MBE Advance Access originally published online on January 15, 2009
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009 26(5):957-968; doi:10.1093/molbev/msp002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Gene Cluster Statistics with Gene Families
* Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
E-mail: nraghupa{at}cs.cmu.edu
Accepted for publication November 3, 2008.
Identifying genomic regions that descended from a common ancestor is important for understanding the function and evolution of genomes. In distantly related genomes, clusters of homologous gene pairs are evidence of candidate homologous regions. Demonstrating the statistical significance of such "gene clusters" is an essential component of comparative genomic analyses. However, currently there are no practical statistical tests for gene clusters that model the influence of the number of homologs in each gene family on cluster significance. In this work, we demonstrate empirically that failure to incorporate gene family size in gene cluster statistics results in overestimation of significance, leading to incorrect conclusions. We further present novel analytical methods for estimating gene cluster significance that take gene family size into account. Our methods do not require complete genome data and are suitable for testing individual clusters found in local regions, such as contigs in an unfinished assembly. We consider pairs of regions drawn from the same genome (paralogous clusters), as well as regions drawn from two different genomes (orthologous clusters).
Determining cluster significance under general models of gene family size is computationally intractable. By assuming that all gene families are of equal size, we obtain analytical expressions that allow fast approximation of cluster probabilities. We evaluate the accuracy of this approximation by comparing the resulting gene cluster probabilities with cluster probabilities obtained by simulating a realistic, power-law distributed model of gene family size, with parameters inferred from genomic data. Surprisingly, despite the simplicity of the underlying assumption, our method accurately approximates the true cluster probabilities. It slightly overestimates these probabilities, yielding a conservative test. We present additional simulation results indicating the best choice of parameter values for data analysis in genomes of various sizes and illustrate the utility of our methods by applying them to gene clusters recently reported in the literature. Mathematica code to compute cluster probabilities using our methods is available as supplementary material.
Key Words: gene cluster • gene family • statistical significance • spatial comparative genomics • genome evolution • combinatorics
1 Present address: Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University.