Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on November 9, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(3):550-558; doi:10.1093/molbev/msj056
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/3/550    most recent
msj056v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cai, X.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cai, X.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Article

Molecular Evolution of the Ankyrin Gene Family

Xinjiang Cai*,{dagger} and Yanhong Zhang{ddagger}

* Howard Hughes Medical Institute and {dagger} Departments of Cell Biology, Biochemistry, and Neuroscience, Duke University Medical Center and {ddagger} Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center

E-mail: x.cai{at}cellbio.duke.edu.


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Note Added in Proof
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Ankyrins are membrane adaptor molecules that play important roles in coupling integral membrane proteins to the spectrin-based cytoskeleton network. Human mutations of ankyrin genes lead to severe genetic diseases such as fatal cardiac arrhythmias and hereditary spherocytosis. To elucidate the evolutionary history of ankyrins, we have identified novel ankyrin sequences in insect, fish, frog, chicken, dog, and chimpanzee genomes and explored the phylogenetic relationships of the ankyrin gene family. Our data demonstrate that duplication of ankyrin genes occurred at two different stages. The first duplication resulted from an independent evolution event specific in Arthropoda after its divergence from Chordata. Following the separation from Urochordata, expansion of ankyrins in vertebrates involved ancestral genome duplications. We did not find evidence of coordinated arrangements of gene families of ankyrin-associated membrane proteins on paralogous chromosomes. In addition, evolution of the 24 ANK-repeats strikingly correlated with the exon boundary sites of ankyrin genes, which might have occurred before its duplication in vertebrates. Such correlation is speculated to bring functional diversity and complexity. Moreover, based on the phylogenetic analysis of the ANK-repeat domain, we put forward a novel model for the putative primordial ankyrin that contains the fourth six–ANK-repeat subdomain and the spectrin-binding domain. These findings will provide guides for future studies concerning structure, function, evolutionary origins of ankyrins, and possibly other cytoskeletal proteins.

Key Words: cytoskeleton • ankyrin • genome duplication • exon evolution • repeat evolution


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Note Added in Proof
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Dynamic interactions among cytoskeletal filaments and their associated proteins regulate many fundamental processes of eukaryotic cells such as cell motility, maintenance of the structural organization and mechanical function (Pollard 2003Go), and generation of cell polarity (Nelson 2003Go). Ankyrins are a family of ubiquitously expressed membrane adaptor molecules associated with the spectrin-based cytoskeleton network and various membrane proteins (Bennett and Baines 2001Go). Since the initial characterization of ankyrin-R in erythrocytes (Bennett and Stenbuck 1979Go), studies using different model systems have revealed physiological roles of ankyrins in targeting various ion transport proteins such as the voltage-gated Na+ channel (NaV), Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX), Na+/K+ ATPase (NKA), and inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (IP3R), and cell adhesion molecules such as CD44 and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) to specialized membrane domains in striated muscle and the nervous system (Bennett and Baines 2001Go). Targeted disruption of ankyrin-G in the mouse cerebellum leads to the coordinate loss of NaV1.6 and L1CAM molecules at the axon initial segments (Jenkins and Bennett 2001Go). Mice deficient in ankyrin-B display the phenotype of a fatal cardiac arrhythmia, resulting from reduced expression level and abnormal targeting of NKA, NCX, and IP3R (Mohler et al. 2003Go). Ankyrins are also required for establishing lateral membrane biogenesis in polarized epithelial cells (Kizhatil and Bennett 2004Go). In addition to their conventional role as a scaffold protein, more recent studies have suggested that ankyrin molecules might be involved in sorting and trafficking of membrane proteins before targeting to the plasma membrane (Lopez et al. 2004Go; Mohler et al. 2004Go).

The ankyrin gene family of mammals contains three members—ANK1 (gene product ankyrin-R) (Lux, John, and Bennett 1990Go), ANK2 (gene product ankyrin-B) (Otto et al. 1991Go), and ANK3 (gene product ankyrin-G) (Kordeli, Lambert, and Bennett 1995Go). Canonical ankyrins comprise three highly conserved domains—an N-terminal membrane-binding domain, a central spectrin-binding domain (SBD), and a death domain. In contrast, the C-terminal domains of ankyrins are very divergent (Bennett and Baines 2001Go). The membrane-binding domain is composed of 24 copies of a 33-residue repeat known as the ANK-repeat. The 24 repeats are divided into four independently folded subdomains, each containing six repeats (Michaely and Bennett 1993Go). Atomic structures of a 12–ANK-repeat stack from human ankyrin-R (Michaely et al. 2002Go) have revealed that individual ANK-repeats are assembled into the characteristic "L"-shaped structure consisting of two pairs of short antiparallel {alpha}-helices followed by a long loop and an intervening ß-hairpin motif that are arranged perpendicular to the helices.

SBD binds to ß-spectrin with high affinity (Davis and Bennett 1984Go). The first 11-residue segment of the SBD of ankyrin-R seems to fold back and bind to ANK-repeat 20–24 through a peptide-in-groove interaction in an extended conformation (Michaely et al. 2002Go). Interaction between ankyrin-R and spectrin couples actin cytoskeleton to the plasma membrane of erythrocytes. Recently, ankyrin-B has been shown to be required for the normal localization of ß2-spectrin to an intracellular compartment in neonatal cardiomyocytes (Mohler, Yoon, and Bennett 2004Go). In addition, studies using chimeras between ankyrin-G and ankyrin-B suggests that the SBD of ankyrin-G, but not ankyrin-B, might participate in protein pathways responsible for the lateral membrane biogenesis in human bronchial epithelial cells (Kizhatil and Bennett 2004Go).

