MBE Advance Access originally published online on November 9, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(3):550-558; doi:10.1093/molbev/msj056
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Molecular Evolution of the Ankyrin Gene Family


* Howard Hughes Medical Institute and
Departments of Cell Biology, Biochemistry, and Neuroscience, Duke University Medical Center and
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center
E-mail: x.cai{at}cellbio.duke.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ankyrins are membrane adaptor molecules that play important roles in coupling integral membrane proteins to the spectrin-based cytoskeleton network. Human mutations of ankyrin genes lead to severe genetic diseases such as fatal cardiac arrhythmias and hereditary spherocytosis. To elucidate the evolutionary history of ankyrins, we have identified novel ankyrin sequences in insect, fish, frog, chicken, dog, and chimpanzee genomes and explored the phylogenetic relationships of the ankyrin gene family. Our data demonstrate that duplication of ankyrin genes occurred at two different stages. The first duplication resulted from an independent evolution event specific in Arthropoda after its divergence from Chordata. Following the separation from Urochordata, expansion of ankyrins in vertebrates involved ancestral genome duplications. We did not find evidence of coordinated arrangements of gene families of ankyrin-associated membrane proteins on paralogous chromosomes. In addition, evolution of the 24 ANK-repeats strikingly correlated with the exon boundary sites of ankyrin genes, which might have occurred before its duplication in vertebrates. Such correlation is speculated to bring functional diversity and complexity. Moreover, based on the phylogenetic analysis of the ANK-repeat domain, we put forward a novel model for the putative primordial ankyrin that contains the fourth sixANK-repeat subdomain and the spectrin-binding domain. These findings will provide guides for future studies concerning structure, function, evolutionary origins of ankyrins, and possibly other cytoskeletal proteins.
Key Words: cytoskeleton ankyrin genome duplication exon evolution repeat evolution
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dynamic interactions among cytoskeletal filaments and their associated proteins regulate many fundamental processes of eukaryotic cells such as cell motility, maintenance of the structural organization and mechanical function (Pollard 2003
The ankyrin gene family of mammals contains three membersANK1 (gene product ankyrin-R) (Lux, John, and Bennett 1990
), ANK2 (gene product ankyrin-B) (Otto et al. 1991
), and ANK3 (gene product ankyrin-G) (Kordeli, Lambert, and Bennett 1995
). Canonical ankyrins comprise three highly conserved domainsan N-terminal membrane-binding domain, a central spectrin-binding domain (SBD), and a death domain. In contrast, the C-terminal domains of ankyrins are very divergent (Bennett and Baines 2001
). The membrane-binding domain is composed of 24 copies of a 33-residue repeat known as the ANK-repeat. The 24 repeats are divided into four independently folded subdomains, each containing six repeats (Michaely and Bennett 1993
). Atomic structures of a 12ANK-repeat stack from human ankyrin-R (Michaely et al. 2002
) have revealed that individual ANK-repeats are assembled into the characteristic "L"-shaped structure consisting of two pairs of short antiparallel
-helices followed by a long loop and an intervening ß-hairpin motif that are arranged perpendicular to the helices.
SBD binds to ß-spectrin with high affinity (Davis and Bennett 1984
). The first 11-residue segment of the SBD of ankyrin-R seems to fold back and bind to ANK-repeat 2024 through a peptide-in-groove interaction in an extended conformation (Michaely et al. 2002
). Interaction between ankyrin-R and spectrin couples actin cytoskeleton to the plasma membrane of erythrocytes. Recently, ankyrin-B has been shown to be required for the normal localization of ß2-spectrin to an intracellular compartment in neonatal cardiomyocytes (Mohler, Yoon, and Bennett 2004
). In addition, studies using chimeras between ankyrin-G and ankyrin-B suggests that the SBD of ankyrin-G, but not ankyrin-B, might participate in protein pathways responsible for the lateral membrane biogenesis in human bronchial epithelial cells (Kizhatil and Bennett 2004
).
Death domains are found in proteins such as Fas and tumor necrosis factor receptors involved in signal transduction that leads to apoptosis (Hofmann and Tschopp 1995
). The role of the ankyrin death domain remains to be determined. In kidney, the death domain of ankyrin-G has been shown to interact with the death domain of Fas receptors and promote Fas-induced apoptosis in renal epithelia cells (Del Rio et al. 2004
). The C-terminal regulatory domain is highly variable among ankyrin family members, and therefore likely accounts for distinct physiological functions of different ankyrin molecules. Indeed, replacement of the C-terminal domain of ankyrin-B with that of ankyrin-G completely abolishes the function of ankyrin-B in targeting IP3 and ryanodine receptors in neonatal cardiomyocytes (Mohler, Gramolini, and Bennett 2002
).
