Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:2261-2264 (2002)
© 2002 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Heteroplasmy and Evidence for Recombination in the Mitochondrial Control Region of the Flatfish Platichthys flesus

*Department of Marine Biology, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen;
Laboratoire Biologie Cellulaire 4, Université Paris-Sud
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The general assumption that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) does not undergo recombination has been challenged recently in invertebrates. Here we present the first direct evidence for recombination in the mtDNA of a vertebrate, the flounder Platichthys flesus. The control region in the mtDNA of this flatfish is characterized by the presence of a variable number of tandem repeats and a high level of heteroplasmy. Two types of repeats were recognized, differing by two C-T point mutations. Most individuals carry a pure "C" or a pure "T" array, but one individual showed a compound "CT" array. Such a compound array is evidence for recombination in the mtDNA control region from the flounder.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has generally been assumed that animal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) does not undergo recombination. This assumption has come from indirect evidence such as failure to detect excision repair activity and crossover products (Clayton, Doda, and Friedberg 1975
Here, we provide the first direct evidence of recombination in the mtDNA of a vertebrate, the flounder Platichthys flesus (Teleostei: Pleuronectiformes [flatfish]). In flounder, as in many other fishes (Nesbo, Arab, and Jakobsen 1998
, Ludwig et al. 2000
), the 5'-end of the mitochondrial control region is characterized by the presence of a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs) and a high level of length heteroplasmy for this region. The cause of variation in the repeat number is not fully understood but is variously attributed to slipped strand mispairing, illegitimate elongation, and termination-associated sequence (TAS)-based replication (Ludwig et al. 2000
). It may also be caused by mtDNA recombination, although this is more difficult to demonstrate when VNTRs consist of perfect repeats.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 168 individuals of flounder collected from five locations in the northern Atlantic and the Mediterranean were used to analyze the variation of the VNTRs and the extent of heteroplasmy (table 1 ). Total genomic DNA was extracted using a Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide protocol (Hoarau et al. 2002
|
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nearly all (165 of 168) individuals were heteroplasmic (table 1 ), containing 39 length variants per individual. The basic repeat unit is 19 bp long and the number of repeats ranges from 1 to 10. From the total set of 168 individuals, 18 individuals were chosen for further characterization. First, PCR products were cloned from these individuals and between 6 and 48 clones per individual (total of 288) were then reamplified and run on a gel to confirm that only one band was present as expected from individual clones. This was an important check because PCR artifacts (resulting in multiple bands) associated with these types of repeat motifs have been reported by Campbell, Sturm, and Barker (2001)
Again from the same set of 18 individuals, 36 clones per individual were sequenced (total of 84) to characterize the array motifs themselves and their number. Two types of core repeats were detected, a "C" type and a "T" type, which differed by two point mutations (fig. 1 ). Among the 18 individuals, 13 contained only the pure "C" type array, 4 only the pure "T" type array, and 1 individual a compound array of "C" and "T" (fig. 1A, B, and C , respectively). The compound array is indicative of mtDNA recombination. It is highly unlikely that the compound array arose by mutation as the differences between the "C" type and the "T" type involve two independent mutations and neither seems to be associated with secondary structure such as hairpin (no palindrome in the sequence of the repeat unit). Moreover these two positions are highly conserved in the closely related species, Pleuronectes platessa (unpublished data).
|
Once again, however, the issue of possible PCR artifacts arises because Taq polymerase can produce chimeric DNA molecules (i.e., PCR jumping sensu Paabo, Irvin, and Wilson 1990
Further support for true recombination comes from the fact that the recombinant "CT" array was found in each of three independent DNA extractions, PCR, and sequencing reactions from the recombinant individual. In addition, the entire DNA extraction, amplification, cloning, and sequencing procedure was conducted in an independent laboratory where no studies on fish have ever been conducted. Twelve clones were sequenced and recombinant "CT" arrays were found in seven clones and a parental "T" was found in the five other clones (table 2
). Interestingly, only one of the "parental" types ("T") is found together with recombinant arrays. This suggests that recombination took place at least a generation ago and that the other "parental" type ("C") was lost by random drift during ontogenesis or gametogenesis (Chinnery et al. 2000
). Variation in the number of "C" or "T" repeats in recombinant arrays further suggests that other mechanisms, such as slipped strand mispairing, besides (or in addition to) recombination are involved in the evolution of the number of repeats.
|
Recombination can explain the evolution of mtDNA VNTRs, but it is usually difficult to trace when VNTRs exist as perfect arrays. Because flounder VNTRs are imperfect and the two different types of repeat unit are found, the demonstration of mtDNA recombination is straightforward.