Death domains are found in proteins such as Fas and tumor necrosis factor receptors involved in signal transduction that leads to apoptosis (Hofmann and Tschopp 1995Go). The role of the ankyrin death domain remains to be determined. In kidney, the death domain of ankyrin-G has been shown to interact with the death domain of Fas receptors and promote Fas-induced apoptosis in renal epithelia cells (Del Rio et al. 2004Go). The C-terminal regulatory domain is highly variable among ankyrin family members, and therefore likely accounts for distinct physiological functions of different ankyrin molecules. Indeed, replacement of the C-terminal domain of ankyrin-B with that of ankyrin-G completely abolishes the function of ankyrin-B in targeting IP3 and ryanodine receptors in neonatal cardiomyocytes (Mohler, Gramolini, and Bennett 2002Go).

Recent reports on the phylogeny of {alpha}-actinins of the spectrin superfamily have extended our understanding of their evolutionary origins (Dixson, Forstner, and Garcia 2003Go; Virel and Backman 2004Go). Mutations in the Caenorhabditis elegans ankyrin gene, unc-44, affect axonal guidance and result in uncoordinated movement (Otsuka et al. 1995Go), indicating the importance of ankyrins in animal development. However, a comprehensive analysis on the evolutionary relationship of the ankyrin family members has been hindered by the limited number of ankyrin sequences in the public database. As of December 2004, an examination of the 6,207 ANK-repeat protein sequences (IPR002110) at the InterPro protein family database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/) revealed 31 ankyrin sequences and then pared down to only seven nonredundant ankyrin sequences.

Here, we have undertaken the first comprehensive and rigorous phylogenetic analysis of ankyrin sequences identified by extensive screenings of currently available whole-genome sequences. We have also examined the chromosomal distribution of ankyrin genes to explore the potential mechanisms leading to their expansion in vertebrates. Moreover, we have for the first time systematically examined the evolution of ankyrin repeats in terms of exon structure and repeat subdomains.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Note Added in Proof
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Sequence Database Searches and Multiple Sequence Alignments
BlastP (Altschul et al. 1997Go) searches were performed to screen the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and UniProt/SwissProt protein databases using C. elegans ankyrin (SwissProt accession number Q17486), Homo sapiens ankyrin-B (SwissProt accession number Q01484), or their truncated sequences containing the last six ANK-repeats and the SBD. TBlastN (Altschul et al. 1997Go) searches for new ankyrin sequences were conducted using available genome sequences at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/), the Ensembl Genome Browser (http://www.ensembl.org/Multi/blastview), and Ciona intestinalis genome v1.0 (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/ciona4/ciona4.home.html) (Dehal et al. 2002Go). Identified DNA segments and their neighboring regions of genomic sequences were used to search coding exons or open reading frames using the GENSCAN program (Burge and Karlin 1997Go) (http://genes.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html) or GENE FINDING programs at the Softberry Web site (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=index&group=programs&subgroup=gfind).

Protein sequence alignments were performed using ClustalX (version 1.83) (Jeanmougin et al. 1998Go) and were subsequently manually edited to improve alignments in Genedoc (K. Nicholas, H. Nicholas, and Deerfield 1997Go) as previously described (Cai and Lytton 2004Go). Partial and duplicated sequences as well as alternatively spliced isoforms were excluded to confirm that only one ankyrin gene product of each type from each species was analyzed further for phylogenetic analysis.

Phylogenetic Analysis
Multiple alignment files adjusted by Genedoc were exported to files in PHYLIP format. All sequences were initially subject to the chi-square analysis for homogeneity of amino acid composition implemented in Tree-Puzzle (version 5.2) (Schmidt et al. 2002Go). Sequences that failed in the chi-square test or contained more than 15% gaps in the refined alignments were extruded. Protein maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using PROML within the PHYLIP package (version 3.64) (Felsenstein 1996Go), with the Jones-Taylor-Thornton amino acid substitution matrix, a mixed four-category discrete-gamma model of among-site rate variation plus invariable sites, and global arrangements and randomized input order of sequences (10 jumbles). The {alpha} parameter and the fraction of invariable sites were estimated using Tree-Puzzle. Protein ML-distance bootstrap values by analysis of 100 resampled data sets obtained using SEQBOOT (PHYLIP package) were calculated using PUZZLEBOOT (http://www.tree-puzzle.de) with the same settings as those employed for PROML.

Phylogenetic analyses with bootstrap values were also performed with the maximum parsimony (MP) method and the neighbor-joining (NJ) analysis as previously described (Cai and Lytton 2004Go), using PROTPARS, and PROTDIST and NEIGHBOR programs in the PHYLIP package (Felsenstein 1996Go), respectively. The Jones-Taylor-Thornton amino acid substitution matrix and a rate heterogeneity model with the gamma-distributed rates over four categories were used in the PROTDIST program. Weighted NJ analysis was performed with WEIGHBOR (Perriere and Gouy 1996Go), using the distance matrix calculated by PROTDIST or Tree-Puzzle. The TREEVIEW program (version 1.6.6) (Page 1996Go) and NJPLOT (Perriere and Gouy 1996Go) were used to display the phylogenetic trees.

Mapping the Genomic Locations of Members of Ankyrin and Selected Gene Families
Extensive text-based searches for the chromosomal locations of ankyrin and selected gene families in the genomes of C. elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Gallus gallus, and H. sapiens were performed at the NCBI Map Viewer Web site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview/). Also, each genome sequence was examined with TBlastN searches using at least one gene homolog from each gene family to reveal additional chromosomal loci of members of these gene families. The chromosomal locations were described with the genetic linkage map (centimorgans), the sequence map (kilobases), or the cytogenetic map (banding pattern).