Recent reports on the phylogeny of
-actinins of the spectrin superfamily have extended our understanding of their evolutionary origins (Dixson, Forstner, and Garcia 2003
; Virel and Backman 2004
). Mutations in the Caenorhabditis elegans ankyrin gene, unc-44, affect axonal guidance and result in uncoordinated movement (Otsuka et al. 1995
), indicating the importance of ankyrins in animal development. However, a comprehensive analysis on the evolutionary relationship of the ankyrin family members has been hindered by the limited number of ankyrin sequences in the public database. As of December 2004, an examination of the 6,207 ANK-repeat protein sequences (IPR002110) at the InterPro protein family database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/) revealed 31 ankyrin sequences and then pared down to only seven nonredundant ankyrin sequences.
Here, we have undertaken the first comprehensive and rigorous phylogenetic analysis of ankyrin sequences identified by extensive screenings of currently available whole-genome sequences. We have also examined the chromosomal distribution of ankyrin genes to explore the potential mechanisms leading to their expansion in vertebrates. Moreover, we have for the first time systematically examined the evolution of ankyrin repeats in terms of exon structure and repeat subdomains.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sequence Database Searches and Multiple Sequence Alignments
BlastP (Altschul et al. 1997
Protein sequence alignments were performed using ClustalX (version 1.83) (Jeanmougin et al. 1998
) and were subsequently manually edited to improve alignments in Genedoc (K. Nicholas, H. Nicholas, and Deerfield 1997
) as previously described (Cai and Lytton 2004
). Partial and duplicated sequences as well as alternatively spliced isoforms were excluded to confirm that only one ankyrin gene product of each type from each species was analyzed further for phylogenetic analysis.
Phylogenetic Analysis
Multiple alignment files adjusted by Genedoc were exported to files in PHYLIP format. All sequences were initially subject to the chi-square analysis for homogeneity of amino acid composition implemented in Tree-Puzzle (version 5.2) (Schmidt et al. 2002
). Sequences that failed in the chi-square test or contained more than 15% gaps in the refined alignments were extruded. Protein maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using PROML within the PHYLIP package (version 3.64) (Felsenstein 1996
), with the Jones-Taylor-Thornton amino acid substitution matrix, a mixed four-category discrete-gamma model of among-site rate variation plus invariable sites, and global arrangements and randomized input order of sequences (10 jumbles). The
parameter and the fraction of invariable sites were estimated using Tree-Puzzle. Protein ML-distance bootstrap values by analysis of 100 resampled data sets obtained using SEQBOOT (PHYLIP package) were calculated using PUZZLEBOOT (http://www.tree-puzzle.de) with the same settings as those employed for PROML.
Phylogenetic analyses with bootstrap values were also performed with the maximum parsimony (MP) method and the neighbor-joining (NJ) analysis as previously described (Cai and Lytton 2004
), using PROTPARS, and PROTDIST and NEIGHBOR programs in the PHYLIP package (Felsenstein 1996
), respectively. The Jones-Taylor-Thornton amino acid substitution matrix and a rate heterogeneity model with the gamma-distributed rates over four categories were used in the PROTDIST program. Weighted NJ analysis was performed with WEIGHBOR (Perriere and Gouy 1996
), using the distance matrix calculated by PROTDIST or Tree-Puzzle. The TREEVIEW program (version 1.6.6) (Page 1996
) and NJPLOT (Perriere and Gouy 1996
) were used to display the phylogenetic trees.
Mapping the Genomic Locations of Members of Ankyrin and Selected Gene Families
Extensive text-based searches for the chromosomal locations of ankyrin and selected gene families in the genomes of C. elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Gallus gallus, and H. sapiens were performed at the NCBI Map Viewer Web site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview/). Also, each genome sequence was examined with TBlastN searches using at least one gene homolog from each gene family to reveal additional chromosomal loci of members of these gene families. The chromosomal locations were described with the genetic linkage map (centimorgans), the sequence map (kilobases), or the cytogenetic map (banding pattern).
