MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 5, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(12):2525-2535; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn169
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Quantifying the Stationarity and Time Reversibility of the Nucleotide Substitution Process
Department of Computational Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
E-mail: squartin{at}molgen.mpg.de.
Accepted for publication July 27, 2008.
Markov models describing the evolution of the nucleotide substitution process, widely used in phylogeny reconstruction, usually assume the hypotheses of stationarity and time reversibility. Although these models give meaningful results when applied to biological data, it is not clear if the 2 assumptions mentioned above hold and, if not, how much sequence evolution processes deviate from them. To this aim, we introduce 2 sets of indices that can be calculated from the nucleotide distribution and the substitution rates. The stationarity indices (STIs) can be used to test the validity of the equilibrium assumption. The irreversibility indices (IRIs) are derived from the Kolmogorov cycle conditions for time reversibility and quantify the degree of nontime reversibility of a process. We have computed STIs and IRIs for the evolutionary process of 2 lineages, Drosophila simulans and Homo sapiens. In the latter case, we use a modified form of the indices that takes into account the CpG decay process. In both cases, we find statistically significant deviations from the ideal case of a process that has reached stationarity and is time reversible.
Key Words: Markov models of nucleotide substitutions stationarity time reversibility maximum likelihood estimation CpG effect
Peter Lockhart, Associate Editor
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Polak and P. F. Arndt Long-Range Bidirectional Strand Asymmetries Originate at CpG Islands in the Human Genome Gen Biol Evol, August 6, 2009; 2009(0): 189 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schneider and G. M. Cannarozzi Support Patterns from Different Outgroups Provide a Strong Phylogenetic Signal Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2009; 26(6): 1259 - 1272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

