Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on March 16, 2009
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009 26(6):1391-1404; doi:10.1093/molbev/msp049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/6/1391    most recent
msp049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cavanaugh, C. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cavanaugh, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Evidence for Homologous Recombination in Intracellular Chemosynthetic Clam Symbionts

Frank J. Stewart*, Curtis R. Young{dagger} and Colleen M. Cavanaugh{dagger}

* Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
{dagger} Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

E-mail: cavanaug{at}fas.harvard.edu.

Accepted for publication March 9, 2009.

Homologous recombination is a fundamental mechanism for the genetic diversification of free-living bacteria. However, recombination may be limited in endosymbiotic bacteria, as these taxa are locked into an intracellular niche and may rarely encounter sources of foreign DNA. This study tested the hypothesis that vertically transmitted endosymbionts of deep-sea clams (Bivalvia: Vesicomyidae) show little or no evidence of recombination. Phylogenetic analysis of 13 loci distributed across the genomes of 14 vesicomyid symbionts revealed multiple, well-supported inconsistencies among gene tree topologies, and maximum likelihood–based tests rejected a hypothesis of shared evolutionary history (linkage) among loci. Further, multiple statistical methods confirmed the presence of recombination by detecting intragenic breakpoints in two symbiont loci. Recombination may be confined to a subset of vesicomyid symbionts, as some clades showed high levels of genomic stability, whereas others showed clear patterns of homologous exchange. Notably, a mosaic genome is present in symB, a symbiont lineage shown to have been acquired laterally (i.e., nonvertically) by Vesicomya sp. JdF clams. The majority of loci analyzed here supported a tight sister clustering of symB with the symbiont of a host species from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, whereas others placed symB in a clade with symA, the dominant phylotype of V. sp. JdF clams. This result raises the hypothesis that lateral symbiont transfer between hosts may facilitate recombination by bringing divergent symbiont lineages into contact. Together, the data show that homologous recombination contributes to the diversification of vesicomyid clam symbionts, despite the intracellular lifestyle of these bacteria.

Key Words: genome evolution • recombination • lateral transmission • chemosynthesis • Calyptogena • hydrothermal vent

Barbara Holland, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
F. J. Stewart, A. H. Y. Baik, and C. M. Cavanaugh
Genetic Subdivision of Chemosynthetic Endosymbionts of Solemya velum along the Southern New England Coast
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 15, 2009; 75(18): 6005 - 6007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.