chisoseus silk gland cDNA library constructed by Gatesy et al. (2001)Go had 191 probe-positive clones. All sequenced Euagrus probe-positive cDNAs, including the 7,987-bp transcript that we report here, were extremely similar to the published E. chisoseus fibroin 1. This new cDNA extends the available data for E. chisoseus fibroin 1 by ~5.8 kb and overlaps with the sequence of Gatesy et al. (2001)Go over 2,144 bp. Where they overlap, these 2 sequences differ at 14 sites (8 synonymous, 3 nonsynonymous, and 1 trinucleotide insertion/deletion [indel]), well within the reported range of allelic variation of spidroin genes (Beckwitt et al. 1998Go).

Analyses using etandem found that each mygalomorph spidroin cDNA contained long, tandem repeats ranging in length from 507 to 1,026 bp across sequences. Similarly, RADAR identified repeats at the amino acid level corresponding to the same dimensions and periodicities of those found by etandem. Like E. chisoseus fibroin 1, all other mygalomorph spidroins are characterized by a long ensemble repeat (169–183 amino acids). Euagrus chisoseus fibroin 1's ensemble is approximately twice the length of the others (342 amino acids; fig. 2b), but RADAR also recognized subrepeats within E. chisoseus fibroin 1, each one half the length of the larger ensemble (fig. 2c). When aligned, these subrepeats share 56% identity over 178 sites, suggesting that the greater length of E. chisoseus fibroin 1's ensemble may be explained by a duplication of an ancestral repeat similar in length to those found in other mygalomorph spidroins, followed by homogenization of this larger unit throughout the gene. Alternatively, a shift may have occurred in the periodicity of intragenic recombination tracts (i.e., from ~500 to ~1000 bp) in an ancestral silk gene already composed of serial repeats in the size range of those found in other mygalomorph spidroins (~500 bp).

Ensemble repeats of the different mygalomorph spidroins could not be readily decomposed into the simple amino acid sequence motifs (GA)n, GGX, and/or GPXn that dominate certain araneomorph spidroins (e.g., the dragline silk proteins MaSp1 and MaSp2, the orb-web temporary scaffold protein MiSp, and the orb-web capture spiral protein Flag). However, the polyalanine (An) motifs, found in MaSp1, MaSp2, and MiSp (Gatesy et al. 2001Go), are well represented in Euagrus and Bothriocyrtum sequences but are less abundant in Aliatypus and Aptostichus spidroins (fig. 2). An motifs are hypothesized to impart high tensile strength to dragline silk due to their assembly into ß-crystalline sheets aligned in parallel to the fiber (Simmons et al. 1996Go; Parkhe et al. 1997Go) and may similarly contribute to the mechanical properties of mygalomorph silks. As previously noted from Euagrus, the mygalomorph spidroins contain homopolymeric runs of serine (Sn) and threonine (Tn), in common with the araneomorph egg case spidroin TuSp1 (Garb and Hayashi 2005Go; Hu et al. 2005Go; Tian and Lewis 2005Go, 2006Go; Zhao et al. 2005Go) and spidroins of the haplogyne spider Plectreurys (Gatesy et al. 2001Go). Polyserine (Sn), while also found in the araneomorph prey-wrapping silk protein AcSp1 (Hayashi et al. 2004Go), is virtually absent in all other araneomorph silks characterized to date. Despite their shared An, Sn, and Tn motifs, mygalomorph ensembles could not be easily aligned across spidroins due to high length and sequence variability.

Mygalomorph spidroin amino acid compositions (predicted from cDNA translations) indicate that alanine and serine are by far the most abundant residues. Alanine and serine account for 50% or more of each spidroin, excepting those from Aptostichus, which are comparatively deficient in alanine. Although serine rich, mygalomorph spidroins have relatively little glycine (3.7–10%), a residue that constitutes 30–40% of MaSp1 and MaSp2 (fig. 3a). Within and across species, mygalomorph spidroins are compositionally similar. By contrast, araneomorphs (e.g., orb-web and cob-web weavers) synthesize multiple, compositionally distinctive spidroins. Of these different araneomorph spidroins, the amino acid makeup of egg case silk protein (TuSp1) is most similar to mygalomorph spidroins (fig. 3a).


Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 3.— (a) Predicted amino acid composition of mygalomorph spidroins in comparison to representative araneomorph spidroins (dragline silk proteins MaSp1 and MaSp2 and egg case silk protein TuSp1 from the black widow Latrodectus hesperus and the aciniform silk protein AcSp1 from Argiope argentata). For each sequence, percent composition of alanine, serine, glycine, and threonine are shown in red, purple, yellow, and green, respectively. (b) Predicted amino acid composition of Euagrus chisoseus fibroin 1 in comparison to composition of Euagrus sp. silk fibers determined by Palmer (1985)Go. Shown are the 7 most abundant amino acids, accounting for ~90% of the total, with colors as in (a) in addition to leucine, valine, and isoleucine shown in pink, blue, and orange, respectively. Percentages for each of these residues are reported inside the corresponding color block.

 
Predicted values of the amino acid composition of E. chisoseus fibroin 1 also closely match those determined by Palmer (1985)Go from silk fibers collected from the web of a Euagrus species (fig. 3b). The tight correspondence between these values suggests E. chisoseus fibroin 1 is the major component of Euagrus silk fibers.

By screening thousands of silk gland cDNAs, we found a single type of spidroin from Aliatypus, 1 from Euagrus, 2 from Aptostichus, and 3 from Bothriocyrtum. However, identical sampling procedures recovered 8 distinct types of spidroins from the derived araneomorph D. spinosa (Garb et al. 2006Go). Because of differential expression and sampling effects, we may not have identified all spidroins synthesized by the examined taxa. Nevertheless, our results suggest that mygalomorphs have a reduced diversity of spidroins relative to araneomorphs. These findings are consistent with the simple silk gland morphologies of mygalomorphs and the homogeneous amino acid composition of their silks compared with those of araneomorphs (fig. 3a).

Intragenic Homogenization of Mygalomorph Spidroins
Mygalomorph spidroins are composed of tandem repeats that are remarkably homogenized within a cDNA sequence (etandem identity scores of 87–100%). The previously reported E. chisoseus fibroin 1 was an ~2-kb partial sequence containing 2 repeat units and therefore provided minimal information regarding the repetitive organization of mygalomorph spidroins (Gatesy et al. 2001Go). The new ~8-kb fragment of E. chisoseus fibroin 1 is impressive in terms of its modular organization (fig. 4). This transcript contains 8 tandem repeats that are 1,026 or 1,032 bp in length. On average, these repeats are 98.5% identical and include 2 repeats (4 and 7 in fig. 4) that are 100% identical over 1,026 bp. When compared with their consensus sequence, Euagrus repeats vary at just 35 sites (24 synonymous and 11 nonsynonymous differences). Repeats in other mygalomorph spidroins show even greater levels of intragenic homogeneity. The Aliatypus cDNA contains 7 repeats of 543 bp that on average are 99% identical (see supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online). These repeats differ at 18 sites (5 synonymous and 13 nonsynonymous differences) from their consensus. Moreover, the first 4 repeats in Aptostichus sp. fibroin 1 (507 bp each) are 100% identical, as are 2 of 3 repeats in Aptostichus sp. fibroin 2. Tandem repeats within the Bothriocyrtum cDNAs were similarly homogenized, having between 89 and 100% identity within sequences.


Figure 4
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 4.— (a) Euagrus chisoseus fibroin 1 is composed of 8 tandem repeats and a nonrepetitive C-terminal domain "C." An ellipsis (...) preceding repeat 1 indicates that the cDNA clone is not complete at the 5' end. (b) Aligned nucleotide sequences of repeats ("Rep" with repeat numbering as in [a]) from E. chisoseus fibroin 1 in interleaved format; the first nucleotide sequence represents the consensus "Con" and above its corresponding amino acid translation. Dots signify matches to the consensus sequence, dashes are alignment gaps, lower case letters indicate synonymous differences and upper case letters indicate nonsynonymous differences. Each repeat is 1,026 or 1,032 bp long, and the first is incomplete.