    Results and Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Note Added in Proof
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
To date, ankyrin genes have been cloned and characterized in C. elegans (Otsuka et al. 1995Go), D. melanogaster (Dubreuil and Yu 1994Go; Bouley et al. 2000Go), and H. sapiens (Lux, John, and Bennett 1990Go; Otto et al. 1991Go; Kordeli, Lambert, and Bennett 1995Go). Here, we were able to identify 39 nonredundant ankyrin sequences from 18 species analyzed in our study, including 15 mammalian ankyrin sequences and 24 nonmammalian ankyrin sequences. Gene names, species names, identifiers, and database origins are listed in table 1. Extensive searches of available genome sequences led to identification of novel ankyrin sequences from species in which no ankyrin sequences have been previously reported, such as marine invertebrate ascidian C. intestinalis and five nonmammalian vertebrates Danio rerio, Fugu rubripes, Tetraodon nigroviridis, Xenopus tropicalis, and G. gallus. The addition of these sequences in Urochordata and lower vertebrates is critical to explore the evolutionary history of the ankyrin family. In honeybee Apis mellifera and some fish species, additional ankyrin genes were also identified on other chromosomes or scaffolds (e.g., A. mellifera, GI 48104470). But due to incomplete genome sequencing, protein sequences encoded by these DNA fragments were too short to be included in subsequent analyses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 List of Ankyrin Proteins Used for Analyses

 
Duplication Events of Ankyrin Genes Occurred at Two Different Stages
Multiple sequence alignments of 39 ankyrin sequences were manually edited, and sequences of the highly conserved regions, containing primarily the membrane-binding domain and the SBD, were used for further analysis. Four sequences (see table 1) were extruded after the initial analysis with Tree-Puzzle. Repeated motifs in many proteins undergo various homogenization events (Zimmer et al. 1980Go), which sometimes may mask the evolutionary history normally contained in molecular sequences. Nevertheless, in this study, sequences data used in our phylogenetic analysis included both ANK-repeat domain and nonrepetitive SBD. Furthermore, results from ML, MP, and NJ approaches were compared to infer the congruent phylogeny. The unrooted phylogeny trees of the ankyrin family are shown in figure 1 and figures S1 and S2 (Supplementary Material online). Discrepancies at the terminal (mammal) branches of ankyrin-B between figure 1 and figures S1 and S2 (Supplementary Material online) were observed, implying the difficulties of analyzing repetitive sequences and/or highly homologous sequences of mammal ankyrin-B proteins that might have limited the informative sites for analyses within a specific clade (also see Figs. S3–S5, Supplementary Material online). However, those different phylogenetic approaches generated identical overall tree topologies and consistent locations of major ankyrin clades, inferring the reliable evolutionary analysis.


Figure 1
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.— The composite tree of the ankyrin family. The unrooted phylogenetic tree, constructed by using Tree-Puzzle and PUZZLEBOOT, shows the evolutionary history of ankyrins from nematodes to mammals. Bootstrap values are shown at the nodes. Trees obtained by NJ (Fig. S1) and MP (Fig. S2) analyses are available in Supplementary Material online.

 
The nematode genomes (C. elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae) contain single copies of ankyrin gene. The presence of two ankyrin members in the insect genomes suggested an initial gene duplication event occurred after the divergence into arthropoda. Clearly, the vertebrate ankyrins are grouped into three major branches, as previously defined in human (Bennett and Baines 2001Go). Interestingly, the two ankyrins in insect genomes do not correlate with orthologs of three vertebrate ankyrins, suggesting that the initial divergence and duplication of ankyrin might be separated from the chordate ankyrin evolution and reflect an independent arthropoda-specific late event. This hypothesis is further supported by the finding that the invertebrate urochordate C. intestinalis appears to have only a single ankyrin gene (see below).

We believe that C. intestinalis contains only one copy of ankyrin gene based on the following three reasons. Firstly, C. intestinalis appears to possess single copies of many vertebrate gene families such as Nkx2 and bHLH Hand transcription factor families (Dehal et al. 2002Go; Leveugle et al. 2004Go). It has been proposed that large-scale gene duplications occurred after the vertebrates diverged from the cephalochordates and urochordates (Holland et al. 1994Go). Secondly, no other homologous ankyrin sequences could be found in the current version of C. intestinalis genome sequence. Thirdly, it is unlikely that C. intestinalis might have lost two copies of ankyrin subsequently after the divergence. The C. intestinalis ankyrin (CinANK) does not branch with the three vertebrate ankyrin groups (fig. 1 and Figs. S1 and S2 [Supplementary Material online]). In contrast, if only one copy of ankyrin-B, R, or G from one of the vertebrate genomes is used in the analysis, this single copy is nevertheless grouped with one of the three vertebrate branches. The single CinANK gene subsequently evolved into three ankyrin genes, likely before the early Euteleostomi lineage, as the pufferfish T. nigroviridis contains all three vertebrate ankyrins.

Evolution of Vertebrate Ankyrins Might Involve Ancestral Genome Duplications
The phylogeny of vertebrate ankyrins was further analyzed with one outgroup chosen from invertebrates, CelANK (Figs. S3–S5, Supplementary Material online). Comparison of the overall tree topologies clearly indicates that the clades of ankyrin-G and ankyrin-B are more closely related to each other compared with the ankyrin-R clade. It seems that ankyrin-B and G were derived from an ancestral ankyrin that diverged from ankyrin-R before the duplication event.

In 1970, Susumo Ohno first proposed that vertebrate genomes evolved through rounds of large-scale duplications (Ohno 1970Go), possibly in the form of polyploidization. The area of ancient genome duplication in vertebrate lineage has been intensively investigated (Spring 2002Go; Wolfe and Li 2003Go). Recent phylogenetic analyses and comparative genome analyses provide strong evidence of large segmental (en bloc) duplication of vertebrate genomes (Pebusque et al. 1998Go; Abi-Rached et al. 2002Go; McLysaght, Hokamp, and Wolfe 2002Go; Robinson-Rechavi, Boussau, and Laudet 2004Go)—but also see references suggesting coordinated arrangements of related gene families known to interact (Martin 2001Go; Pennisi 2001Go). Here, we are interested in investigating whether expansion of the vertebrate ankyrin family resulted from genome duplications. If the vertebrate ankyrin evolution was derived from genome duplications, other gene families located in the same chromosome regions should also be involved.