In principle, an alternative hypothesis to recombination could be that the compound array is the ancestral form and that the derived type of array we have observed evolved by a series of duplication-and-loss events. In this scenario, the two mutations (i.e., switching between the C to T type and vice versa) occurred in a duplicated region, such that both it and the ancestral form would be retained in the same individual. The different number of basic repeats could then be accounted for by a history of duplication and loss. Given the range in the number of repeat regions found (110), such duplications and losses might occur fairly regularly. However, we do not favor this alternative hypothesis because (1) if the "CT" arrays are indeed the ancestral form, then they should have been found more frequently in P. flesus and in closely related flatfish such as Pleuronectes platessa (plaice)plaice contains only one repeat, suggesting that the ancestral form was one repeat and (2) this hypothesis requires that the two mutations be retained in the same individual, whereas the recombination scenario requires only that the two types be present in the same population.
The mtDNA recombination we found between "C" and "T" type arrays in flounder has several implications for vertebrate mtDNA in general. Before such recombination is possible, the "C" and "T" type mitochondria must be present in the same cell and their DNA must be coupled. This implies paternal leakage followed by fusion of the mitochondria. Paternal leakage has been reported for mice (Gyllensten et al. 1991
) and anchovies (Magoulas and Zouros 1993
), whereas fusion of mitochondria has been demonstrated in Drosophila (Yaffe 1999
), and the enzymes necessary for recombination have been found in human mitochondria (Thyagarajan, Padua, and Campbell 1996
). It appears therefore that all these properties are present in flounder and in vertebrates more generally.
The importance of recombination in vertebrate mitochondria has broad implications across several fields, ranging from human mitochondrial diseases (Schon 2000
) to the compromise of phylogenetic and population studies that assume strict clonal inheritance of mtDNA (Schierup and Hein 2000
). In the case of human mitochondrial diseases, mtDNA recombination will greatly change the mode and patterns of inheritance, which in turn may affect current diagnostic methods. Recombination can also affect the accuracy of phylogenetic reconstruction (Posada and Crandall 2002
), inferences related to demographic history, and the application of molecular clocks (Schierup and Hein 2000
).
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We thank J. Coyer and M-P. Oudot-Le Secq and two anonymous reviewers for comments and corrections on the earlier versions of the manuscriptespecially with respect to the alternative hypothesis to recombination. We also thank H. Van der Veer and R. Gesser for providing samples, S. Boele-Bos for laboratory assistance, and L. Van de Zande for laboratory facilities. This research was supported by NWO-Prioriteit Programma "Sustainable Use of Marine Natural Resources" Project No. 885-10.101-P.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Edward Holmes, Reviewing Editor
Keywords: heteroplasmy
recombination
mitochondria
DLoop
VNTR
Platichthys flesus ![]()
Address for correspondence and reprints: Galice Hoarau, Department of Marine Biology, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands. E-mail: g.hoarau{at}biol.rug.nl ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Awadalla P., A. Eyre-Walker, J. Maynard Smith, 1999 Linkage disequilibrium and recombination in hominid mitochondrial DNA Science 284:2090-2091
Campbell N. J. H., R. A. Sturm, S. C. Barker, 2001 Large mitochondrial repeats multiplied during the polymerase chain reaction Mol. Ecol. Notes 1:336.
