MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(11):2445-2455; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn187
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Multiple Paleopolyploidizations during the Evolution of the Compositae Reveal Parallel Patterns of Duplicate Gene Retention after Millions of Years







* Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Department of Biology and Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University
Genome Center and Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis
Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, The University of Georgia
E-mail: msbarker{at}indiana.edu.
Accepted for publication August 22, 2008.
Of the approximately 250,000 species of flowering plants, nearly one in ten are members of the Compositae (Asteraceae), a diverse family found in almost every habitat on all continents except Antarctica. With an origin in the mid Eocene, the Compositae is also a relatively young family with remarkable diversifications during the last 40 My. Previous cytologic and systematic investigations suggested that paleopolyploidy may have occurred in at least one Compositae lineage, but a recent analysis of genomic data was equivocal. We tested for evidence of paleopolyploidy in the evolutionary history of the family using recently available expressed sequence tag (EST) data from the Compositae Genome Project. Combined with data available on GenBank, we analyzed nearly 1 million ESTs from 18 species representing seven genera and four tribes. Our analyses revealed at least three ancient whole-genome duplications in the Compositae—a paleopolyploidization shared by all analyzed taxa and placed near the origin of the family just prior to the rapid radiation of its tribes and independent genome duplications near the base of the tribes Mutisieae and Heliantheae. These results are consistent with previous research implicating paleopolyploidy in the evolution and diversification of the Heliantheae. Further, we observed parallel retention of duplicate genes from the basal Compositae genome duplication across all tribes, despite divergence times of 33–38 My among these lineages. This pattern of retention was also repeated for the paleologs from the Heliantheae duplication. Intriguingly, the categories of genes retained in duplicate were substantially different from those in Arabidopsis. In particular, we found that genes annotated to structural components or cellular organization Gene Ontology categories were significantly enriched among paleologs, whereas genes associated with transcription and other regulatory functions were significantly underrepresented. Our results suggest that paleopolyploidy can yield strikingly consistent signatures of gene retention in plant genomes despite extensive lineage radiations and recurrent genome duplications but that these patterns vary substantially among higher taxonomic categories.
Key Words: paleopolyploidy whole-genome duplication genome evolution duplicate gene retention Asteraceae Compositae
Kenneth Wolfe, Associate Editor
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Mayrose, M. S. Barker, and S. P. Otto Probabilistic Models of Chromosome Number Evolution and the Inference of Polyploidy Syst Biol, January 6, 2010; (2010) syp083v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Broholm, E. Pollanen, S. Ruokolainen, S. Tahtiharju, M. Kotilainen, V. A. Albert, P. Elomaa, and T. H. Teeri Functional characterization of B class MADS-box transcription factors in Gerbera hybrida J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2010; 61(1): 75 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Barker, H. Vogel, and M. E. Schranz Paleopolyploidy in the Brassicales: Analyses of the Cleome Transcriptome Elucidate the History of Genome Duplications in Arabidopsis and Other Brassicales Gen Biol Evol, November 3, 2009; 2009(0): 391 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Heesacker, E. Bachlava, R. L. Brunick, J. M. Burke, L. H. Rieseberg, and S. J. Knapp Karyotypic Evolution of the Common and Silverleaf Sunflower Genomes The Plant Genome, November 1, 2009; 2(3): 233 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shan, L. Zahn, S. Guindon, P. K. Wall, H. Kong, H. Ma, C. W. dePamphilis, and J. Leebens-Mack Evolution of Plant MADS Box Transcription Factors: Evidence for Shifts in Selection Associated with Early Angiosperm Diversification and Concerted Gene Duplications Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2009; 26(10): 2229 - 2244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Hahn Distinguishing Among Evolutionary Models for the Maintenance of Gene Duplicates J. Hered., September 1, 2009; 100(5): 605 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Fawcett, S. Maere, and Y. Van de Peer From the Cover: Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event PNAS, April 7, 2009; 106(14): 5737 - 5742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Soltis and J. G. Burleigh Surviving the K-T mass extinction: New perspectives of polyploidization in angiosperms PNAS, April 7, 2009; 106(14): 5455 - 5456. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Barker, K. M. Dlugosch, A. C. C. Reddy, S. N. Amyotte, and L. H. Rieseberg SCARF: maximizing next-generation EST assemblies for evolutionary and population genomic analyses Bioinformatics, February 15, 2009; 25(4): 535 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







