Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(1):18-20. 2003
DOI:
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038
Pervasive Adaptive Evolution in Mammalian Fertilization Proteins



* Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington
Departments of Biology and Genetics, University of California, Riverside
Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mammalian fertilization exhibits species specificity, and the proteins mediating sperm-egg interactions evolve rapidly between species. In this study, we demonstrate that the evolution of seven genes involved in mammalian fertilization is promoted by positive Darwinian selection by using likelihood ratio tests (LRTs). Several of these proteins are sperm proteins that have been implicated in binding the mammalian egg coat zona pellucida glycoproteins, which were shown previously to be subjected to positive selection. Taken together, these represent the major candidates involved in mammalian fertilization, indicating positive selection is pervasive amongst mammalian reproductive proteins. A new LRT is implemented to determine if the dN/dS ratio is significantly greater than one. This is a more refined test of positive selection than the previous LRTs which only identified if there was a class of sites with a dN/dS ratio >1 but did not test if that ratio was significantly greater than one.
Key Words: positive Darwinian selection sexual conflict fertilization likelihood ratio test speciation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Components of the mammalian egg zona pellucida are subjected to positive Darwinian selection, indicating an adaptive value to diversify the primary amino acid sequence (Swanson et al. 2001). The zona pellucida is an elevated glycoproteineous envelope that surrounds the egg and is involved in the initial stages of sperm- egg interaction (Wassarman 1999). The sperm proteins binding the zona pellucida have been studied in great detail; however, no consensus yet exists as to their binding partners (Wassarman 1999). The observation that the egg coat proteins are subject to positive selection raised the question as to whether the sperm components also are subject to positive selection. The idea is that if the egg proteins evolve at a high rate, then the sperm receptors would have to evolve quickly through compensatory changes to maintain interaction. The selective pressure driving this rapid evolution remains unknown, but it could be the result of a conflict in the reproductive interests between males and females (sexual conflict), sperm competition, or sexual selection (Swanson and Vacquier 2002). In this study, we demonstrate that positive selection is pervasive among reproductive proteins involved in mammalian fertilization. These results suggest that understanding the evolution of fertilization proteins is necessary to determine the molecular basis of fertilization.
We compiled gene alignments from GenBank for several male and female mammalian reproductive proteins (table 1). We analyzed Zonadhesin (Zen, Hardy and Garbers 1995), PH20 (SPAM1, Lin et al. 1993), Fertilin ß (Adam2, Zhu, Bansal, and Evans 2000), Fertilin
(Adam1, Wong et al. 2001), CD9 (Miyado et al. 2000), Acrosin (Acr, Baba et al. 1994), Sperm protein 17 (SP17, Richardson, Yamasaki, and O'rand 1994), and ß- galactosyltransferase (gt, Miller, Macek, and Shur 1992). Some of these genes were extremely divergent, and we deleted regions that did not align reliably. The number of sequences we analyzed ranged from 5 to 10 per gene. All alignments are available from the authors on request, and the protein alignments used are available on the Molecular Biology and Evolution journal website as supplementary material (http://www.molbiolevol.org).