The single ankyrin gene in C. elegans is located on chromosome IV (cM 2.91). Members of several other gene families also placed on chromosome IV were chosen for genomic analysis, including UNC-5, choline acetyltransferase (CAT), vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT), IP3R, and L1CAM (Table S1, Supplementary Material online). UNC-5 is a transmembrane protein initially found to be involved in axon guidance in C. elegans (Leung-Hagesteijn et al. 1992Go; Hamelin et al. 1993Go). Recent studies demonstrate that members of UNC-5 family are netrin receptors mediating repulsion of axon migration (Wadsworth 2002Go). CAT and VMAT have been used in a previous study (Pebusque et al. 1998Go). IP3R and L1CAM are integral membrane proteins known to interact with the ankyrin cytoskeleton network (Chen, Ong, and Bennett 2001Go; Mohler, Gramolini, and Bennett 2002Go).

We combined Map Viewer searches using keyword queries and extensive TBlastN searches of genomes from C. elegans, D. melanogaster, G. gallus, and H. sapiens at the NCBI Web site. The genomic locations of five gene families in four species are shown in Table S1 (Supplementary Material online). In C. elegans, each gene family contains a single copy of the gene on chromosome IV. In D. melanogaster, almost all genes remain to be a single copy except ankyrin. As discussed above, in insects, a recent and independent gene duplication event of ankyrin likely occurred. Genomic locations of these genes in C. intestinalis remain unknown because its genomic assembling has not been finished.

In vertebrates, ankyrin, VMAT, and IP3R split into three members, and L1CAM and UNC-5 evolved to have four genes (Table S1 [Supplementary Material online] and fig. 2). It is predicted that the first round of genome duplication occurred just after the divergence of Cephalochordata and Craniata ancestors. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that urochordate C. intestinalis has a nonduplicated genome (Leveugle et al. 2004Go). Ankyrin, UNC-5, and VMAT genes are all present on chromosome 10 and chromosome 8, along with the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and adrenergic receptor (ADR) genes (Pebusque et al. 1998Go) and genes of several other families—dickkopf, EIF4E-binding protein and calcineurin catalytic unit (Table S1, Supplementary Material online). Therefore, it seems likely that at least a part of chromosomes 10 and 8 might be derived together from the first round of duplication. Duplication of VMAT-2 (10q11.2) and VMAT-3 (10q24.3-25.1) might have evolved through a centromere-proximal duplication and an intrachromosomal rearrangement mechanism on chromosome 10q11 (Crosier et al. 2002Go). Phylogenetic analyses have revealed that closer evolutionary relationships between HsaANK-G (chr10) and HsaANK-B (chr4) compared with HsaANK-R (chr8) (described above), UNC-5B (chr10) and UNC-5C (chr4) compared with UNC-5D (chr8) and UNC-5A (chr5) (data not shown), HsaFGFR-2 (chr10) and HsaFGFR-3 (chr4) compared with HsaFGFR-1 (chr8) and HsaFGFR-4 (chr5) (Coulier et al. 1997Go), and ADRA2A (chr10) and ADRA2C (chr4) compared with ADRA1A (also known as ADRA1C) (chr8) and ADRA1B (chr5) (Ruuskanen et al. 2004Go). Phylogeny of dickkopf, EIF4EBP, and PPP3C genes also indicates the same pattern (data not shown). These data suggest that at least a large segment of chromosomes 4 and 5 were likely duplicated from chromosomes 10 and 8 in the second round, respectively (fig. 2). It seems that a loss of related genes might have occurred after the second round of duplication, that is, no ankyrin gene could be found on chromosome 5, possibly due to functional redundancy. Analysis of yeast (Wolfe and Shields 1997Go) and plant genomes (Kashkush, Feldman, and Levy 2002Go) has suggested considerable gene loss following the duplication of the whole genome.


Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.— A putative schematic illustration of the evolution of ankyrin, UNC-5, CAT, and VMAT genes. The relative chromosomal locations of ankyrin, UNC-5, CAT, and VMAT genes are highlighted with gray cylinders. The genomic assembly of Ciona intestinalis is unknown (marked with "?"). Genomic sequences containing GgaANK-R and GgaVMAT1 have not been placed in the Gallus gallus chromosome assembly (marked with "Un?"). Given that three copies of ankyrins are present in fish species, expansion of the ankyrin gene family is predicted to occur at very early Euteleostomi lineage. Relative genomic locations of ADR and FGFR genes shown on Homo sapiens chromosomes are also highlighted with gray cylinders.

 
In contrast to the hypothesis of maintenance of functionally coupled gene families on paralogous chromosomes (Martin 2001Go; Pennisi 2001Go), IP3R and L1CAM genes, which were originally located on chromosome IV along with ankyrin, UNC-5, CAT, and VMAT in C. elegans, were separated in vertebrate genomes (Table S1 [Supplementary Material online] and fig. 2). This separation seems to have occurred before genome duplications in vertebrates. In addition, neither spectrin nor other integral membrane proteins currently known to physiologically associate with ankyrins, such as NCX, ryanodine receptors, and anion exchangers, were found to coevolve through coordinated chromosome locations with ankyrin (data not shown). Interestingly, although chromosomal locations of L1CAM and IP3R genes are coordinated in the G. gallus genome, only HsaCHL1 in the L1CAM gene family maintains its coordinated genomic location with HsaIP3R genes (Table S1, Supplementary Material online). HsaNrCAM and HsaNfasc genes seem to have been rearranged to chromosomes different from their IP3R counterparts in the H. sapiens genome (also in the Mus musculus genome; data not shown). Taken together, possible loss of gene paralogs during vertebrate evolution, especially after the second round of duplications, and lineage-specific chromosomal rearrangements of gene paralogs in the recent evolution history might contribute to the complexity of the genome duplication hypothesis in vertebrates (Spring 2002Go; Wolfe and Li 2003Go).