Chinnery P. F., D. R. Thorburn, D. C. Samuels, S. L. White, H.-H. M. Dahl, D. M. Turnbull, R. N. Lightowlers, N. Howell, 2000 The inheritance of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy: random drift, selection or both? Trends Genet 16:500-505[Web of Science][Medline]
Clayton D. A., J. N. Doda, E. C. Friedberg, 1975 The absence of a pyrimidine dimer repair mechanism in mammalian mitochondria Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:2777-2781
Eyre-Walker A., N. H. Smith, J. Maynard Smith, 1999 How clonal are human mitochondria? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 266:477-483[Medline]
Gyllensten U., D. Wharton, A. Josefsson, A. C. Wilson, 1991 Paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in mice Nature 352:255-257[Medline]
Hoarau G., A. D. Rijnsdorp, H. W. Van der Veer, W. T. Stam, J. L. Olsen, 2002 Population structure of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) in northern Europe: microsatellites revealed large scale spatial and temporal homogeneity Mol. Ecol 11:1165-1176[Medline]
Howell N., 1997 MtDNA recombination: what do in vitro data mean? Am. J. Hum. Genet 61:19-22[Medline]
Ladoukakis E. D., E. Zouros, 2001 Direct evidence for homologous recombination in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) mitochondrial DNA E. Mol. Biol. Evol 18:1168-1175
Lee W. J., J. Conroy, W. H. Howell, T. D. Kocher, 1995 Structure and evolution of teleost mitochondrial control regions J. Mol. Evol 41:54-66[Web of Science][Medline]
Ludwig A., B. May, L. Debus, I. Jenneckens, 2000 Heteroplasmy in the mtDNA control region of sturgeon (Acipenser, Huso, and Scaphirhynchus) Genetics 156:1933-1947
Lunt D. H., B. C. Hyman, 1997 Animal mitochondrial DNA recombination Nature 387:247.[Medline]
Magoulas A., E. Zouros, 1993 Restriction-site heteroplasmy in anchovy (Engraulis encrasicholus) indicates incidental biparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA Mol. Biol. Evol 10:319-325[Web of Science]
Nesbo C. L., M. O. Arab, K. S. Jakobsen, 1998 Heteroplasmy, length and sequence variation in the mtDNA control regions of three percid fish species (Perca fluviatilis, Acerina cernua, Stizostedion lucioperca) Genetics 148:1907-1919
Paabo S., D. M. Irwin, A. C. Wilson, 1990 DNA damage promotes jumping between templates during enzymatic amplification J. Biol. Chem 265:4718-4721
Posada D., K. A. Crandall, 2002 The effect of recombination on the accuracy of phylogeny estimation J. Mol. Evol 54:396-402[Web of Science][Medline]
Satoh M., T. Kuriowa, 1991 Organization of multiple nucleoids and DNA molecules in mitochondria of a human cell Exp. Cell Res 196:137-140[Web of Science][Medline]
Schierup M. H., J. Hein, 2000 Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis Genetics 156:879-891
Schon E. A., 2000 Mitochondrial genetics and disease Trends Biochem. Sci 25:555-560[Web of Science][Medline]
Thyagarajan B., R. A. Padua, C. Campbell, 1996 Mammalian mitochondria possess homologous DNA recombination activity J. Biol. Chem 271:27536-27543
Yaffe P. M., 1999 The machinery of mitochondrial inheritance and behavior Science 283:1493-1497
Zuckerman S. H., J. F. Solus, F. P. Gillespie, J. M. Eisenstadt, 1984 Retention of both parental mitochondrial DNA species in mouse-Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids Somat. Cell Mol. Genet 10:85-91[Web of Science][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Kijewska, A. Burzynski, and R. Wenne Molecular identification of European flounder (Platichthys flesus) and its hybrids with European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) ICES J. Mar. Sci., June 1, 2009; 66(5): 902 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Wolff, S. Gandre, A. Kalinin, and N. J. Gemmell Delimiting the Frequency of Paternal Leakage of Mitochondrial DNA in Chinook Salmon Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1029 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L Ciborowski, S. Consuegra, C. Garcia de Leaniz, M. A Beaumont, J. Wang, and W. C Jordan Rare and fleeting: an example of interspecific recombination in animal mitochondrial DNA Biol Lett, October 22, 2007; 3(5): 554 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tang and B. C. Hyman Mitochondrial Genome Haplotype Hypervariation Within the Isopod Parasitic Nematode Thaumamermis cosgrovei Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 1139 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. M. Amer and Y. Kumazawa The Mitochondrial Genome of the Lizard Calotes versicolor and a Novel Gene Inversion in South Asian Draconine Agamids Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 1330 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rubinoff, S. Cameron, and K. Will A Genomic Perspective on the Shortcomings of Mitochondrial DNA for "Barcoding" Identification J. Hered., November 1, 2006; 97(6): 581 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Guo, S. Liu, and Y. Liu Evidence for Recombination of Mitochondrial DNA in Triploid Crucian Carp Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1745 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Jaramillo-Correa and J. Bousquet Mitochondrial Genome Recombination in the Zone of Contact Between Two Hybridizing Conifers Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1951 - 1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Tsaousis, D. P. Martin, E. D. Ladoukakis, D. Posada, and E. Zouros Widespread Recombination in Published Animal mtDNA Sequences Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 925 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Piganeau, M. Gardner, and A. Eyre-Walker A Broad Survey of Recombination in Animal Mitochondria Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2004; 21(12): 2319 - 2325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C type repeat, 