|
We tested for positive selection by comparing the number of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site (dN; amino acid replacement changes) to the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (dS; silent changes). Because these numbers are normalized for the number of sites, if selection were neutral (i.e., a pseudogene),
= dN/dS would equal one. A convincing sign of positive selection is when the
ratio significantly exceeds one (e.g., Yang and Bielawski 2000), indicating a functional benefit to diversify the amino acid sequence. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We used likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) to determine if any codon positions were associated with
significantly >1 and hence possibly subjected to positive Darwinian selection (Nielsen and Yang 1998; Yang et al. 2000). The power of these tests increases with increased sequence diversity and number. Simulation studies show that the tests are robust when the tree length is approximately one substitution per codon. All data sets analyzed had tree length greater than one substitution per codon (table 1). However, it should be noted that the low number of species may reduce the power and accuracy of these analyses (Anisimova, Bielawski, and Yang 2001, 2002). A neutral model (M7) with
assumed to be beta-distributed was compared with a selection model (M8) with two additional parameters: ps, the proportion of codons with dN/dS > 1, and
s, the value of
in these sites. Positive selection is inferred if the estimate of
s is larger than one if an LRT is significant. The LRT is performed by taking the negative of twice the log-likelihood difference between the nested models (M7 and M8) and comparing this to the
2 distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of parameters between the models (test I; table 1). For the M7 versus M8 comparison, there are two degrees of freedom. However, as noted in Yang et al. (2000) under the null hypothesis, one of the parameters is on the boundary of the parameter space and another parameter is not estimable. The use of two degrees of freedom is therefore an approximation that results in a conservative test. Another problem is that test I may result in a high proportion of significant tests even when there is no positive selection if the beta-distribution provides a poor fit to the true distribution of
in the interval (0, 1). For example, if much of the probability mass is located around
= 0.5 and
= 1.0, M8 may provide a significantly better fit to data than M7, with an estimate of
s > 1 with probability 0.5, although no positive selection occurs.
We, therefore, implemented a new version of the LRT which is robust to the assumptions regarding the distribution of
in (0, 1). It has the additional advantage that the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic follows from standard theory in contrast to test I. The test is performed by adding a category of sites with
s = 1 to the null model. The new modified null model M8A then specifies that the distribution of
follows a mixture between a beta-distribution and a point mass at
= 1. Model M8A is then compared with a version of model M8, constrained such that
s
1, using an LRT. The only difference between the models is that under the null model (M8A)
s = 1, whereas in the more general model (M8)
s
1. From standard theory (Chernoff 1954), it follows that the log-likelihood ratio statistic is asymptotically distributed as a 50:50 mixture of a point mass at zero and a
12-distribution.
Test II may in some cases have more power than test I because of the reduction in the degrees of freedom and because the true asymptotic distribution, and not an ad hoc approximation, is used. However, it may in other cases have less power if there exists a category of positively selected sites with a value of
that is only slightly larger than one.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using test I, there is evidence that most mammalian reproductive genes examined for positive selection have a class of sites with
s > 1, although ß-galactosyltransferase does not appear to contain any codons under putative positive selection. This indicates that these mammalian reproductive proteins are possibly subjected to positive Darwinian selection. In some cases, when positive selection was identified in a data set, the corresponding
s was barely greater than one. We, therefore, used the new version of the LRT described above (test II), which is robust to the distribution of
in (0, 1). All comparisons except for acrosin remained significant with this more stringent test of selection (test II; table 1). Thus, there is robust evidence that a large number of mammalian reproductive genes are subjected to positive Darwinian selection.
Sites predicted to be the targets of positive Darwinian selection were identified using an empirical Bayes approach (Nielsen and Yang 1998; Yang et al. 2000). In a few of the proteins studied, the active sites implicated to be involved in sperm-egg interaction have been identified. For example, a disintegrin-like domain in fertilin ß has been implicated in sperm-egg binding (Zhu, Bansal, and Evans 2000). Remarkably, the majority (>90%) of the sites in our analysis predicted to be under positive Darwinian selection with posterior probabilities greater than 0.90 fall in the C-terminal portion of the molecule containing this putative sperm-egg binding domain (see supplementary material: http://www.molbiolevol.org). A similar result was obtained for fertilin
(Wong et al. 2001). Although the selective pressure remains unknown, the observation that the sites predicted to be subjected to positive selection fall in putative sperm-eggbinding domains suggests a selective force relating to male-female interaction, in this case fertilization. These results combined with those of earlier studies (Swanson et al. 2001) suggest that evolutionary analyses such as those described in this study may be a powerful way to identify regions with putative functional significance, which could be tested in functional assays.
