Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on April 15, 2008

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msn092
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slotte, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ceplitis, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slotte, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ceplitis, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Article

Polyploid speciation did not confer instant reproductive isolation in Capsella (Brassicaceae)

Tanja Slotte*,{dagger}, Huirun Huang*,{ddagger}, Martin Lascoux* and Alf Ceplitis*,§

* Evolutionary Functional Genomics, Department of Evolution, Genomics and Systematics, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18 D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
{ddagger} South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Leyiju, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510650, China
§ Department of Cell and Organism Biology (Genetics), Lund University, Sölvegatan 29, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden

Corresponding author: Tanja Slotte E-mail: tanjas{at}gmail.com Phone: +1-416-736-2100-44034

Received for publication December 11, 2007. Revision received March 12, 2008. Accepted for publication April 7, 2008.

Polyploid formation is a major mode of sympatric speciation in flowering plants. Unlike other speciation processes, polyploidization is often assumed to confer instant reproductive isolation. Shared polymorphism across ploidy levels has therefore often been attributed to multiple polyploid origins, while the alternative hypothesis of introgressive hybridization has rarely been rigorously tested. Here, we sequence 12 nuclear loci representing six genes duplicated by polyploidy in 92 accessions of the tetraploid C. bursa-pastoris, together with the corresponding loci in 21 accessions of its close diploid relative C. rubella. In C. bursa-pastoris accessions from western Eurasia, where the two species occur in partial sympatry, we find higher levels of nucleotide diversity than in accessions from eastern Eurasia, where C. rubella does not grow. Furthermore, haplotypes are shared across ploidy levels at four loci in western, but not in eastern Eurasia. We test whether haplotype sharing is due to retention of ancestral polymorphism or to hybridization and introgression using a coalescent-based isolation-with-migration model. In western, but not in eastern Eurasia, there is evidence for uni-directional gene flow from C. rubella to C. bursa-pastoris. An independent estimate of the timing of dispersal of C. bursa-pastoris to eastern Eurasia indicates that it probably pre-dated introgression. Our results show that polyploid speciation need not result in immediate and complete reproductive isolation, that post-polyploidization hybridization and introgression can contribute significantly to genetic variation in a newly formed polyploid, and that divergence population genetic analysis constitutes a powerful way of testing hypotheses on polyploid speciation.

Key Words: Capsella • introgression • polyploidy • Isolation-Migration model • speciation


{dagger} Current address: Department of Biology, York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto ON, Canada, M3J 1P3.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.