Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on July 13, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(9):2029-2039; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm139
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/9/2029    most recent
msm139v3
msm139v2
msm139v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, W.
Right arrow Articles by Penny, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, W.
Right arrow Articles by Penny, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Treeness Triangles: Visualizing the Loss of Phylogenetic Signal

WT White*,1, SF Hills*,1, R Gaddam*,1, BR Holland* and David Penny*

* Allan Wilson Center for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

E-mail: D.Penny{at}massey.ac.nz.

Accepted for publication June 22, 2007.

It is well known that molecular data "saturates" with increasing sequence divergence (thereby losing phylogenetic information) and that in addition the accumulation of misleading information due to chance similarities or to systematic bias may accompany saturation as well. Exploratory data analysis methods that can quantify the extent of signal loss or convergence for a given data set are scarce. Such methods are needed because genomics delivers very long sequence alignments spanning substantial phylogenetic depth, where site saturation may be compounded by systematic biases or other alternative signals. Here we introduce the Treeness Triangle (TT) graph, in which signals detectable by Hadamard (spectral) analysis are summed into 3 categories—those supporting 1) external and 2) internal branches in the optimal tree, in addition to 3) the residuals (potential internal branches not present in the optimal tree). These 3 values are plotted in a standard ternary coordinate system. The approach is illustrated with simulated and real data sets, the latter from complete chloroplast genomes, where potential problems of paralogy or lateral gene acquisition can be excluded. The TT uncovers the divergence-dependent loss of phylogenetic signal as subsets of chloroplast genomes are investigated that span increasingly deeper evolutionary timescales. The rate of signal loss (or signal retention) varies with the gene and/or the method of analysis.

Key Words: plastid genomes • spectral analysis • model misspecification • exploratory data analysis • ternary plot • Hadamard conjugation


1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Jianzhi Zhang, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
O. Deusch, G. Landan, M. Roettger, N. Gruenheit, K. V. Kowallik, J. F. Allen, W. Martin, and T. Dagan
Genes of Cyanobacterial Origin in Plant Nuclear Genomes Point to a Heterocyst-Forming Plastid Ancestor
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2008; 25(4): 748 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. Penny, W. T. White, M. D. Hendy, and M. J. Phillips
A Bias in ML Estimates of Branch Lengths in the Presence of Multiple Signals
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 239 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.