The finding of a large number of mammalian reproductive proteins being subjected to positive Darwinian selection may have profound implications on studies of fertility. For example, rapidly evolving reproductive molecules could lead to a mismatch in sperm-egg proteins, which could contribute to infertility. This would be analogous to matches in class I major histocompatibility complex molecules necessary for successful skin grafts or matching blood-type groups for blood transfusions. In sea urchins, there is a significant effect of the genotype of reproductive proteins and the success of individual crosses within a population of one species (Palumbi 1999). The sites predicted to be subjected to positive Darwinian selection in this study could be involved directly in sperm-egg interaction and thus may be good targets to develop nonhormonal means of contraception aimed at disrupting sperm-egg interaction. Finally, inclusion of evolutionary diversification may help clarify some of the controversies in mammalian fertilization that have arisen due to diverse experimental observations (Wassarman 1999). Our results suggest that analyses for the coevolution of rapidly evolving male- female reproductive proteins may provide evidence that is consistent with interaction between some of the proposed, yet controversial, sperm-eggbinding pairs. Currently, sufficient data are not available to perform these coevolution analyses.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We thank Drs. J. Calkins and R. Cardullo and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by NSF grant DEB- 0111613 to W.J.S. and NSF grant DEB-0089487 to R.N.
| Footnotes |
|---|
E-mail: wswanson{at}gs.washington.edu.
| Literature Cited |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anisimova, M., J. P. Bielawski, and Z. Yang. 2001. Accuracy and power of the likelihood ratio test in detecting adaptive molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol 18:1585-1592.
Anisimova, M. 2002. Accuracy and power of Bayes prediction of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:950-958.
Baba, T., S. Azuma, S.-I. Kashiwabara, and Y. Toyoda. 1994. Sperm from mice carrying a target mutation of the acrosin gene can penetrate the oocyte zona pellucida and effect fertilization. J. Biol. Chem 269:31845-31849.
Chernoff, H. 1954. On the distribution of the likelihood ratio. Ann. Math. Stat 25:573-578.[CrossRef]
Hardy, D. M., and D. L. Garbers. 1995. A sperm membrane protein that binds in a species-specific manner to the egg extracellular matrix is homologous to von Willebrand factor. J. Biol. Chem 270:26025-26028.
Lin, Y., L. H. Kimmel, D. G. Myles, and P. Primakoff. 1993. Molecular cloning of the human and monkey sperm surface protein PH-20. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10071- 10075.
Miller, D. J., M. B. Macek, and B. D. Shur. 1992. Complementarity between sperm surface beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase and egg-coat ZP3 mediates sperm-egg binding. Nature 357:589-593.[CrossRef][Medline]
Miyado, K., G. Yamada, S. Yamada, et al. (12 co-authors) 2000. Requirement of CD9 on the egg plasma membrane for fertilization. Science (Washington DC) 287:321-324.
Nielsen, R., and Z. Yang. 1998. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148:929-936.
Palumbi, S. R. 1999. All males are not created equal: fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:12632- 12637.
Richardson, R. T., N. Yamasaki, and M. G. O'rand. 1994. Sequence of a rabbit sperm zona pellucida binding protein and localization during the acrosome reaction. Dev. Biol 165:688-701.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier. 2002. Rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet 3:137-144.[Web of Science][Medline]
Swanson, W. J., Z. Yang, M. F. Wolfner, and C. F. Aquadro . 2001. Positive Darwinian selection drives the evolution of several female reproductive proteins in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:2509-2514.
Wassarman, P. M. 1999. Mammalian fertilization: molecular aspects of gamete adhesion, exocytosis, and fusion. Cell 96:175-183.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wong, G. E., X. Zhu, C. E. Prater, E. Oh, and J. P. Evans . 2001. Analysis of fertilin alpha (ADAM1)-mediated sperm- egg cell adhesion during fertilization and identification of an adhesion-mediating sequence in the disintegrin-like domain. J. Biol. Chem 276:24937-24945.
Yang, Z., and J. P. Bielawski. 2000. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol 15:496- 503.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yang, Z., R. Nielsen, N. Goldman, and A. M. Pedersen. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.