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To date, ankyrin genes have been cloned and characterized in C. elegans (Otsuka et al. 1995
|
Duplication Events of Ankyrin Genes Occurred at Two Different Stages
Multiple sequence alignments of 39 ankyrin sequences were manually edited, and sequences of the highly conserved regions, containing primarily the membrane-binding domain and the SBD, were used for further analysis. Four sequences (see table 1) were extruded after the initial analysis with Tree-Puzzle. Repeated motifs in many proteins undergo various homogenization events (Zimmer et al. 1980
|
The nematode genomes (C. elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae) contain single copies of ankyrin gene. The presence of two ankyrin members in the insect genomes suggested an initial gene duplication event occurred after the divergence into arthropoda. Clearly, the vertebrate ankyrins are grouped into three major branches, as previously defined in human (Bennett and Baines 2001
We believe that C. intestinalis contains only one copy of ankyrin gene based on the following three reasons. Firstly, C. intestinalis appears to possess single copies of many vertebrate gene families such as Nkx2 and bHLH Hand transcription factor families (Dehal et al. 2002
; Leveugle et al. 2004
). It has been proposed that large-scale gene duplications occurred after the vertebrates diverged from the cephalochordates and urochordates (Holland et al. 1994
). Secondly, no other homologous ankyrin sequences could be found in the current version of C. intestinalis genome sequence. Thirdly, it is unlikely that C. intestinalis might have lost two copies of ankyrin subsequently after the divergence. The C. intestinalis ankyrin (CinANK) does not branch with the three vertebrate ankyrin groups (fig. 1 and Figs. S1 and S2 [Supplementary Material online]). In contrast, if only one copy of ankyrin-B, R, or G from one of the vertebrate genomes is used in the analysis, this single copy is nevertheless grouped with one of the three vertebrate branches. The single CinANK gene subsequently evolved into three ankyrin genes, likely before the early Euteleostomi lineage, as the pufferfish T. nigroviridis contains all three vertebrate ankyrins.
Evolution of Vertebrate Ankyrins Might Involve Ancestral Genome Duplications
The phylogeny of vertebrate ankyrins was further analyzed with one outgroup chosen from invertebrates, CelANK (Figs. S3S5, Supplementary Material online). Comparison of the overall tree topologies clearly indicates that the clades of ankyrin-G and ankyrin-B are more closely related to each other compared with the ankyrin-R clade. It seems that ankyrin-B and G were derived from an ancestral ankyrin that diverged from ankyrin-R before the duplication event.
In 1970, Susumo Ohno first proposed that vertebrate genomes evolved through rounds of large-scale duplications (Ohno 1970
), possibly in the form of polyploidization. The area of ancient genome duplication in vertebrate lineage has been intensively investigated (Spring 2002
; Wolfe and Li 2003
). Recent phylogenetic analyses and comparative genome analyses provide strong evidence of large segmental (en bloc) duplication of vertebrate genomes (Pebusque et al. 1998
; Abi-Rached et al. 2002
; McLysaght, Hokamp, and Wolfe 2002
; Robinson-Rechavi, Boussau, and Laudet 2004
)but also see references suggesting coordinated arrangements of related gene families known to interact (Martin 2001
; Pennisi 2001
). Here, we are interested in investigating whether expansion of the vertebrate ankyrin family resulted from genome duplications. If the vertebrate ankyrin evolution was derived from genome duplications, other gene families located in the same chromosome regions should also be involved.
The single ankyrin gene in C. elegans is located on chromosome IV (cM 2.91). Members of several other gene families also placed on chromosome IV were chosen for genomic analysis, including UNC-5, choline acetyltransferase (CAT), vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT), IP3R, and L1CAM (Table S1, Supplementary Material online). UNC-5 is a transmembrane protein initially found to be involved in axon guidance in C. elegans (Leung-Hagesteijn et al. 1992
; Hamelin et al. 1993
). Recent studies demonstrate that members of UNC-5 family are netrin receptors mediating repulsion of axon migration (Wadsworth 2002
). CAT and VMAT have been used in a previous study (Pebusque et al. 1998
). IP3R and L1CAM are integral membrane proteins known to interact with the ankyrin cytoskeleton network (Chen, Ong, and Bennett 2001
; Mohler, Gramolini, and Bennett 2002
).
We combined Map Viewer searches using keyword queries and extensive TBlastN searches of genomes from C. elegans, D. melanogaster, G. gallus, and H. sapiens at the NCBI Web site. The genomic locations of five gene families in four species are shown in Table S1 (Supplementary Material online). In C. elegans, each gene family contains a single copy of the gene on chromosome IV. In D. melanogaster, almost all genes remain to be a single copy except ankyrin. As discussed above, in insects, a recent and independent gene duplication event of ankyrin likely occurred. Genomic locations of these genes in C. intestinalis remain unknown because its genomic assembling has not been finished.
