Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 3, 75-83, Copyright © 1986 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Molecular evolution of bacteriophages: evidence of selection against the recognition sites of host restriction enzymes

PM Sharp
Department of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

Restriction enzymes produced by bacteria serve as a defense against invading bacteriophages, and so phages without other protection would be expected to undergo selection to eliminate recognition sites for these enzymes from their genomes. The observed frequencies of all restriction sites in the genomes of all completely sequenced DNA phages (T7, lambda, phi X174, G4, M13, f1, fd, and IKe) have been compared to expected frequencies derived from trinucleotide frequencies. Attention was focused on 6-base palindromes since they comprise the typical recognition sites for type II restriction enzymes. All of these coliphages, with the exception of lambda and G4, exhibit significant avoidance of the particular sequences that are enterobacterial restriction sites. As expected, the sequenced fraction of the genome of phi 29, a Bacillus subtilis phage, lacks Bacillus restriction sites. By contrast, the RNA phage MS2, several viruses that infect eukaryotes (EBV, adenovirus, papilloma, and SV40), and three mitochondrial genomes (human, mouse, and cow) were found not to lack restriction sites. Because the particular palindromes avoided correspond closely with the recognition sites for host enzymes and because other viruses and small genomes do not show this avoidance, it is concluded that the effect indeed results from natural selection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
W. A. M. Loenen
Tracking EcoKI and DNA fifty years on: a golden story full of surprises
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2003; 31(24): 7059 - 7069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
I. Mruk, M. Cichowicz, and T. Kaczorowski
Characterization of the LlaCI methyltransferase from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris W15 provides new insights into the biology of type II restriction-modification systems
Microbiology, November 1, 2003; 149(11): 3331 - 3341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
N. E. Murray
Type I Restriction Systems: Sophisticated Molecular Machines (a Legacy of Bertani and Weigle)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2000; 64(2): 412 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
A. Madsen and J. Josephsen
Cloning and Characterization of the Lactococcal Plasmid-Encoded Type II Restriction/Modification System, LlaDII
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 1998; 64(7): 2424 - 2431.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
E. P.C. Rocha, A. Danchin, and A. Viari
Evolutionary Role of Restriction/Modification Systems as Revealed by Comparative Genome Analysis
Genome Res., June 1, 2001; 11(6): 946 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.