Zhu, X., N. P. Bansal, and J. P. Evans. 2000. Identification of key functional amino acids of the mouse fertilin beta (ADAM2) disintegrin loop for cell-cell adhesion during fertilization. J. Biol. Chem 275:7677-7683.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P.-C. Liao, T.-P. Lin, W.-C. Lan, J.-D. Chung, and S.-Y. Hwang Duplication of the class I cytosolic small heat shock protein gene and potential functional divergence revealed by sequence variations flanking the {alpha}-crystallin domain in the genus Rhododendron (Ericaceae) Ann. Bot., November 3, 2009; (2009) mcp272v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Banke, M. R. Lillemark, J. Gerstoft, N. Obel, and L. B. Jorgensen Positive Selection Pressure Introduces Secondary Mutations at Gag Cleavage Sites in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Harboring Major Protease Resistance Mutations J. Virol., September 1, 2009; 83(17): 8916 - 8924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Smadja, P. Shi, R. K. Butlin, and H. M. Robertson Large Gene Family Expansions and Adaptive Evolution for Odorant and Gustatory Receptors in the Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2009; 26(9): 2073 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Viljakainen, J. D. Evans, M. Hasselmann, O. Rueppell, S. Tingek, and P. Pamilo Rapid Evolution of Immune Proteins in Social Insects Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2009; 26(8): 1791 - 1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Dean, N. L. Clark, G. D. Findlay, R. C. Karn, X. Yi, W. J. Swanson, M. J. MacCoss, and M. W. Nachman Proteomics and Comparative Genomic Investigations Reveal Heterogeneity in Evolutionary Rate of Male Reproductive Proteins in Mice (Mus domesticus) Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2009; 26(8): 1733 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Eberhard Colloquium Papers: Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences PNAS, June 16, 2009; 106(Supplement_1): 10025 - 10032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. May and D. R. Brown Diversifying and Stabilizing Selection of Sialidase and N-Acetylneuraminate Catabolism in Mycoplasma synoviae J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2009; 191(11): 3588 - 3593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Findlay, M. J. MacCoss, and W. J. Swanson Proteomic discovery of previously unannotated, rapidly evolving seminal fluid genes in Drosophila Genome Res., May 1, 2009; 19(5): 886 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Weadick and B. S.W. Chang Molecular Evolution of the {beta}{gamma} Lens Crystallin Superfamily: Evidence for a Retained Ancestral Function in {gamma}N Crystallins? Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2009; 26(5): 1127 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gardiner, R. K Butlin, W. C Jordan, and M. G Ritchie Sites of evolutionary divergence differ between olfactory and gustatory receptors of Drosophila Biol Lett, April 23, 2009; 5(2): 244 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Tian, G. Pascal, S. Fouchecourt, P. Pontarotti, and P. Monget Gene Birth, Death, and Divergence: The Different Scenarios of Reproduction-Related Gene Evolution Biol Reprod, April 1, 2009; 80(4): 616 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wlasiuk, S. Khan, W. M. Switzer, and M. W. Nachman A History of Recurrent Positive Selection at the Toll-Like Receptor 5 in Primates Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2009; 26(4): 937 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Anisimova and C. Kosiol Investigating Protein-Coding Sequence Evolution with Probabilistic Codon Substitution Models Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2009; 26(2): 255 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Delport, K. Scheffler, and C. Seoighe Models of coding sequence evolution Brief Bioinform, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 97 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. C. Almeida and R. DeSalle Orthology, Function and Evolution of Accessory Gland Proteins in the Drosophila repleta Group Genetics, January 1, 2009; 181(1): 235 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Albu, X. J. Min, D. Hickey, and B. Golding Uncorrected Nucleotide Bias in mtDNA Can Mimic the Effects of Positive Darwinian Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2008; 25(12): 2521 - 2524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Karn, N. L. Clark, E. D. Nguyen, and W. J. Swanson Adaptive Evolution in Rodent Seminal Vesicle Secretion Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2301 - 2310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dupas, C. W. Gitau, A. Branca, B. P. Le Ru, and J.