In vertebrates, ankyrin, VMAT, and IP3R split into three members, and L1CAM and UNC-5 evolved to have four genes (Table S1 [Supplementary Material online] and fig. 2). It is predicted that the first round of genome duplication occurred just after the divergence of Cephalochordata and Craniata ancestors. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that urochordate C. intestinalis has a nonduplicated genome (Leveugle et al. 2004
). Ankyrin, UNC-5, and VMAT genes are all present on chromosome 10 and chromosome 8, along with the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and adrenergic receptor (ADR) genes (Pebusque et al. 1998
) and genes of several other familiesdickkopf, EIF4E-binding protein and calcineurin catalytic unit (Table S1, Supplementary Material online). Therefore, it seems likely that at least a part of chromosomes 10 and 8 might be derived together from the first round of duplication. Duplication of VMAT-2 (10q11.2) and VMAT-3 (10q24.3-25.1) might have evolved through a centromere-proximal duplication and an intrachromosomal rearrangement mechanism on chromosome 10q11 (Crosier et al. 2002
). Phylogenetic analyses have revealed that closer evolutionary relationships between HsaANK-G (chr10) and HsaANK-B (chr4) compared with HsaANK-R (chr8) (described above), UNC-5B (chr10) and UNC-5C (chr4) compared with UNC-5D (chr8) and UNC-5A (chr5) (data not shown), HsaFGFR-2 (chr10) and HsaFGFR-3 (chr4) compared with HsaFGFR-1 (chr8) and HsaFGFR-4 (chr5) (Coulier et al. 1997
), and ADRA2A (chr10) and ADRA2C (chr4) compared with ADRA1A (also known as ADRA1C) (chr8) and ADRA1B (chr5) (Ruuskanen et al. 2004
). Phylogeny of dickkopf, EIF4EBP, and PPP3C genes also indicates the same pattern (data not shown). These data suggest that at least a large segment of chromosomes 4 and 5 were likely duplicated from chromosomes 10 and 8 in the second round, respectively (fig. 2). It seems that a loss of related genes might have occurred after the second round of duplication, that is, no ankyrin gene could be found on chromosome 5, possibly due to functional redundancy. Analysis of yeast (Wolfe and Shields 1997
) and plant genomes (Kashkush, Feldman, and Levy 2002
) has suggested considerable gene loss following the duplication of the whole genome.
|
In contrast to the hypothesis of maintenance of functionally coupled gene families on paralogous chromosomes (Martin 2001
Our observation suggests that molecular evolution of the ankyrin family likely involved ancestral segmental genome duplications in vertebrates. Due to the limited number of gene families analyzed in this study based on our primary research interests, it should be noted that the conclusion here might not necessarily imply large-scale genome duplications in vertebrates. Caenorhabditis elegans and D. melanogaster are highly derived organisms even within their own phyla, which makes it difficult to detect the corresponding chromosome regions in invertebrates that could give rise to many other paralogous domains in vertebrates suggesting genome duplication (Spring 2002
). The ongoing genome assembly project of C. intestinalis as a primitive member of Chordata may provide promising opportunities to study the genome duplication hypothesis. Large-scale genome duplications causing a severe imbalance in gene product and resulting in rapid gene losses likely contributed to the early stage of vertebrate evolution, whereas segmental (small scale) duplications occurred constantly in vertebrate evolution (X. Gu, Wang, and J. Gu 2002
). Nevertheless, our observation is consistent with previous studies of segmental genome duplication of vertebrate genomes (Pebusque et al. 1998
; Abi-Rached et al. 2002
; McLysaght, Hokamp, and Wolfe 2002
; Robinson-Rechavi, Boussau, and Laudet 2004
).
Evolution of the 24 ANK-Repeats Correlated with the Exon Boundary Sites of Ankyrin Genes
A striking feature of all HsaANK genes is their unique organization of the coding exons for the 24 ANK-repeats (fig. 3). With four exceptions that one exon encodes two ANK-repeats (repeats 56, 1011, 1516, and 1920), the exon boundaries of HsaANK within the ANK-repeat region are corresponding to exactly a single ANK-repeat for each exon (99 nt/33 amino acids each). In contrast, CelANK and DmeANK contain three large coding exons that encode more than 20 ANK-repeats. The genomic structure of CinANK shows similar features with HsaANK18 individual ANK-repeats are encoded by single exons, while all fish DreANK genes exhibit the same exon structure as HsaANK (fig. 3). These data suggest that a common primitive ancestral ankyrin might have evolved to contain the modern exon structure after the divergence from Urochordata but before the expansion in vertebrates. Alternatively, although less likely, the modern exon structure might have been adapted from convergence evolution after the duplication in vertebrates.