Our observation suggests that molecular evolution of the ankyrin family likely involved ancestral segmental genome duplications in vertebrates. Due to the limited number of gene families analyzed in this study based on our primary research interests, it should be noted that the conclusion here might not necessarily imply large-scale genome duplications in vertebrates. Caenorhabditis elegans and D. melanogaster are highly derived organisms even within their own phyla, which makes it difficult to detect the corresponding chromosome regions in invertebrates that could give rise to many other paralogous domains in vertebrates suggesting genome duplication (Spring 2002Go). The ongoing genome assembly project of C. intestinalis as a primitive member of Chordata may provide promising opportunities to study the genome duplication hypothesis. Large-scale genome duplications causing a severe imbalance in gene product and resulting in rapid gene losses likely contributed to the early stage of vertebrate evolution, whereas segmental (small scale) duplications occurred constantly in vertebrate evolution (X. Gu, Wang, and J. Gu 2002Go). Nevertheless, our observation is consistent with previous studies of segmental genome duplication of vertebrate genomes (Pebusque et al. 1998Go; Abi-Rached et al. 2002Go; McLysaght, Hokamp, and Wolfe 2002Go; Robinson-Rechavi, Boussau, and Laudet 2004Go).

Evolution of the 24 ANK-Repeats Correlated with the Exon Boundary Sites of Ankyrin Genes
A striking feature of all HsaANK genes is their unique organization of the coding exons for the 24 ANK-repeats (fig. 3). With four exceptions that one exon encodes two ANK-repeats (repeats 5–6, 10–11, 15–16, and 19–20), the exon boundaries of HsaANK within the ANK-repeat region are corresponding to exactly a single ANK-repeat for each exon (99 nt/33 amino acids each). In contrast, CelANK and DmeANK contain three large coding exons that encode more than 20 ANK-repeats. The genomic structure of CinANK shows similar features with HsaANK—18 individual ANK-repeats are encoded by single exons, while all fish DreANK genes exhibit the same exon structure as HsaANK (fig. 3). These data suggest that a common primitive ancestral ankyrin might have evolved to contain the modern exon structure after the divergence from Urochordata but before the expansion in vertebrates. Alternatively, although less likely, the modern exon structure might have been adapted from convergence evolution after the duplication in vertebrates.


Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.— Exon structure of ankyrin genes within the ANK-repeat region. The exon boundary sites of CelANK, DmeANK-2, CinANK, DreANK, and HsaANK within the 24 ANK-repeat region are constructed from intron-exon data at NCBI or by scanning the genomic sequences. All exons encoding two or more ANK-repeats are indicated by double-headed arrows. Exons encoding individual ANK-repeats and the N-termini (N-ter) (except for CelANK) are indicated by dash lines.

 
The canonical ANK-repeat is composed of 33 amino acids with a characteristic L-shaped structure. Alternative splicing sites in Chordates could potentially fall within an ANK-repeat. But in order to maintain the reading frame, the activity and the rigid structure of the ANK-repeat, these sites must be consistent in the exact same location in each repeat involved, which could generate selective pressure (functional and structural constraints) on the evolution of the ankyrin exon-intron organization. The exact exon–ANK-repeat correlation might have occurred as the most economic and convenient evolution pattern under such pressure. The unique exon structures of the ANK-repeat region could then promote the diversity of ankyrin isoforms by different combinations of individual ANK-repeats as a result of alternative splicing. Such a mechanism could increase the specificity of ankyrins in mediating sorting and targeting of various membrane transporters by generating novel biological functions and/or complex cell and tissue-specific expression pattern. This idea is currently being explored in our laboratory.

Consistent with this hypothesis is the observation that ankyrin-associated integral membrane proteins such as NCX also undergo considerable tissue-specific alternative splicing in the large cytoplasmic loops speculated to bind ankyrin (Li et al. 1993Go; Quednau, Nicoll, and Philipson 1997Go). Interestingly, these alternative splice sites of NCX have been also shown to be more evident in vertebrates than in invertebrates (Marshall et al. 2005Go). The evolution of complex physiology of vertebrates might require more precise regulation of targeting of diverse membrane proteins including different splice isoforms of the same gene to various specialized membrane domains of the cell. Characterization of the putative ankyrin isoforms with different combination of ankyrin repeats would provide novel insights into novel cellular pathways essential for vertebrate physiology.

Attempt to Identify the Evolutionary Origin of Ankyrins
Previous studies of the spectrin phylogeny suggested that once the number of spectrin repeats became constant, repeat sequences seemed to have evolved independently (Thomas et al. 1997Go), and therefore, sequences from these fixed repeats might be reliable in building accurate phylogeny trees. The full-length ankyrins all contain exactly the same copies (24) of ANK-repeats in each molecule. The 24 ANK-repeats of ankyrins form four functionally important six repeat subdomains as basic protein interaction sites (Michaely and Bennett 1993Go). Phylogenetic analysis of these six–ANK-repeat sequences from four representative species was conducted with a prokaryotic six–ANK-repeat sequence as an outgroup (SwissProt Q8Q0U0) (fig. 4 and Figs. S6 and S7 [Supplementary Material online]). Although the position of its clade in the trees was consistent in different phylogenetic analyses, the first six-repeat sequences at the N-terminus of the ANK-repeat domain did not generate reliable grouping pattern within its own clade. This is possibly due to lower conservation of the external protein repeats (Bork 1993Go), which might have masked the evolutionary history between them. In all these trees, however, subdomain 4 containing last six repeats (repeats 19–24) shows consistent distant evolutionary relationship with other three subdomains. Recent crystal structure of repeats 13–24 of H. sapiens ankyrin-R suggests that the last six-repeat subdomain might play a role in fixing the orientation of the SBD (Michaely et al. 2002Go). Because the spectrin-binding function is an essential component of ankyrins, we propose a novel model for the primordial ankyrin molecule predating the nematode CelANK—the putative primordial ankyrin contains primarily the last six–ANK-repeat subdomain and the SBD.


Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.— ML phylogenetic tree of the six–ANK-repeat subdomains from selected species. The tree is obtained by PROML using a prokaryotic six–ANK-repeat sequence (SwissProt Q8Q0U0) as an outgroup. Protein ML-distance bootstrap values ≥ 50 for bipartitions are indicated at the relevant nodes. Trees obtained by NJ (Fig. S6) and MP (Fig. S7) analyses are available in Supplementary Material online. 6, sequences from ANK-repeat 1 to 6; 12, sequences from ANK-repeat 7 to 12; 18, sequences from ANK-repeat 13 to 18; and 24, sequences from ANK-repeat 19 to 24.

 
Subsequently, TBlastN searches were performed to screen the NCBI genome databases of bacteria, archaea, and unicellular eukaryotes using truncated sequences of CelANK and HsaANK-B containing the last six ANK-repeats and the SBD, as well as their full-length sequences. Although our searches confirmed the abundance of ANK-repeat containing sequences in the genome databases (Bork 1993Go; Mosavi et al. 2004Go), no significant sequence similarities with the SBD could be identified in these sequences. The identification of bacterial homologs of eukaryotic cytoskeletal proteins has advanced our understanding of bacterial cell biology (Gitai 2005Go). To date, however, there is no evidence from genomic database searches to support the presence of ankyrins outside the metazoan phyla. Possibly, ankyrin and spectrin proteins evolved during the transition to the metazoans to form spatially organized cellular domains and to facilitate cell-cell and intracellular communications (Bennett and Baines 2001Go). But it should be pointed out that, as demonstrated in structural and functional comparison between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cytoskeletal proteins (Amos, van den Ent, and Lowe 2004Go), the SBD sequence of the primordial ankyrin molecule might be too divergent to allow identification by the current database search model based on pairwise sequence comparisons. This problem could potentially be resolved by combining sequence alignments with comparisons of superposed three-dimensional structure of functional domains (Stevens 2005Go), which requires determination of the structure of the SBD in the future.

In summary, this work has presented a comprehensive bioinformatics study of the ankyrin gene family, integrating genomic and phylogenetic analyses. Ankyrin genes were duplicated separately in arthropod and vertebrate lineages. Expansion of the vertebrate ankyrins appears to have resulted from segmental genome duplications. A novel model for the putative ankyrin ancestor has been proposed. These findings build a foundation for future studies concerning structural, functional, and evolutionary analyses of ankyrins and possibly other cytoskeletal proteins.


    Note Added in Proof
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Note Added in Proof
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
While this manuscript was under review, Hopitzan, Baines, and Kordeli (2005)Go reported the gain-of-function evolution of an obscurin/titin-binding–related domain in vertebrate ankyrins that are known to interact with two myofibrillar proteins, obscurin, and titin (Hopitzan et al. 2005Go). They described a very similar evolution pattern of ankyrins (see their fig. 4) based on the phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences of the ZU-5 domain, which was consistent with our evolutionary analyses of ankyrins presented in this manuscript.


    Supplementary Material
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Note Added in Proof
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Figures S1–S7 and Table S1 at are available at Molecular Biology and Evolution online (http://www.mbe.oxfordjournals.org/).


    Acknowledgements
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Note Added in Proof
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
X.C. thanks Vann Bennett (in whose laboratory this work was done) for his support and helpful discussions and Andrew Ravanelli for critical reading of this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Johnson and Johnson to Vann Bennett.


    Footnotes
 
Claudia Schmidt-Dannert, Associate Editor


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Note Added in Proof
 Supplementary Material
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

    Abi-Rached, L., A. Gilles, T. Shiina, P. Pontarotti, and H. Inoko. 2002. Evidence of en bloc duplication in vertebrate genomes. Nat. Genet. 31:100–105.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389–3402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Amos, L. A., F. van den Ent, and J. Lowe. 2004. Structural/functional homology between the bacterial and eukaryotic cytoskeletons. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16:24–31.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Bennett, V., and A. J. Baines. 2001. Spectrin and ankyrin-based pathways: metazoan inventions for integrating cells into tissues. Physiol. Rev. 81:1353–1392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Bennett, V., and P. J. Stenbuck. 1979. The membrane attachment protein for spectrin is associated with band 3 in human erythrocyte membranes. Nature 280:468–473.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Bork, P. 1993. Hundreds of ankyrin-like repeats in functionally diverse proteins: mobile modules that cross phyla horizontally? Proteins 17:363–374.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Bouley, M., M. Z. Tian, K. Paisley, Y. C. Shen, J. D. Malhotra, and M. Hortsch. 2000. The L1-type cell adhesion molecule neuroglian influences the stability of neural ankyrin in the Drosophila embryo but not its axonal localization. J. Neurosci. 20:4515–4523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Burge, C., and S. Karlin. 1997. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 268:78–94.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Cai, X., and J. Lytton. 2004. The cation/Ca2+ exchanger superfamily: phylogenetic analysis and structural implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1692–1703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Chen, L., B. Ong, and V. Bennett. 2001. LAD-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans L1CAM homologue, participates in embryonic and gonadal morphogenesis and is a substrate for fibroblast growth factor receptor pathway-dependent phosphotyrosine-based signaling. J. Cell Biol. 154:841–855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Coulier, F., P. Pontarotti, R. Roubin, H. Hartung, M. Goldfarb, and D. Birnbaum. 1997. Of worms and men: an evolutionary perspective on the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and FGF receptor families. J. Mol. Evol. 44:43–56.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Crosier, M., L. Viggiano, J. Guy et al. 2002. Human paralogs of KIAA0187 were created through independent pericentromeric-directed and chromosome-specific duplication mechanisms. Genome Res. 12:67–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Davis, J. Q., and V. Bennett. 1984. Brain ankyrin. A membrane-associated protein with binding sites for spectrin, tubulin, and the cytoplasmic domain of the erythrocyte anion channel. J. Biol. Chem. 259:13550–13559.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Dehal, P., Y. Satou, R. K. Campbell et al. 2002. The draft genome of Ciona intestinalis: insights into chordate and vertebrate origins. Science 298:2157–2167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Del Rio, M., A. Imam, M. DeLeon, G. Gomez, J. Mishra, Q. Ma, S. Parikh, and P. Devarajan. 2004. The death domain of kidney ankyrin interacts with Fas and promotes Fas-mediated cell death in renal epithelia. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15:41–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Dixson, J. D., M. J. Forstner, and D. M. Garcia. 2003. The alpha-actinin gene family: a revised classification. J. Mol. Evol. 56:1–10.[ISI][Medline]