 
In addition to their highly similar nucleotide sequences, intragenic repeats of mygalomorph spidroins exhibited relatively minor length variation. For instance, the ~1-kb Euagrus repeats contained just three 6 bp indels. These indel positions always corresponded to doublets of GCA, which always followed GCA doublets, a pattern that is suggestive of slip-strand replication error (fig. 4b). Within the Aliatypus sequence, etandem identified short subrepeats of 18 bp (93% average identity) encoding the motif "SASGAA" that was iterated 3 times in the first 7 ensemble repeats but 6 times in the eighth repeat (see supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online). The 3 extra repetitions of this motif in this last repeat could be accounted for by 1 duplication event and 2 point mutations. All Bothriocyrtum sequences also showed minor variation in repeat length, almost always associated with indels of 1–3 codons that represent replicates of preceding codons.

The extreme homogeneity among intragenic repeats found within individual mygalomorph spidroins, coupled with divergence of these repeats across sequences, is suggestive of highly dynamic evolutionary processes. Homogeneity of tandem repeats is consistent with selection for identical repeat units in an ancestrally nonrepetitive sequence. Alternatively, this pattern may result from concerted evolution of ancestrally repetitive sequences, due to unequal crossing over events or through nonreciprocal recombination involving gene conversion (Charlesworth et al. 1994Go; Graur and Li 2000Go). Given the near uniformity of synonymous third codon positions in intragenic repeat alignments (e.g., fig. 4b), selection on ancestrally nonrepetitive sequences is an unlikely explanation because third positions should exhibit greater variation unless constrained by selection for extreme codon bias. Such homogeneity of third codon positions is instead more compatible with a history of intragenic concerted evolution. Moreover, because all mygalomorph spidroins are composed of sequence repeats, the simplest explanation for their shared repetitive architecture is that it was inherited from a repetitive, ancestral sequence.

Concerted evolution has been proposed to explain similar patterns of modular architecture observed in araneomorph spidroins (Hayashi and Lewis 2000Go; Garb and Hayashi 2005Go), where intragenic repeats are homogenized but highly divergent across paralogs. These shared molecular features suggest that intragenic concerted evolution has been operating on the spidroin gene family prior to the divergence of mygalomorphs and araneomorphs (minimally dated to the early Triassic, ~240 MYA; Selden and Gall 1992Go). This further implies that spidroins synthesized by the common ancestor of mygalomorphs and araneomorphs were already composed of highly homogenized tandem repeats. Though convergently derived, insect silk proteins secreted by Lepidoptera, Trichoptera, and Diptera are also highly repetitive (Case and Byers 1983Go; Fedic et al. 2003Go; Yonemura et al. 2006Go), suggesting that this type of molecular organization is a fundamental prerequisite for silk fiber function.

Spidroin Gene Family Evolution
Phylogenetic analyses of the spidroin gene family were conducted using an amino acid alignment of the spidroin nonrepetitive C-terminal domain (122 characters for the 27 sampled sequences). Parsimony searches executed with gaps treated as missing data or considered as additional recoded characters retrieved a single most parsimonious tree (fig. 5). Majority-rule consensus trees resulting from Bayesian analyses of these data, though not identical to the parsimony tree, contained many of the same clades (clades supported by PP ≥ 0.50 shown in fig. 5). There were 51 possible root placements for the single most parsimonious tree. The minimal cost required to reconcile a particular gene tree with the given species tree was 16 duplications and 40 losses. Three of the 51 root placements shared this minimal cost, and these alternative rootings are depicted in figure 5.


Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 5.— Spidroin phylogeny estimated from C-terminal sequences. Phylogram of the single most parsimonious tree (L = 1,060) resulting from 10,000 RTA tree searches of aligned amino acids (122 positions) and recoded gap characters. Numbers above internodes indicate BS support/DI, asterisks indicate nodes with <50% BS support. Numbers below internodes are clade PP values in the post burn-in majority-rule consensus tree from Bayesian analyses. Species abbreviations are as follows: D.s. (Deinopis spinosa), A.t. (Argiope trifasciata), U.d. (Uloborus diversus), L.h. (Latrodectus hesperus), A.ap. (Agelenopsis aperta), D.t. (Dolomedes tenebrosus), N.c. (Nephila clavipes), and P.t. (Plectreurys tristis). Mygalomorph sequences indicated by genus name. Arrows indicate alternative root placements resulting in equal costs (of gene duplications and losses) to that incurred by the depicted root, when reconciled with a species tree for the sampled taxa. Gene duplication events inferred by GeneTree 1.3 (Page 1998Go) indicated by black dots at nodes.

