Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on November 25, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009 26(2):451-461; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn272
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
26/2/451    most recent
msn272v2
msn272v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by dos Reis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wernisch, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by dos Reis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wernisch, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Research Articles

Estimating Translational Selection in Eukaryotic Genomes

Mario dos Reis*,{dagger} and Lorenz Wernisch*,{ddagger}

* School of Crystallography, Birkbeck College, London, UK
{dagger} Mathematical Biology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, UK
{ddagger} MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK

E-mail: mdosrei{at}nimr.mrc.ac.uk.

Accepted for publication November 17, 2008.

Natural selection on codon usage is a pervasive force that acts on a large variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Despite this, obtaining reliable estimates of selection on codon usage has proved complicated, perhaps due to the fact that the selection coefficients involved are very small. In this work, a population genetics model is used to measure the strength of selected codon usage bias, S, in 10 eukaryotic genomes. It is shown that the strength of selection is closely linked to expression and that reliable estimates of selection coefficients can only be obtained for genes with very similar expression levels. We compare the strength of selected codon usage for orthologous genes across all 10 genomes classified according to expression categories. Fungi genomes present the largest S values (2.24–2.56), whereas multicellular invertebrate and plant genomes present more moderate values (0.61–1.91). The large mammalian genomes (human and mouse) show low S values (0.22–0.51) for the most highly expressed genes. This might not be evidence for selection in these organisms as the technique used here to estimate S does not properly account for nucleotide composition heterogeneity along such genomes. The relationship between estimated S values and empirical estimates of population size is presented here for the first time. It is shown, as theoretically expected, that population size has an important role in the operativity of translational selection.

Key Words: translational selection • tAI • tRNA • codon usage bias • population size • eukaryotes


Manolo Gouy, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. D. Cutter, A. Dey, and R. L. Murray
Evolution of the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2009; 26(6): 1199 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
Y. Hiraoka, K. Kawamata, T. Haraguchi, and Y. Chikashige
Codon usage bias is correlated with gene expression levels in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Genes Cells, April 1, 2009; 14(4): 499 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.