Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perdue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nuzhdin, S. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perdue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nuzhdin, S. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:984-986 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


Letter to the Editor

Master Copy Is Not Responsible for the High Rate of copia Transposition in Drosophila

Sarah Perdue and Sergey V. Nuzhdin2,

Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California at Davis

The genome of Drosophila melanogaster—a model species for studying transposable element (TE) population dynamics—contains approximately 50 different families classified as transposons, long interspersed nuclear element (LINE)–type elements, and long terminal repeat (LTR)–containing retrotransposons that resemble viruses. There are, on average, 20 copies per family, with a few base pairs different between copies within a family (Charlesworth, Sniegowski, and Stephan 1994Citation ). copia and gypsy—the best studied LTR elements—are inactive in most laboratory lines. However, in several transposition-susceptible lines, they produce on the order of one new copy per genome per generation (for reviews, see Pelisson et al. 1997Citation ; Pasyukova, Nuzhdin, and Filatov 1998Citation ). Complex interactions between elements and host genes are responsible for susceptibility. In the case of gypsy elements, a copy of a permissive flamenco allele and a specific "rogue" sequence variant of gypsy are required in the maternal genome for transpositions to occur in . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Acknowledgements
 

    Footnotes
 

    literature cited
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Papaceit, V. Avila, M. Aguade, and A. Garcia-Dorado
The Dynamics of the roo Transposable Element In Mutation-Accumulation Lines and Segregating Populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 511 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
P. Lopez-Sanchez, J. C. Costas, and H. F. Naveira
Paleogenomic Record of the Extinction of Human Endogenous Retrovirus ERV9
J. Virol., June 1, 2005; 79(11): 6997 - 7004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]