|
The canonical ANK-repeat is composed of 33 amino acids with a characteristic L-shaped structure. Alternative splicing sites in Chordates could potentially fall within an ANK-repeat. But in order to maintain the reading frame, the activity and the rigid structure of the ANK-repeat, these sites must be consistent in the exact same location in each repeat involved, which could generate selective pressure (functional and structural constraints) on the evolution of the ankyrin exon-intron organization. The exact exonANK-repeat correlation might have occurred as the most economic and convenient evolution pattern under such pressure. The unique exon structures of the ANK-repeat region could then promote the diversity of ankyrin isoforms by different combinations of individual ANK-repeats as a result of alternative splicing. Such a mechanism could increase the specificity of ankyrins in mediating sorting and targeting of various membrane transporters by generating novel biological functions and/or complex cell and tissue-specific expression pattern. This idea is currently being explored in our laboratory.
Consistent with this hypothesis is the observation that ankyrin-associated integral membrane proteins such as NCX also undergo considerable tissue-specific alternative splicing in the large cytoplasmic loops speculated to bind ankyrin (Li et al. 1993
; Quednau, Nicoll, and Philipson 1997
). Interestingly, these alternative splice sites of NCX have been also shown to be more evident in vertebrates than in invertebrates (Marshall et al. 2005
). The evolution of complex physiology of vertebrates might require more precise regulation of targeting of diverse membrane proteins including different splice isoforms of the same gene to various specialized membrane domains of the cell. Characterization of the putative ankyrin isoforms with different combination of ankyrin repeats would provide novel insights into novel cellular pathways essential for vertebrate physiology.
Attempt to Identify the Evolutionary Origin of Ankyrins
Previous studies of the spectrin phylogeny suggested that once the number of spectrin repeats became constant, repeat sequences seemed to have evolved independently (Thomas et al. 1997
), and therefore, sequences from these fixed repeats might be reliable in building accurate phylogeny trees. The full-length ankyrins all contain exactly the same copies (24) of ANK-repeats in each molecule. The 24 ANK-repeats of ankyrins form four functionally important six repeat subdomains as basic protein interaction sites (Michaely and Bennett 1993
). Phylogenetic analysis of these sixANK-repeat sequences from four representative species was conducted with a prokaryotic sixANK-repeat sequence as an outgroup (SwissProt Q8Q0U0) (fig. 4 and Figs. S6 and S7 [Supplementary Material online]). Although the position of its clade in the trees was consistent in different phylogenetic analyses, the first six-repeat sequences at the N-terminus of the ANK-repeat domain did not generate reliable grouping pattern within its own clade. This is possibly due to lower conservation of the external protein repeats (Bork 1993
), which might have masked the evolutionary history between them. In all these trees, however, subdomain 4 containing last six repeats (repeats 1924) shows consistent distant evolutionary relationship with other three subdomains. Recent crystal structure of repeats 1324 of H. sapiens ankyrin-R suggests that the last six-repeat subdomain might play a role in fixing the orientation of the SBD (Michaely et al. 2002
). Because the spectrin-binding function is an essential component of ankyrins, we propose a novel model for the primordial ankyrin molecule predating the nematode CelANKthe putative primordial ankyrin contains primarily the last sixANK-repeat subdomain and the SBD.
|
Subsequently, TBlastN searches were performed to screen the NCBI genome databases of bacteria, archaea, and unicellular eukaryotes using truncated sequences of CelANK and HsaANK-B containing the last six ANK-repeats and the SBD, as well as their full-length sequences. Although our searches confirmed the abundance of ANK-repeat containing sequences in the genome databases (Bork 1993
In summary, this work has presented a comprehensive bioinformatics study of the ankyrin gene family, integrating genomic and phylogenetic analyses. Ankyrin genes were duplicated separately in arthropod and vertebrate lineages. Expansion of the vertebrate ankyrins appears to have resulted from segmental genome duplications. A novel model for the putative ankyrin ancestor has been proposed. These findings build a foundation for future studies concerning structural, functional, and evolutionary analyses of ankyrins and possibly other cytoskeletal proteins.
| Note Added in Proof |
|---|
|
|
|---|
While this manuscript was under review, Hopitzan, Baines, and Kordeli (2005)
| Supplementary Material |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Figures S1S7 and Table S1 at are available at Molecular Biology and Evolution online (http://www.mbe.oxfordjournals.org/).
