Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on October 16, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(1):83-91; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm229
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/1/83    most recent
msm229v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bapteste, E.
Right arrow Articles by Doolittle, W.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bapteste, E.
Right arrow Articles by Doolittle, W.F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Alternative Methods for Concatenation of Core Genes Indicate a Lack of Resolution in Deep Nodes of the Prokaryotic Phylogeny

E. Bapteste*,1,2, E. Susko{dagger},2, J. Leigh*, I. Ruiz-Trillo*, J. Bucknam* and W.F. Doolittle*

* Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and Genome Atlantic, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
{dagger} Genome Atlantic, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

E-mail: eric.bapteste{at}snv.jussieu.fr.

Accepted for publication October 11, 2007.

It has recently been proposed that a well-resolved Tree of Life can be achieved through concatenation of shared genes. There are, however, several difficulties with such an approach, especially in the prokaryotic part of this tree. We tackled some of them using a new combination of maximum likelihood-based methods, developed in order to practice as safe and careful concatenations as possible. First, we used the application concaterpillar on carefully aligned core genes. This application uses a hierarchical likelihood-ratio test framework to assess both the topological congruence between gene phylogenies (i.e., whether different genes share the same evolutionary history) and branch-length congruence (i.e., whether genes that share the same history share the same pattern of relative evolutionary rates). We thus tested if these core genes can be concatenated or should be instead categorized into different incongruent sets. Second, we developed a heat map approach studying the evolution of the phylogenetic support for different bipartitions, when the number of sites of different phylogenetic quality in the concatenation increases. These heatmaps allow us to follow which phylogenetic signals increase or decrease as the concatenation progresses and to detect emerging artifactual groupings, that is, groups that are more and more supported when more and more homoplasic sites are thrown in the analysis. We showed that, as far as 7 major prokaryotic lineages are concerned, only 22 core genes can be said to be congruent and can be safely concatenated. This number is even smaller than the number of genes retained to reconstruct a "Tree of One Per Cent." Furthermore, the concatenation of these 22 markers leads to an unresolved tree as the only groupings in the concatenation tree seem to reflect emerging artifacts. Using concatenated core genes as a valid framework to classify uncharacterized environmental sequences can thus be misleading.

Key Words: phylogeny • concatenation • simultaneous analysis • Tree of Life • prokaryotes


1 Present address: UPMC UMR 7138, 7 quai Saint-Bernard, Bâtiment A, 4ème étage, 75005 Paris, France.

2 E.B. and E.S. contributed equally to this article.

William Martin, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.