 
Previous spidroin phylogenies were rooted with the mygalomorph sequence Euagrus fibroin 1 because mygalomorphs are sister to araneomorphs (from which all other sequences were known) (Garb and Hayashi 2005Go; Garb et al. 2006Go). However, inclusion of additional mygalomorph spidroins grouped neither araneomorph nor mygalomorph sequences as monophyletic (fig. 5). Instead, the resulting trees united all mygalomorph spidroins, except Aliatypus fibroin 1, in a clade receiving moderate support (BS = 61, DI = 5, PP = 1.0). Aliatypus fibroin 1 was placed in another clade that included the araneomorph aciniform gland silk protein AcSp1 (used in prey wrapping and reproduction) and Plectreurys fibroin 4 (P.t. fibroin 4), a spidroin that is yet to be functionally characterized.

Additional parsimony searches constraining all mygalomorph spidroins to monophyly found most parsimonious trees that were 7 steps longer than the unconstrained tree, a difference that was nonsignificant by both Kishino and Hasegawa (1989)Go and Templeton (1983)Go nonparametric tests. Although we cannot statistically reject monophyly of mygalomorph spidroins, our results suggest the occurrence of spidroin paralogs prior to the divergence of mygalomorph and araneomorph spiders. Proliferation of the spidroin gene family at this early stage would explain certain mygalomorph spidroins being more closely related to those in araneomorphs.

Within the clade of mygalomorph spidroins, relationships among sequences do not simply reflect expectations from species level phylogeny ([Aptostichus, Bothriocyrtum], Euagrus). Specifically, not all sequences from Aptostichus and Bothriocyrtum are most closely related to each other. Aptostichus fibroin 1 appears more closely related to Euagrus fibroin 1, suggesting that mygalomorph spidroin genes undergo birth–death events. The 3 Bothriocyrtum fibroin sequences are grouped together and also share substantial similarity in their repetitive sequences. This relationship may be indicative of lineage specific gene expansion within this species. Alternatively, the similarity of these sequences could be due to intergenic recombination events that would obscure orthology–paralogy relationships.

The large number of spidroin paralogs in some araneomorphs (e.g., 8 in the orbicularian D. spinosa) implicates widespread gene duplication and divergence in the diversification of spider silks. Some spidroin paralogs (e.g., Flag, MiSp1, MaSp1, and MaSp2) are associated with silk glands that are restricted to particular araneomorph lineages, indicating that these genes may have specialized along with the glands in which they are primarily expressed (Hayashi and Lewis 1998Go). In the spidroin gene family, minimally 10 duplication events have occurred in araneomorphs, whereas 4 are estimated within mygalomorphs (duplications computed by GeneTree 1.3, Page 1998Go). The reduced level of gene family expansion in mygalomorphs is consistent with the relative uniformity of their silk glands in morphology and function. By contrast, araneomorphs have experienced a greater diversification of spidroins in parallel with the functional specialization of their spinning apparatus. Even so, there is a wide diversity of mygalomorph spidroins (fig. 2), suggesting the need to further investigate the functional and evolutionary significance of these spider silk sequences.


    Supplementary Material
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Supplementary figures S1 and S2 are available at Molecular Biology and Evolution online (http://www.mbe.oxfordjournals.org/).