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
X.C. thanks Vann Bennett (in whose laboratory this work was done) for his support and helpful discussions and Andrew Ravanelli for critical reading of this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Johnson and Johnson to Vann Bennett.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Claudia Schmidt-Dannert, Associate Editor
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abi-Rached, L., A. Gilles, T. Shiina, P. Pontarotti, and H. Inoko. 2002. Evidence of en bloc duplication in vertebrate genomes. Nat. Genet. 31:100105.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:33893402.
Amos, L. A., F. van den Ent, and J. Lowe. 2004. Structural/functional homology between the bacterial and eukaryotic cytoskeletons. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16:2431.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bennett, V., and A. J. Baines. 2001. Spectrin and ankyrin-based pathways: metazoan inventions for integrating cells into tissues. Physiol. Rev. 81:13531392.
Bennett, V., and P. J. Stenbuck. 1979. The membrane attachment protein for spectrin is associated with band 3 in human erythrocyte membranes. Nature 280:468473.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bork, P. 1993. Hundreds of ankyrin-like repeats in functionally diverse proteins: mobile modules that cross phyla horizontally? Proteins 17:363374.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bouley, M., M. Z. Tian, K. Paisley, Y. C. Shen, J. D. Malhotra, and M. Hortsch. 2000. The L1-type cell adhesion molecule neuroglian influences the stability of neural ankyrin in the Drosophila embryo but not its axonal localization. J. Neurosci. 20:45154523.
Burge, C., and S. Karlin. 1997. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 268:7894.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Cai, X., and J. Lytton. 2004. The cation/Ca2+ exchanger superfamily: phylogenetic analysis and structural implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:16921703.
Chen, L., B. Ong, and V. Bennett. 2001. LAD-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans L1CAM homologue, participates in embryonic and gonadal morphogenesis and is a substrate for fibroblast growth factor receptor pathway-dependent phosphotyrosine-based signaling. J. Cell Biol. 154:841855.
Coulier, F., P. Pontarotti, R. Roubin, H. Hartung, M. Goldfarb, and D. Birnbaum. 1997. Of worms and men: an evolutionary perspective on the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and FGF receptor families. J. Mol. Evol. 44:4356.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Crosier, M., L. Viggiano, J. Guy et al. 2002. Human paralogs of KIAA0187 were created through independent pericentromeric-directed and chromosome-specific duplication mechanisms. Genome Res. 12:6780.
Davis, J. Q., and V. Bennett. 1984. Brain ankyrin. A membrane-associated protein with binding sites for spectrin, tubulin, and the cytoplasmic domain of the erythrocyte anion channel. J. Biol. Chem. 259:1355013559.
Dehal, P., Y. Satou, R. K. Campbell et al. 2002. The draft genome of Ciona intestinalis: insights into chordate and vertebrate origins. Science 298:21572167.
Del Rio, M., A. Imam, M. DeLeon, G. Gomez, J. Mishra, Q. Ma, S. Parikh, and P. Devarajan. 2004. The death domain of kidney ankyrin interacts with Fas and promotes Fas-mediated cell death in renal epithelia. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15:4151.
Dixson, J. D., M. J. Forstner, and D. M. Garcia. 2003. The alpha-actinin gene family: a revised classification. J. Mol. Evol. 56:110.[ISI][Medline]
Dubreuil, R. R., and J. Yu. 1994. Ankyrin and beta-spectrin accumulate independently of alpha-spectrin in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1028510289.
Felsenstein, J. 1996. Inferring phylogenies from protein sequences by parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. Methods Enzymol. 266:418427.[ISI][Medline]
Gitai, Z. 2005. The new bacterial cell biology: moving parts and subcellular architecture. Cell 120:577586.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Gu, X., Y. Wang, and J. Gu. 2002. Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution. Nat. Genet. 31:205209.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hamelin, M., Y. Zhou, M. W. Su, I. M. Scott, and J. G. Culotti. 1993. Expression of the UNC-5 guidance receptor in the touch neurons of C. elegans steers their axons dorsally. Nature 364:327330.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hofmann, K., and J. Tschopp. 1995. The death domain motif found in Fas (Apo-1) and TNF receptor is present in proteins involved in apoptosis and axonal guidance. FEBS Lett. 371:321323.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Holland, P. W., J. Garcia-Fernandez, N. A. Williams, and A. Sidow. 1994. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Dev. Suppl. :125133.
Hopitzan, A. A., A. J. Baines, and E. Kordeli. 2006. Molecular evolution of ankyrin: gain of function in vertebrates by acquisition of an obscurin/titin-binding-related domain (OTBD). Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:4655.
