Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doshi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doshi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C. I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 8, 721-741, Copyright © 1991 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Molecular analysis of the responder satellite DNA in Drosophila melanogaster: DNA bending, nucleosome structure, and Rsp-binding proteins

P Doshi, S Kaushal, C Benyajati and CI Wu
Department of Biology, University of Rochester.

The Responder (Rsp) locus of Drosophila melanogaster, the target locus of segregation distortion, is a satellite DNA array. This repeat array imparts some fitness advantage to the chromosomes bearing it. In this paper, we report the following three related molecular properties of this satellite repeat: (1) Sequence-directed curvature--On a polyacrylamide gel, Rsp-containing fragments migrate slower than would be predicted on the basis of their physical sizes. The extent of migration retardation correlates with the size and position of the Rsp sequence in a DNA fragment, suggesting that Rsp DNA is bent. The bending is shown to be affected by a DNA-binding drug (Hoechst 33258). (2) Nucleosome structure--Nucleosomes associated with Rsp repeats have an unusual spacing pattern. Instead of being spaced at approximately 190-bp intervals as is the bulk chromatin, they are separated at approximately 240-bp intervals, roughly the size of a dimeric Rsp repeat. The nucleosomal structure in the Rsp region is preferentially disrupted by Hoechst 33258, whereas the bulk chromatin appears to be insensitive to the drug. (3) Rsp-DNA binding proteins--Gel mobility- shift assays using nuclear extracts from pupae and end-labeled Rsp repeat demonstrate the presence of three distinct DNA-protein complexes. Competition assays suggest that these complexes are specific to the Rsp sequence, and two of these nucleoprotein complexes seem to be influenced by the presence of Hoechst 33258. The observed complexes are formed by nonhistone proteins of somatic origin and may be related to the normal functions of Rsp, rather than to the germ-line segregation distortion activities.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
L L Wallrath and S C Elgin
Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure.
Genes & Dev., May 15, 1995; 9(10): 1263 - 1277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.