    Acknowledgements
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
This work was funded by National Science Foundation grants nos DEB-0236020 and MCB-9806999 and US Army Research Office grant nos DAAD19-02-1-0358 and W911NF-06-1-0455. We thank J. Bond, J. Gatesy, M. Hedin, N. Nguyen, C. Vink, V. Vo, and J. Woods for assistance with spider collections and laboratory work. N. Ayoub, J. Gatesy, M. Hedin, M. McGowen, and J. Starrett provided critical feedback on drafts of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
Adriana Briscoe, Associate Editor


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

    Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. (1997) 25:3389–3402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Ayoub NA, Garb JE, Hedin M, Hayashi CY. Utility of the nuclear protein-coding gene, elongation factor-1 gamma (EF-1{gamma}), for spider systematics, emphasizing family level relationships of tarantulas and their kin (Araneae: mygalomorphae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. (2007) 42:394–409.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Beckwitt R, Arcidiacono S. Sequence conservation in the C-terminal region of spider silk proteins (Spidroin) from Nephila clavipes (Tetragnathidae) and Araneus bicentenarius (Araneidae). J Biol Chem. (1994) 269:6661–6663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Beckwitt R, Arcidiacono S, Stote R. Evolution of repetitive proteins: spider silks from Nephila clavipes (Tetragnathidae) and Araneus bicentenarius (Araneidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. (1998) 28:121–130.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Case ST, Byers MR. Repeated nucleotide sequence arrays in Balbiani ring 1 of Chironomus tentans contain internally nonrepeating and subrepeating elements. J Biol Chem. (1983) 258:7793–7799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature (1994) 371:215–220.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Coddington JA, Giribet G, Harvey MS, Prendini L, Walter DE. Arachnida. In: Assembling the tree of life—Cracraft J, Donoghue M, eds. (2004) New York: Oxford University Press. 296–318.

    Coyle FA. The role of silk in prey capture by nonaraneomorph spiders. In: Spiders: webs, behavior, and evolution—Shear WA, ed. (1986) Palo Alto, (CA): Stanford University Press. 319–363.

    Craig CL. Spiderwebs and silk: tracing evolution from molecules to genes to phenotypes (2003) New York: Oxford University Press.

    Fedic R, Zurovec M, Sehnal F. Correlation between fibroin amino acid sequence and physical silk properties. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:35255–35264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Garb JE, DiMauro T, Vo V, Hayashi CY. Silk genes support the single origin of orb-webs. Science (2006) 312:1762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Garb JE, Hayashi CY. Modular evolution of egg case silk genes across orb-weaving spider superfamilies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2005) 102:11379–11384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Gatesy J, Hayashi C, Motriuk D, Woods J, Lewis R. Extreme diversity, conservation, and convergence of spider silk fibroin sequences. Science (2001) 291:2603–2605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Goloboff PA. A reanalysis of mygalomorph spider families (Araneae). Am Mus Novit. (1993) 3056:1–32.

    Graur D, Li W-H. Fundamentals of molecular evolution (2000) Sunderland, (MA): Sinauer Associates.

    Guerette PA, Ginzinger DG, Weber BH, Gosline JM. Silk properties determined by gland-specific expression of a spider fibroin gene family. Science (1996) 272:112–115.[Abstract]

    Haupt J, Kovoor J. Silk-gland system and silk production in Mesothelae (Araneae). Ann Sci Nat Zool Biol Anim. (1993) 14:35–48.

    Hayashi CY, Blackledge TA, Lewis RV. Molecular and mechanical characterization of aciniform silk: uniformity of iterated sequence modules in a novel member of the spider silk fibroin gene family. Mol Biol Evol. (2004) 21:1950–1959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hayashi CY, Lewis RV. Evidence from flagelliform silk cDNA for the structural basis of elasticity and modular nature of spider silks. J Mol Biol. (1998) 275:773–784.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Hayashi CY, Lewis RV. Molecular architecture and evolution of a modular spider silk protein gene. Science (2000) 287:1477–1479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hedin M, Bond JE. Molecular phylogenetics of the spider infraorder Mygalomorphae using nuclear rRNA genes (18S and 28S): conflict and agreement with the current system of classification. Mol Phylogenet Evol. (2006) 41:454–471.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Heger A, Holm L. Rapid automatic detection and alignment of repeats in protein sequences. Proteins (2000) 41:224–237.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Higgins D, Thompson J, Gibson T, Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. (1994) 22:4673–4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hu X, Lawrence B, Kohler K, Falick AM, Moore AMF, McMullen E, Jones PR, Vierra C. Araneoid egg case silk: a fibroin with novel ensemble repeat units from the black widow spider, Latrodectus hesperus. Biochemistry (2005) 44:10020–10027.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (2001) 17:754–755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kishino H, Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol. (1989) 29:170–179.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Maddison DR, Maddison WP. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution (2000) Sunderland, (MA): Sinauer Associates. Version 4.0.

