Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, Y. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, Y. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 9, 474-482, Copyright © 1992 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The cytochrome b and ATPase genes of honeybee mitochondrial DNA

RH Crozier and YC Crozier
Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

The gene sequences for honeybee cytochrome b, ATPase 6, and ATPase 8 are presented, along with the inferred amino acid sequences of the proteins. These mitochondrial genes are in the same relative positions as are their counterparts in Drosophila mitochondrial mtDNA and have evolved at a significantly greater overall rate than have those of Drosophila. Comparisons using both amino acid identity and the proportion of conservative replacements between the inferred Apis and vertebrate cytochrome b sequences shows the two highly conserved sections reported by Howell, but his recognition of five conserved regions is not well supported. A very high AT bias is reflected in very high codon biases. The best predictors of the number of occurrences of an amino acid in honeybee cytochrome b are the T and G contents of its codon family--unlike the case for vertebrate cytochrome b, in which the codon family size and AT bias are the strongest predictors; protein function, at least as judged by hydrophilicity characteristics, appears to be unaffected by these differing influences on amino acid composition.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
M. Pinter, D. D. Lent, and N. J. Strausfeld
Memory consolidation and gene expression in Periplaneta americana
Learn. Mem., January 1, 2005; 12(1): 30 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.