Hopitzan, A. A., A. J. Baines, M. A. Ludosky, M. Recouvreur, and E. Kordeli. 2005. Ankyrin-G in skeletal muscle: tissue-specific alternative splicing contributes to the complexity of the sarcolemmal cytoskeleton. Exp. Cell Res. 309:8698.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Jeanmougin, F., J. D. Thompson, M. Gouy, D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1998. Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:403405.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Jenkins, S. M., and V. Bennett. 2001. Ankyrin-G coordinates assembly of the spectrin-based membrane skeleton, voltage-gated sodium channels, and L1 CAMs at Purkinje neuron initial segments. J. Cell Biol. 155:739746.
Kashkush, K., M. Feldman, and A. A. Levy. 2002. Gene loss, silencing and activation in a newly synthesized wheat allotetraploid. Genetics 160:16511659.
Kizhatil, K., and V. Bennett. 2004. Lateral membrane biogenesis in human bronchial epithelial cells requires 190-kDa ankyrin-G. J. Biol. Chem. 279:1670616714.
Kordeli, E., S. Lambert, and V. Bennett. 1995. AnkyrinG. A new ankyrin gene with neural-specific isoforms localized at the axonal initial segment and node of Ranvier. J. Biol. Chem. 270:23522359.
Leung-Hagesteijn, C., A. M. Spence, B. D. Stern, Y. Zhou, M. W. Su, E. M. Hedgecock, and J. G. Culotti. 1992. UNC-5, a transmembrane protein with immunoglobulin and thrombospondin type 1 domains, guides cell and pioneer axon migrations in C. elegans. Cell 71:289299.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Leveugle, M., K. Prat, C. Popovici, D. Birnbaum, and F. Coulier. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of Ciona intestinalis gene superfamilies supports the hypothesis of successive gene expansions. J. Mol. Evol. 58:168181.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Li, Z. P., E. P. Burke, J. S. Frank, V. Bennett, and K. D. Philipson. 1993. The cardiac Na+-Ca2+ exchanger binds to the cytoskeletal protein ankyrin. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1148911491.
Lopez, C., S. Metral, D. Eladari, S. Drevensek, P. Gane, R. Chambrey, V. Bennett, J. P. Cartron, C. Le Van Kim, and Y. Colin. 2004. The ammonium transporter RhBG: requirement of a tyrosine-based signal and ankyrin-G for basolateral targeting and membrane anchorage in polarized kidney epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 280:82218228.
Lux, S. E., K. M. John, and V. Bennett. 1990. Analysis of cDNA for human erythrocyte ankyrin indicates a repeated structure with homology to tissue-differentiation and cell-cycle control proteins. Nature 344:3642.[Medline]
Marshall, C. R., J. A. Fox, S. L. Butland, B. F. Ouellette, F. S. Brinkman, and G. F. Tibbits. 2005. Phylogeny of Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) genes from genomic data identifies new gene duplications and a new family member in fish species. Physiol. Genomics 21:161173.
Martin, A. 2001. Is tetralogy true? Lack of support for the "one-to-four rule". Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:8993.
McLysaght, A., K. Hokamp, and K. H. Wolfe. 2002. Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat. Genet. 31:200204.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Michaely, P., and V. Bennett. 1993. The membrane-binding domain of ankyrin contains four independently folded subdomains, each comprised of six ankyrin repeats. J. Biol. Chem. 268:2270322709.
Michaely, P., D. R. Tomchick, M. Machius, and R. G. Anderson. 2002. Crystal structure of a 12 ANK repeat stack from human ankyrinR. EMBO J. 21:63876396.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Mohler, P. J., A. O. Gramolini, and V. Bennett. 2002. The ankyrin-B C-terminal domain determines activity of ankyrin-B/G chimeras in rescue of abnormal inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and ryanodine receptor distribution in ankyrin-B (/) neonatal cardiomyocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 277:1059910607.
Mohler, P. J., I. Rivolta, C. Napolitano, G. Lemaillet, S. Lambert, S. G. Priori, and V. Bennett. 2004. Nav1.5 E1053K mutation causing Brugada syndrome blocks binding to ankyrin-G and expression of Nav1.5 on the surface of cardiomyocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:1753317538.
Mohler, P. J., J. J. Schott, A. O. Gramolini et al. 2003. Ankyrin-B mutation causes type 4 long-QT cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Nature 421:634639.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mohler, P. J., W. Yoon, and V. Bennett. 2004. Ankyrin-B targets beta2-spectrin to an intracellular compartment in neonatal cardiomyocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 279:4018540193.