    Dubreuil, R. R., and J. Yu. 1994. Ankyrin and beta-spectrin accumulate independently of alpha-spectrin in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10285–10289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Felsenstein, J. 1996. Inferring phylogenies from protein sequences by parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. Methods Enzymol. 266:418–427.[ISI][Medline]

    Gitai, Z. 2005. The new bacterial cell biology: moving parts and subcellular architecture. Cell 120:577–586.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Gu, X., Y. Wang, and J. Gu. 2002. Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution. Nat. Genet. 31:205–209.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Hamelin, M., Y. Zhou, M. W. Su, I. M. Scott, and J. G. Culotti. 1993. Expression of the UNC-5 guidance receptor in the touch neurons of C. elegans steers their axons dorsally. Nature 364:327–330.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Hofmann, K., and J. Tschopp. 1995. The death domain motif found in Fas (Apo-1) and TNF receptor is present in proteins involved in apoptosis and axonal guidance. FEBS Lett. 371:321–323.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Holland, P. W., J. Garcia-Fernandez, N. A. Williams, and A. Sidow. 1994. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Dev. Suppl. :125–133.

    Hopitzan, A. A., A. J. Baines, and E. Kordeli. 2006. Molecular evolution of ankyrin: gain of function in vertebrates by acquisition of an obscurin/titin-binding-related domain (OTBD). Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:46–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hopitzan, A. A., A. J. Baines, M. A. Ludosky, M. Recouvreur, and E. Kordeli. 2005. Ankyrin-G in skeletal muscle: tissue-specific alternative splicing contributes to the complexity of the sarcolemmal cytoskeleton. Exp. Cell Res. 309:86–98.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Jeanmougin, F., J. D. Thompson, M. Gouy, D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1998. Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:403–405.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Jenkins, S. M., and V. Bennett. 2001. Ankyrin-G coordinates assembly of the spectrin-based membrane skeleton, voltage-gated sodium channels, and L1 CAMs at Purkinje neuron initial segments. J. Cell Biol. 155:739–746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kashkush, K., M. Feldman, and A. A. Levy. 2002. Gene loss, silencing and activation in a newly synthesized wheat allotetraploid. Genetics 160:1651–1659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kizhatil, K., and V. Bennett. 2004. Lateral membrane biogenesis in human bronchial epithelial cells requires 190-kDa ankyrin-G. J. Biol. Chem. 279:16706–16714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kordeli, E., S. Lambert, and V. Bennett. 1995. AnkyrinG. A new ankyrin gene with neural-specific isoforms localized at the axonal initial segment and node of Ranvier. J. Biol. Chem. 270:2352–2359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Leung-Hagesteijn, C., A. M. Spence, B. D. Stern, Y. Zhou, M. W. Su, E. M. Hedgecock, and J. G. Culotti. 1992. UNC-5, a transmembrane protein with immunoglobulin and thrombospondin type 1 domains, guides cell and pioneer axon migrations in C. elegans. Cell 71:289–299.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Leveugle, M., K. Prat, C. Popovici, D. Birnbaum, and F. Coulier. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of Ciona intestinalis gene superfamilies supports the hypothesis of successive gene expansions. J. Mol. Evol. 58:168–181.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Li, Z. P., E. P. Burke, J. S. Frank, V. Bennett, and K. D. Philipson. 1993. The cardiac Na+-Ca2+ exchanger binds to the cytoskeletal protein ankyrin. J. Biol. Chem. 268:11489–11491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Lopez, C., S. Metral, D. Eladari, S. Drevensek, P. Gane, R. Chambrey, V. Bennett, J. P. Cartron, C. Le Van Kim, and Y. Colin. 2004. The ammonium transporter RhBG: requirement of a tyrosine-based signal and ankyrin-G for basolateral targeting and membrane anchorage in polarized kidney epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 280:8221–8228.

