Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on June 24, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(9):1971-1981; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm125
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/9/1971    most recent
msm125v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Computational Analysis of RNA Editing Sites in Plant Mitochondrial Genomes Reveals Similar Information Content and a Sporadic Distribution of Editing Sites

R. Michael Mulligan*, Kenneth L. C. Chang{dagger},1 and Chia Ching Chou{dagger},1

* Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine
{dagger} Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine

E-mail: rmmullig{at}uci.edu.

Accepted for publication June 18, 2007.

A computational analysis of RNA editing sites was performed on protein-coding sequences of plant mitochondrial genomes from Arabidopsis thaliana, Beta vulgaris, Brassica napus, and Oryza sativa. The distribution of nucleotides around edited and unedited cytidines was compared in 41 nucleotide segments and included 1481 edited cytidines and 21,390 unedited cytidines in the 4 genomes. The distribution of nucleotides was examined in 1, 2, and 3 nucleotide windows by comparison of nucleotide frequency ratios and relative entropy. The relative entropy analyses indicate that information is encoded in the nucleotide sequences in the 5 prime flank (–18 to –14, –13 to –10, –6 to –4, –2/–1) and the immediate 3 prime flanking nucleotide (+1), and these regions may be important in editing site recognition. The relative entropy was large when 2 or 3 nucleotide windows were analyzed, suggesting that several contiguous nucleotides may be involved in editing site recognition. RNA editing sites were frequently preceded by 2 pyrimidines or AU and followed by a guanidine (HYCG) in the monocot and dicot mitochondrial genomes, and rarely preceded by 2 purines. Analysis of chloroplast editing sites from a dicot, Nicotiana tabacum, and a monocot, Zea mays, revealed a similar distribution of nucleotides around editing sites (HYCA). The similarity of this motif around editing sites in monocots and dicots in both mitochondria and chloroplasts suggests that a mechanistic basis for this motif exists that is common in these different organelle and phylogenetic systems. The preferred sequence distribution around RNA editing sites may have an important impact on the acquisition of editing sites in evolution because the immediate sequence context of a cytidine residue may render a cytidine editable or uneditable, and consequently determine whether a T to C mutation at a specific position may be corrected by RNA editing. The distribution of editing sites in many protein-coding sequences is shown to be non-random with editing sites clustered in groups separated by regions with no editing sites. The sporadic distribution of editing sites could result from a mechanism of editing site loss by gene conversion utilizing edited sequence information, possibly through an edited cDNA intermediate.

Key Words: RNA editing • relative entropy • gene conversion • copy correction • non-random distribution • evolution of editing • editing site recognition • retroconversion • gene transfer


1 These 2 authors contributed equally to the manuscript

Franz Lang, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RNAHome page
Y. Yang, J. Lv, B. Gui, H. Yin, X. Wu, Y. Zhang, and Y. Jin
A-to-I RNA editing alters less-conserved residues of highly conserved coding regions: Implications for dual functions in evolution
RNA, August 1, 2008; 14(8): 1516 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S.-M. Chaw, A. Chun-Chieh Shih, D. Wang, Y.-W. Wu, S.-M. Liu, and T.-Y. Chou
The Mitochondrial Genome of the Gymnosperm Cycas taitungensis Contains a Novel Family of Short Interspersed Elements, Bpu Sequences, and Abundant RNA Editing Sites
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 603 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. P. Mower
Modeling Sites of RNA Editing as a Fifth Nucleotide State Reveals Progressive Loss of Edited Sites from Angiosperm Mitochondria
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 52 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.