Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on May 12, 2009
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009 26(8):1901-1908; doi:10.1093/molbev/msp102
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/8/1901    most recent
msp102v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sangaralingam, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sangaralingam, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

A Phylogenetic Mixture Model for Gene Family Loss in Parasitic Bacteria

Matthew Spencer and Ajanthah Sangaralingam

School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

m.spencer{at}liverpool.ac.uk.

Accepted for publication May 5, 2009.

Gene families are frequently gained and lost from prokaryotic genomes. It is widely believed that the rate of loss was accelerated for some but not all gene families in lineages that became parasites or endosymbionts. This leads to a form of heterotachy that may be responsible for the poor performance of phylogeny estimation based on gene content. We describe a mixture model that accounts for this heterotachy. We show that this model fits data on the distribution of gene families across bacteria from the COG database much better than previous models. However, it still favors an artifactual tree topology in which parasites form a clade over the more plausible 16S topology. In contrast to a previous model of genome dynamics, our model suggests that the ancestral bacterium had a small genome. We suggest that models of gene family gain and loss are likely to be more useful for understanding genome dynamics than for estimating phylogenetic trees.

Key Words: gene families • mixture model • parasites • maximum likelihood • phylogenetics


Jennifer Wernegreen, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.