MBE Advance Access originally published online on January 29, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(4):778-786; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn024
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Divergence Times in Caenorhabditis and Drosophila Inferred from Direct Estimates of the Neutral Mutation Rate
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the Centre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
E-mail: asher.cutter{at}utoronto.ca.
Accepted for publication January 21, 2008.
Accurate inference of the dates of common ancestry among species forms a central problem in understanding the evolutionary history of organisms. Molecular estimates of divergence time rely on the molecular evolutionary prediction that neutral mutations and substitutions occur at the same constant rate in genomes of related species. This underlies the notion of a molecular clock. Most implementations of this idea depend on paleontological calibration to infer dates of common ancestry, but taxa with poor fossil records must rely on external, potentially inappropriate, calibration with distantly related species. The classic biological models Caenorhabditis and Drosophila are examples of such problem taxa. Here, I illustrate internal calibration in these groups with direct estimates of the mutation rate from contemporary populations that are corrected for interfering effects of selection on the assumption of neutrality of substitutions. Divergence times are inferred among 6 species each of Caenorhabditis and Drosophila, based on thousands of orthologous groups of genes. I propose that the 2 closest known species of Caenorhabditis shared a common ancestor <24 MYA (Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis sp. 5) and that Caenorhabditis elegans diverged from its closest known relatives <30 MYA, assuming that these species pass through at least 6 generations per year; these estimates are much more recent than reported previously with molecular clock calibrations from non-nematode phyla. Dates inferred for the common ancestor of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans are roughly concordant with previous studies. These revised dates have important implications for rates of genome evolution and the origin of self-fertilization in Caenorhabditis.
Key Words: divergence time • Caenorhabditis • Drosophila • molecular evolution
John H. McDonald, Associate Editor
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. H. Thomas Genome evolution in Caenorhabditis Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, June 23, 2008; (2008) eln022v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. D. Cutter, J. D. Wasmuth, and N. L. Washington Patterns of Molecular Evolution in Caenorhabditis Preclude Ancient Origins of Selfing Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2093 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|