Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on May 9, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(8):1744-1751; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm093
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/8/1744    most recent
msm093v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neafsey, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Galagan, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neafsey, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Galagan, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Dual Modes of Natural Selection on Upstream Open Reading Frames

Daniel E. Neafsey and James E. Galagan

Microbial Analysis Group, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts

E-mail: neafsey{at}broad.mit.edu.

Accepted for publication May 7, 2007.

Upstream open reading frames (uORFs) are common features of eukaryotic genes, occurring in 10%–25% of 5' leader sequences. Upstream ORFs that have been subjected to experimental analysis have been generally found to decrease translational efficiency of the downstream coding sequence. Previous investigations of uORFs in mammals and yeast have detected uORFs conserved over long evolutionary distances, prompting speculation about the nature and cause of the natural selection underlying such conservation. We have analyzed uORFs in the basidiomycetous fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans to discern the properties of this purifying selection. We find that uORFs in the Cryptococcus species complex are conserved at twice the expected rate, and we report 122 uORFs that are conserved among all four sequenced Cryptococcus strains. A significantly greater proportion of uORF losses occur via direct mutation to the uORF start codon than expected. This observation suggests that mutational disruption of a uORF that leaves the start codon intact may be selectively disadvantageous, perhaps because of the risk of premature translation initiation. Accounting for this constrained mode of loss and comparing the relative conservation of uORFs between the 5' leader and control sequences enables us to calculate that at least a third of uORFs may be conserved for their effects on translational efficiency. The remaining fraction may be conserved either by chance or as a result of selective pressure to prevent premature translation initiation from the uORF start codon. We find that the majority of conserved uORFs do not exhibit codon usage bias or conservation at the amino acid level, and therefore they do not likely encode bioactive peptides. Our analysis suggests that uORFs are an important and underappreciated mechanism of post-transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes.

Key Words: uORF • uAUG • conservation • translation • Cryptococcus


Laura Katz, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. S. Hughes, C. O. Buckley, and D. E. Neafsey
Complex Selection on Intron Size in Cryptococcus neoformans
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Puyaubert, L. Denis, and C. Alban
Dual Targeting of Arabidopsis HOLOCARBOXYLASE SYNTHETASE1: A Small Upstream Open Reading Frame Regulates Translation Initiation and Protein Targeting
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2008; 146(2): 478 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.