    Motriuk-Smith D, Smith A, Hayashi CY, Lewis RV. Analysis of the conserved N-terminal domains in major ampullate spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules (2005) 6:3152–3159.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Müller K. SeqState: primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA datasets. Appl Bioinformatics (2005) 4:65–69.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Page RDM. GeneTree: comparing gene and species phylogenies using reconciled trees. Bioinformatics (1998) 14:819–820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Palmer JM. The silk and silk production system of the funnel-web mygalomorph spider Euagrus (Araneae, Dipluridae). J Morphol. (1985) 186:195–207.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Palmer JM, Coyle FA, Harrison FW. Structure and cytochemistry of the silk glands of the mygalomorph spider Antrodiaetus unicolor (Araneae, Antrodiaetidae). J Morphol. (1982) 174:269–274.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Parkhe AD, Seeley SK, Gardner K, Thompson L, Lewis RV. Structural studies of spider silk proteins in the fiber. J Mol Recognit. (1997) 10:1–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Platnick NI. The world spider catalog. Am Mus Nat Hist. (2007) Version 7.5. Available form: http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html.

    Platnick NI, Gertsch WJ. The suborders of spiders: a cladistic analysis (Arachnida, Araneae). Am Mus Novit. (1976) 2607:1–15.

    Raven RJ. The spider infraorder Mygalomorphae (Araneae): cladistics and systematics. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. (1985) 182:1–180.

    Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet. (2000) 16:276–277.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Rising A, Hjälm G, Engström W, Johansson J. N-terminal nonrepetitive domain common to dragline, flagelliform, and cylindriform spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules (2006) 7:3120–3124.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Schulz JW. The origin of the spinning apparatus in spiders. Biol Rev. (1987) 62:89–113.

    Selden PA, Gall JC. A Triassic mygalomorph spider from the northern Vosges, France. Palaeontology (1992) 35:211–235.[Web of Science]

    Shear WA, Palmer JM, Coddington JA, Bonamo PM. A Devonian spinneret: early evidence of spiders and silk use. Science (1989) 246:479–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Simmons AH, Michal CA, Jelinski LW. Molecular orientation and two-component nature of the crystalline fraction of spider dragline silk. Science (1996) 271:84–87.[Abstract]

    Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. Gaps as characters in sequence based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol. (2000) 49:369–381.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Swofford D. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) (2006) Sunderland, (MA): Sinauer Associates. Version 4.

    Tai PL, Hwang GY, Tso IM. Inter-specific sequence conservation and intra-individual sequence variation in a spider silk gene. Int J Biol Macromol. (2004) 34:295–301.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Templeton AR. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution (1983) 37:221–244.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Tian M, Lewis RV. Molecular characterization and evolutionary study of spider tubuliform (eggcase) silk protein. Biochemistry (2005) 44:8006–8012.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Tian M, Lewis RV. Tubuliform silk protein: a protein with unique molecular characteristics and mechanical properties in the spider silk fibroin family. Appl Phys A (2006) 82:265–273.[CrossRef]

    Verstrepen KJ, Jansen A, Lewitter F, Fink GR. Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability. Nat Genet. (2005) 37:986–990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Yonemura N, Sehnal F, Mita K, Tamura T. Protein composition of silk filaments spun under water by caddisfly larvae. Biomacromolecules (2006) 7:3370–3378.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Zhao A, Zhao T, SiMa Y, Zhang Y, Nakagaki K, Miao Y, Shiomi K, Kajiura Z, Nagata Y, Nakagaki M. Unique molecular architecture of egg case silk protein in a spider, Nephila clavata. J Biochem. (2005) 138:593–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Accepted for publication August 17, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/11/2454    most recent
msm179v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garb, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, C. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garb, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, C. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?