MBE Advance Access originally published online on September 15, 2004
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(1):178-188; doi:10.1093/molbev/msh267
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Sexual and Temporal Dynamics of Molecular Evolution in C. elegans Development

* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson; and
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson
E-mail: asher.cutter{at}ed.ac.uk
Dissection of the phenotypic and molecular details of development and differentiation is a centuries-old topic in evolutionary biology. However, an adequate understanding is missing for the molecular evolution of genes that are expressed differentially throughout developmentacross time, tissues, and the sexes. In this study, we investigate the dynamics of gene evolution across Caenorhabditis elegans ontogeny and among genes expressed differentially between each sex and gamete type. Using gene classes identified by genome-wide gene expression developmental time series and comparative sequence analysis with the congener C. briggsae, we demonstrate that genes expressed predominantly after reproductive maturity evolve more rapidly than genes expressed earlier in development and that genes expressed transiently during embryogenesis evolve faster than other embryonic transcripts. These results are indicative of relaxed selection on genes expressed after maturity, in accord with the mutation-accumulation model of aging. Furthermore, genes involved in spermatogenesis reveal more rapid evolution than other phenotypic classes of genes. Average rates of evolution among male soma-related genes indicates that selection acts to maintain males in these androdioecious species, despite their rarity, and the rapid evolution of sperm genes suggests that sexual selection acts on sperm development and function.
Key Words: Caenorhabditis elegans sexual selection evolution of aging evolutionary genomics
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Yanai and C. P. Hunter Comparison of diverse developmental transcriptomes reveals that coexpression of gene neighbors is not evolutionarily conserved Genome Res., December 1, 2009; 19(12): 2214 - 2220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-F. Jiang and C. A. Machado Evolution of Sex-Dependent Gene Expression in Three Recently Diverged Species of Drosophila Genetics, November 1, 2009; 183(3): 1175 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Jovelin Rapid Sequence Evolution of Transcription Factors Controlling Neuron Differentiation in Caenorhabditis Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2009; 26(10): 2373 - 2386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Cutter, A. Dey, and R. L. Murray Evolution of the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2009; 26(6): 1199 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ramsay, L. H. Rieseberg, and K. Ritland The Correlation of Evolutionary Rate with Pathway Position in Plant Terpenoid Biosynthesis Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2009; 26(5): 1045 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Telonis-Scott, A. Kopp, M. L. Wayne, S. V. Nuzhdin, and L. M. McIntyre Sex-Specific Splicing in Drosophila: Widespread Occurrence, Tissue Specificity and Evolutionary Conservation Genetics, February 1, 2009; 181(2): 421 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Artieri, W. Haerty, B. P. Gupta, and R. S. Singh Sexual Selection and Maintenance of Sex: Evidence from Comparisons of Rates of Genomic Accumulation of Mutations and Divergence of Sex-Related Genes in Sexual and Hermaphroditic Species of Caenorhabditis Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 972 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Cutter, J. D. Wasmuth, and N. L. Washington Patterns of Molecular Evolution in Caenorhabditis Preclude Ancient Origins of Selfing Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2093 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. LaMunyon, O. Bouban, and A. D. Cutter Postcopulatory Sexual Selection Reduces Genetic Diversity in Experimental Populations of Caenorhabditis elegans J. Hered., January 1, 2007; 98(1): 67 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Bauer DuMont, H. A. Flores, M. H. Wright, and C. F. Aquadro Recurrent Positive Selection at Bgcn, a Key Determinant of Germ Line Differentiation, Does Not Appear to be Driven by Simple Coevolution with Its Partner Protein Bam Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 182 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Cutter, J. D. Wasmuth, and M. L. Blaxter The Evolution of Biased Codon and Amino Acid Usage in Nematode Genomes Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2303 - 2315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Cutter, S. E. Baird, and D. Charlesworth High Nucleotide Polymorphism and Rapid Decay of Linkage Disequilibrium in Wild Populations of Caenorhabditis remanei Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 901 - 913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Cutter, M.-A. Felix, A. Barriere, and D. Charlesworth Patterns of Nucleotide Polymorphism Distinguish Temperate and Tropical Wild Isolates of Caenorhabditis briggsae Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2021 - 2031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Civetta, S. A. Rajakumar, B. Brouwers, and J. P. Bacik Rapid Evolution and Gene-Specific Patterns of Selection for Three Genes of Spermatogenesis in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 655 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Cutter Nucleotide Polymorphism and Linkage Disequilibrium in Wild Populations of the Partial Selfer Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 171 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Hillier, A. Coulson, J. I. Murray, Z. Bao, J. E. Sulston, and R. H. Waterston Genomics in C. elegans: So many genes, such a little worm Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1651 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Good and M. W. Nachman Rates of Protein Evolution Are Positively Correlated with Developmental Timing of Expression During Mouse Spermatogenesis Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 1044 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



