Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, S.
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, S.
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 4, 504-513, Copyright © 1987 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Molecular evolution of mammalian class I alcohol dehydrogenase

S Yokoyama and R Yokoyama
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University.

Phylogenetic relationship and the rates of evolution of mammalian alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs) have been studied by using the amino acid sequences from the human (ADH alpha, ADH beta, and ADH gamma), rat, mouse, and horse (ADH E and ADH S). With the maize ADH1 and ADH2 used as references, the patterns of the amino acid replacements in the beta- sheets, alpha-helices, and random coils in each of the catalytic and coenzyme-binding domains were analyzed separately. The phylogenetic trees based on the different sets of amino acid substitutions consistently showed that (1) multiple ADHs in human and horse have arisen after mammalian radiation, (2) the common ancestor of human ADHs alpha and beta diverged from the ancestor of ADH gamma first and the former two ADHs diverged from each other more recently, and (3) the human ADHs are more closely related to the rodent ADHs than to the horse ADHs. Furthermore, the estimated branch lengths showed that the rodent ADHs are evolving faster than the other ADHs. This difference in evolutionary rate between the two groups of organisms is explainable either in terms of the difference in the number of cell generations per year or in terms of reduction of functional constraints.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.