MBE Advance Access originally published online on May 24, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(8):1604-1607; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm105
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letters |
Rare Coding Sequence Changes are Consistent with Ecdysozoa, not Coelomata




,
Departament de Genètica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Evolution and Ecology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
E-mail: royscott{at}ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Accepted for publication May 21, 2007.
There is growing interest in the use of alternative, more slowly-evolving RGCs (rare genomic changes). Recently, Rogozin and coauthors (Rogozin et al. 2007) proposed a novel phylogenetic method employing rare amino acid changes, RGC-CAMs (rare genomic changes-conserved amino acids-multiple substitutions). They applied their method to 694 sets of eukaryotic orthologs in order to distinguish the relationship between nematodes, arthropods and deuterostomes. They concluded that such rare amino acid changes were consistent with the Coelomata hypothesis, which groups arthropods and deuterostomes to the exclusion of nematodes. Here we use newly available genomic sequences from Nematostella vectensis, a basal metazoan, and from Brugia malayi, an additional nematode. We show that the apparent support for Coelomata is likely to be the result of the rapid rate of evolution leading to Caenorhabditis nematodes. Including the additional species paints a very different picture, with 13 remaining characters consistent with Ecdysozoa versus only 1 consistent with Coelomata.
Key Words: Ecdysozoa Coelomata phylogeny long branches rare genomic changes
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Herve Philippe, Associate Editor
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. B. Rogozin, M. K. Basu, M. Csuros, and E. V. Koonin Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont-Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes Gen Biol Evol, June 22, 2009; 2009(0): 99 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lartillot and H. Philippe Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1463 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A Jenner and D.T. J Littlewood Problematica old and new Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1503 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Telford, S. J Bourlat, A. Economou, D. Papillon, and O. Rota-Stabelli The evolution of the Ecdysozoa Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1529 - 1537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and M. Irimia Rare Genomic Characters Do Not Support Coelomata: Intron Loss/Gain Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2008; 25(4): 620 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Irimia and S. W. Roy Spliceosomal introns as tools for genomic and evolutionary analysis Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2008; 36(5): 1703 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, L. Carmel, and E. V. Koonin Analysis of Rare Amino Acid Replacements Supports the Coelomata Clade Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2594 - 2597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zheng, I. B. Rogozin, E. V. Koonin, and T. M. Przytycka Support for the Coelomata Clade of Animals from a Rigorous Analysis of the Pattern of Intron Conservation Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2583 - 2592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