-F. Silvain Evolution of a Polydnavirus Gene in Relation to Parasitoid-Host Species Immune Resistance J. Hered., September 1, 2008; 99(5): 491 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Kosakovsky Pond, A. F.Y. Poon, A. J. Leigh Brown, and S. D.W. Frost A Maximum Likelihood Method for Detecting Directional Evolution in Protein Sequences and Its Application to Influenza A Virus Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 1809 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. C. Almeida and R. DeSalle Evidence of Adaptive Evolution of Accessory Gland Proteins in Closely Related Species of the Drosophila repleta Group Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 2043 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Turner, E. B. Chuong, and H. E. Hoekstra Comparative Analysis of Testis Protein Evolution in Rodents Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2075 - 2089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhao and R. J. Epstein Programmed Genetic Instability: A Tumor-Permissive Mechanism for Maintaining the Evolvability of Higher Species through Methylation-Dependent Mutation of DNA Repair Genes in the Male Germ Line Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1737 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Llopart and J. M. Comeron Recurrent Events of Positive Selection in Independent Drosophila Lineages at the Spermatogenesis Gene roughex Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1009 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Kelley and W. J. Swanson Dietary Change and Adaptive Evolution of enamelin in Humans and Among Primates Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1595 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Dean, J. M. Good, and M. W. Nachman Adaptive Evolution of Proteins Secreted during Sperm Maturation: An Analysis of the Mouse Epididymal Transcriptome Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 383 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bhutkar, S. M. Russo, T. F. Smith, and W. M. Gelbart Genome-scale analysis of positionally relocated genes Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1880 - 1887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Streisfeld and M. D. Rausher Relaxed Constraint and Evolutionary Rate Variation between Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Floral Anthocyanin Regulators in Ipomoea Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2816 - 2826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Karr Fruit flies and the sperm proteome Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2007; 16(R2): R124 - R133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Williams, G. Leung, H. Maiato, A. Wong, Z. Li, E. V. Williams, C. Kirkpatrick, C. F. Aquadro, C. L. Rieder, and M. L. Goldberg Mitch a rapidly evolving component of the Ndc80 kinetochore complex required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2007; 120(20): 3522 - 3533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang and J. Zhang Rapid evolution of primate ESX1, an X-linked placenta- and testis-expressed homeobox gene Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2007; 16(17): 2053 - 2060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Radhakrishnan, M. A. Fares, F. S. French, and S. H. Hall Comparative genomic analysis of a mammalian {beta}-defensin gene cluster Physiol Genomics, August 20, 2007; 30(3): 213 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Stern, A. Doron-Faigenboim, E. Erez, E. Martz, E. Bacharach, and T. Pupko Selecton 2007: advanced models for detecting positive and purifying selection using a Bayesian inference approach Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W506 - W511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Mayrose, A. Doron-Faigenboim, E. Bacharach, and T. Pupko Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): i319 - i327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A Swann, S. J B Cooper, and W. G Breed Molecular evolution of the carboxy terminal region of the zona pellucida 3 glycoprotein in murine rodents Reproduction, April 1, 2007; 133(4): 697 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. King, P. N. Goodfellow, A. J. P. Wilkerson, W. E. Johnson, S. J. O'Brien, and J. Pecon-Slattery Evolution of the Male-Determining Gene SRY Within the Cat Family Felidae Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1855 - 1867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Hurle, W. Swanson, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, and E. D. Green Comparative sequence analyses reveal rapid and divergent evolutionary changes of the WFDC locus in the primate lineage Genome Res., March 1, 2007; 17(3): 276 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Foret and R. Maleszka Function and evolution of a gene family encoding odorant binding-like proteins in a social insect, the honey bee (Apis mellifera) Genome Res., November 1, 2006; 16(11): 1404 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Turner and H. E. Hoekstra Adaptive Evolution of Fertilization Proteins within a Genus: Variation in ZP2 and ZP3 in Deer Mice (Peromyscus) Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2006; 23(9): 1656 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Wilson and G. McVean Estimating Diversifying Selection and Functional Constraint in the Presence of Recombination Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1411 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M Panhuis, N. L Clark, and W. J Swanson Rapid evolution of reproductive proteins in abalone and Drosophila Phil Trans R Soc B, February 28, 2006; 361(1466): 261 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Bulmer and R. H. Crozier Variation in Positive Selection in Termite GNBPs and Relish Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. L Clark, J. E Aagaard, and W. J Swanson Evolution of reproductive proteins from animals and plants Reproduction, January 1, 2006; 131(1): 11 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Jiggins and K.