Mosavi, L. K., T. J. Cammett, D. C. Desrosiers, and Z. Y. Peng. 2004. The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition. Protein Sci. 13:14351448.
Nelson, W. J. 2003. Adaptation of core mechanisms to generate cell polarity. Nature 422:766774.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nicholas, K., H. Nicholas, and D. Deerfield. 1997. Genedoc: analysis and visualization of genetic variation. EMBNET News 4:14.
Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer, Berlin.
Otsuka, A. J., R. Franco, B. Yang et al. 1995. An ankyrin-related gene (unc-44) is necessary for proper axonal guidance in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 129:10811092.
Otto, E., M. Kunimoto, T. McLaughlin, and V. Bennett. 1991. Isolation and characterization of cDNAs encoding human brain ankyrins reveal a family of alternatively spliced genes. J. Cell Biol. 114:241253.
Page, R. D. 1996. TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12:357358.
Pebusque, M. J., F. Coulier, D. Birnbaum, and P. Pontarotti. 1998. Ancient large-scale genome duplications: phylogenetic and linkage analyses shed light on chordate genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:11451159.[Abstract]
Pennisi, E. 2001. Molecular evolution. Genome duplications: the stuff of evolution? Science 294:24582460.
Perriere, G., and M. Gouy. 1996. WWW-query: an on-line retrieval system for biological sequence banks. Biochimie 78:364369.[Medline]
Pollard, T. D. 2003. The cytoskeleton, cellular motility and the reductionist agenda. Nature 422:741745.[CrossRef][Medline]
Quednau, B. D., D. A. Nicoll, and K. D. Philipson. 1997. Tissue specificity and alternative splicing of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger isoforms NCX1, NCX2, and NCX3 in rat. Am. J. Physiol. 272:C12501261.[Medline]
Robinson-Rechavi, M., B. Boussau, and V. Laudet. 2004. Phylogenetic dating and characterization of gene duplications in vertebrates: the cartilaginous fish reference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:580586.
Ruuskanen, J. O., H. Xhaard, A. Marjamaki, E. Salaneck, T. Salminen, Y. L. Yan, J. H. Postlethwait, M. S. Johnson, D. Larhammar, and M. Scheinin. 2004. Identification of duplicated fourth alpha2-adrenergic receptor subtype by cloning and mapping of five receptor genes in zebrafish. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1428.
Schmidt, H. A., K. Strimmer, M. Vingron, and A. von Haeseler. 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylegenetic analysis using quartet and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18:502504.
Spring, J. 2002. Genome duplication strikes back. Nat. Genet. 31:128129.[ISI][Medline]
Stevens, F. J. 2005. Efficient recognition of protein fold at low sequence identity by conservative application of Psi-BLAST: validation. J. Mol. Recognit. 18:139149.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Thomas, G. H., E. C. Newbern, C. C. Korte, M. A. Bales, S. V. Muse, A. G. Clark, and D. P. Kiehart. 1997. Intragenic duplication and divergence in the spectrin superfamily of proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:12851295.[Abstract]
Virel, A., and L. Backman. 2004. Molecular evolution and structure of alpha-actinin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:10241031.
Wadsworth, W. G. 2002. Moving around in a worm: netrin UNC-6 and circumferential axon guidance in C. elegans. Trends Neurosci. 25:423429.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Wolfe, K. H., and W. H. Li. 2003. Molecular evolution meets the genomics revolution. Nat. Genet. 33(Suppl.):255265.[Medline]
Wolfe, K. H., and D. C. Shields. 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387:708713.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zimmer, E. A., S. L. Martin, S. M. Beverley, Y. W. Kan, and A. C. Wilson. 1980. Rapid duplication and loss of genes coding for the alpha chains of hemoglobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:21582162.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Cai Unicellular Ca2+ Signaling 'Toolkit' at the Origin of Metazoa Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1357 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Jackson, C. R. Marshall, and E. A. Accili Evolution and structural diversification of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel genes Physiol Genomics, May 11, 2007; 29(3): 231 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||




50 for bipartitions are indicated at the relevant nodes. Trees obtained by NJ (Fig. S6) and MP (Fig. S7) analyses are available in Supplementary Material online. 6, sequences from ANK-repeat 1 to 6; 12, sequences from ANK-repeat 7 to 12; 18, sequences from ANK-repeat 13 to 18; and 24, sequences from ANK-repeat 19 to 24.