    Lux, S. E., K. M. John, and V. Bennett. 1990. Analysis of cDNA for human erythrocyte ankyrin indicates a repeated structure with homology to tissue-differentiation and cell-cycle control proteins. Nature 344:36–42.[Medline]

    Marshall, C. R., J. A. Fox, S. L. Butland, B. F. Ouellette, F. S. Brinkman, and G. F. Tibbits. 2005. Phylogeny of Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) genes from genomic data identifies new gene duplications and a new family member in fish species. Physiol. Genomics 21:161–173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Martin, A. 2001. Is tetralogy true? Lack of support for the "one-to-four rule". Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:89–93.[Free Full Text]

    McLysaght, A., K. Hokamp, and K. H. Wolfe. 2002. Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat. Genet. 31:200–204.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Michaely, P., and V. Bennett. 1993. The membrane-binding domain of ankyrin contains four independently folded subdomains, each comprised of six ankyrin repeats. J. Biol. Chem. 268:22703–22709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Michaely, P., D. R. Tomchick, M. Machius, and R. G. Anderson. 2002. Crystal structure of a 12 ANK repeat stack from human ankyrinR. EMBO J. 21:6387–6396.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Mohler, P. J., A. O. Gramolini, and V. Bennett. 2002. The ankyrin-B C-terminal domain determines activity of ankyrin-B/G chimeras in rescue of abnormal inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and ryanodine receptor distribution in ankyrin-B (–/–) neonatal cardiomyocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 277:10599–10607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Mohler, P. J., I. Rivolta, C. Napolitano, G. Lemaillet, S. Lambert, S. G. Priori, and V. Bennett. 2004. Nav1.5 E1053K mutation causing Brugada syndrome blocks binding to ankyrin-G and expression of Nav1.5 on the surface of cardiomyocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:17533–17538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Mohler, P. J., J. J. Schott, A. O. Gramolini et al. 2003. Ankyrin-B mutation causes type 4 long-QT cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Nature 421:634–639.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Mohler, P. J., W. Yoon, and V. Bennett. 2004. Ankyrin-B targets beta2-spectrin to an intracellular compartment in neonatal cardiomyocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 279:40185–40193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Mosavi, L. K., T. J. Cammett, D. C. Desrosiers, and Z. Y. Peng. 2004. The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition. Protein Sci. 13:1435–1448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Nelson, W. J. 2003. Adaptation of core mechanisms to generate cell polarity. Nature 422:766–774.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Nicholas, K., H. Nicholas, and D. Deerfield. 1997. Genedoc: analysis and visualization of genetic variation. EMBNET News 4:1–4.

    Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer, Berlin.

    Otsuka, A. J., R. Franco, B. Yang et al. 1995. An ankyrin-related gene (unc-44) is necessary for proper axonal guidance in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 129:1081–1092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Otto, E., M. Kunimoto, T. McLaughlin, and V. Bennett. 1991. Isolation and characterization of cDNAs encoding human brain ankyrins reveal a family of alternatively spliced genes. J. Cell Biol. 114:241–253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Page, R. D. 1996. TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12:357–358.[Free Full Text]

    Pebusque, M. J., F. Coulier, D. Birnbaum, and P. Pontarotti. 1998. Ancient large-scale genome duplications: phylogenetic and linkage analyses shed light on chordate genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1145–1159.[Abstract]

    Pennisi, E. 2001. Molecular evolution. Genome duplications: the stuff of evolution? Science 294:2458–2460.[Free Full Text]

    Perriere, G., and M. Gouy. 1996. WWW-query: an on-line retrieval system for biological sequence banks. Biochimie 78:364–369.[Medline]

    Pollard, T. D. 2003. The cytoskeleton, cellular motility and the reductionist agenda. Nature 422:741–745.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Quednau, B. D., D. A. Nicoll, and K. D. Philipson. 1997. Tissue specificity and alternative splicing of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger isoforms NCX1, NCX2, and NCX3 in rat. Am. J. Physiol. 272:C1250–1261.[Medline]

    Robinson-Rechavi, M., B. Boussau, and V. Laudet. 2004. Phylogenetic dating and characterization of gene duplications in vertebrates: the cartilaginous fish reference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:580–586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Ruuskanen, J. O., H. Xhaard, A. Marjamaki, E. Salaneck, T. Salminen, Y. L. Yan, J. H. Postlethwait, M. S. Johnson, D. Larhammar, and M. Scheinin. 2004. Identification of duplicated fourth alpha2-adrenergic receptor subtype by cloning and mapping of five receptor genes in zebrafish. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:14–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Schmidt, H. A., K. Strimmer, M. Vingron, and A. von Haeseler. 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylegenetic analysis using quartet and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18:502–504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Spring, J. 2002. Genome duplication strikes back. Nat. Genet. 31:128–129.[ISI][Medline]

    Stevens, F. J. 2005. Efficient recognition of protein fold at low sequence identity by conservative application of Psi-BLAST: validation. J. Mol. Recognit. 18:139–149.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Thomas, G. H., E. C. Newbern, C. C. Korte, M. A. Bales, S. V. Muse, A. G. Clark, and D. P. Kiehart. 1997. Intragenic duplication and divergence in the spectrin superfamily of proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1285–1295.[Abstract]

    Virel, A., and L. Backman. 2004. Molecular evolution and structure of alpha-actinin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1024–1031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Wadsworth, W. G. 2002. Moving around in a worm: netrin UNC-6 and circumferential axon guidance in C. elegans. Trends Neurosci. 25:423–429.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    Wolfe, K. H., and W. H. Li. 2003. Molecular evolution meets the genomics revolution. Nat. Genet. 33(Suppl.):255–265.[Medline]

    Wolfe, K. H., and D. C. Shields. 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387:708–713.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Zimmer, E. A., S. L. Martin, S. M. Beverley, Y. W. Kan, and A. C. Wilson. 1980. Rapid duplication and loss of genes coding for the alpha chains of hemoglobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:2158–2162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Accepted for publication November 2, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
X. Cai
Unicellular Ca2+ Signaling 'Toolkit' at the Origin of Metazoa
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1357 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
H. A. Jackson, C. R. Marshall, and E. A. Accili
Evolution and structural diversification of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel genes
Physiol Genomics, May 11, 2007; 29(3): 231 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available </