-W. Kim The Evolution of Antifungal Peptides in Drosophila Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1847 - 1859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Scheffler and C. Seoighe A Bayesian Model Comparison Approach to Inferring Positive Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2531 - 2540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nei Selectionism and Neutralism in Molecular Evolution Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2318 - 2342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Podlaha, D. M. Webb, P. K. Tucker, and J. Zhang Positive Selection for Indel Substitutions in the Rodent Sperm Protein Catsper1 Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2005; 22(9): 1845 - 1852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Paterson The competitive Darwin Paleobiology, June 1, 2005; 31(2_Suppl): 56 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Gerrard and D. A. Filatov Positive and Negative Selection on Mammalian Y Chromosomes Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2005; 22(6): 1423 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Spady, O. Seehausen, E. R. Loew, R. C. Jordan, T. D. Kocher, and K. L. Carleton Adaptive Molecular Evolution in the Opsin Genes of Rapidly Speciating Cichlid Species Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2005; 22(6): 1412 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Edwards, S. B. Kingan, J. D. Calkins, C. N. Balakrishnan, W. B. Jennings, W. J. Swanson, and M. D. Sorenson Speciation in birds: Genes, geography, and sexual selection PNAS, May 3, 2005; 102(suppl_1): 6550 - 6557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Good and M. W. Nachman Rates of Protein Evolution Are Positively Correlated with Developmental Timing of Expression During Mouse Spermatogenesis Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 1044 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Massingham and N. Goldman Detecting Amino Acid Sites Under Positive Selection and Purifying Selection Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1753 - 1762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Jobson, R. Nielsen, L. Laakkonen, M. Wikstrom, and V. A. Albert Adaptive evolution of cytochrome c oxidase: Infrastructure for a carnivorous plant radiation PNAS, December 28, 2004; 101(52): 18064 - 18068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Schmidt and R. Durrett Adaptive Evolution Drives the Diversification of Zinc-Finger Binding Domains Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2004; 21(12): 2326 - 2339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Swanson, A. Wong, M. F. Wolfner, and C. F. Aquadro Evolutionary Expressed Sequence Tag Analysis of Drosophila Female Reproductive Tracts Identifies Genes Subjected to Positive Selection Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1457 - 1465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. W. Wong, Z. Yang, N. Goldman, and R. Nielsen Accuracy and Power of Statistical Methods for Detecting Adaptive Evolution in Protein Coding Sequences and for Identifying Positively Selected Sites Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1041 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Whelan and N. Goldman Estimating the Frequency of Events That Cause Multiple-Nucleotide Changes Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 2027 - 2043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. W. Wong and R. Nielsen Detecting Selection in Noncoding Regions of Nucleotide Sequences Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 949 - 958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. B. DuMont, J. C. Fay, P. P. Calabrese, and C. F. Aquadro DNA Variability and Divergence at the Notch Locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: A Case of Accelerated Synonymous Site Divergence Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 171 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sundstrom, M. T. Webster, and H. Ellegren Reduced Variation on the Chicken Z Chromosome Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 377 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Glassey and A. Civetta Positive Selection at Reproductive ADAM Genes with Potential Intercellular Binding Activity Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2004; 21(5): 851 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schein, Z. Yang, T. Mitchell-Olds, and K. J. Schmid Rapid Evolution of a Pollen-Specific Oleosin-Like Gene Family from Arabidopsis thaliana and Closely Related Species Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2004; 21(4): 659 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ceplitis and H. Ellegren Adaptive Molecular Evolution of HINTW, a Female-Specific Gene in Birds Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2004; 21(2): 249 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Pogson and K. A. Mesa Positive Darwinian Selection at the Pantophysin (Pan I) Locus in Marine Gadid Fishes Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 65 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Torgerson and R. S. Singh Sex-Linked Mammalian Sperm Proteins Evolve Faster Than Autosomal Ones Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2003; 20(10): 1705 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


















