Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Laurie, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Laurie, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 8, 31-48, Copyright © 1991 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans

MS Thomson, JW Jacobson and CC Laurie
Department of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706.

Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) gene expression was analyzed in Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species D. simulans. The levels of ADH activity, ADH-cross-reacting material (CRM), and ADH-mRNA were analyzed for several strains of each species, which derive from diverse geographic locations around the world. There is considerable quantitative variation in ADH activity, CRM level, and RNA level among strains within species at all developmental stages. However, the only consistent differences between the two species are in pupal RNA level and in late-adult activity and CRM level. Late-adult melanogaster flies that are homozygous for the Slow allozyme have approximately twice the level of ADH activity and CRM as do simulans flies. The regression of activity on CRM over strains is highly significant and essentially the same for each species, which means that most, if not all, of the activity difference between the species is due to a difference in concentration of the ADH protein. In contrast, there is no significant regression of CRM level on mRNA level in adults of either species; nor is there a significant difference in RNA level between species. Therefore, the difference in ADH protein concentration is not due to RNA template availability. Thus, the interspecific difference in ADH level in adults must be due either to a difference in the rate of translation of the two RNAs or to a difference in protein stability.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.