MBE Advance Access originally published online on April 29, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(8):1667-1677; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm085
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Population Genetics Without Intraspecific Data




* Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Institute for Advanced Study, Berlin, Germany
Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University
Bioinformatics Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
|| Laboratory of Biometrics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
E-mail: thorne{at}statgen.ncsu.edu.
Accepted for publication April 18, 2007.
A central goal of computational biology is the prediction of phenotype from DNA and protein sequence data. Recent models of sequence change use in silico prediction systems to incorporate the effects of phenotype on evolutionary rates. These models have been designed for analyzing sequence data from different species and have been accompanied by statistical techniques for estimating model parameters when the incorporation of phenotype induces dependent change among sequence positions. A difficulty with these efforts to link phenotype and interspecific evolution is that evolution occurs within populations, and parameters of interspecific models should have population genetic interpretations. We show, with two examples, how population genetic interpretations can be assigned to evolutionary models. The first example considers the impact of RNA secondary structure on sequence change, and the second reflects the tendency for protein tertiary structure to influence nonsynonymous substitution rates. We argue that statistical fit to data should not be the sole criterion for assessing models of sequence change. A good interspecific model should also yield a clear and biologically plausible population genetic interpretation.
Key Words: dependence among sites fixation probability protein structure RNA structure
Ziheng Yang, Associate Editor
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Rodrigue, C. L. Kleinman, H. Philippe, and N. Lartillot Computational Methods for Evaluating Phylogenetic Models of Coding Sequence Evolution with Dependence between Codons Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1663 - 1676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Moses and R. Durbin Inferring Selection on Amino Acid Preference in Protein Domains Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2009; 26(3): 527 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Anisimova and C. Kosiol Investigating Protein-Coding Sequence Evolution with Probabilistic Codon Substitution Models Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2009; 26(2): 255 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Delport, K. Scheffler, and C. Seoighe Models of coding sequence evolution Brief Bioinform, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 97 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Choi, B. D Redelings, and J. L Thorne Basing population genetic inferences and models of molecular evolution upon desired stationary distributions of DNA or protein sequences Phil Trans R Soc B, December 27, 2008; 363(1512): 3931 - 3939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Rodrigue, N. Lartillot, and H. Philippe Bayesian Comparisons of Codon Substitution Models Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1579 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yang and R. Nielsen Mutation-Selection Models of Codon Substitution and Their Use to Estimate Selective Strengths on Codon Usage Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 568 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



