Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on January 22, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(4):896-899; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/4/896    most recent
msm010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scofield, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lynch, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scofield, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lynch, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Letters

Position of the Final Intron in Full-Length Transcripts: Determined by NMD?

Douglas G. Scofield, Xin Hong and Michael Lynch

Department of Biology, Indiana University

E-mail: dgscofie{at}indiana.edu.

Accepted for publication January 18, 2007.

Nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathways for detection and degradation of transcripts containing premature termination (stop) codons (PTCs) are ubiquitous among the eukaryotes. NMD uses the presence of a second signal downstream of a termination codon to distinguish a PTC from a true stop codon. In mammals and perhaps other eukaryotes, the second signal is a protein complex closely associated with exon–exon junctions formed after removal of spliceosomal introns. A valid transcript in such species must have its 3'-most intron positioned so as not to serve as a second signal relative to the true stop. This requirement has been termed the "55-bp rule", in reference to the position within the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) of valid transcripts downstream of which introns should not be found. However, as more information has become available, it is apparent that the 55-bp rule still holds in species with NMD pathways, which are not intron dependent. To clarify the applicability of the 55-bp rule, we constructed a large database of 3'-most intron positions within full-length transcripts from 4 eukaryotes, 2 of which (human and mouse) use intron positions for NMD, 1 of which (Drosophila melanogaster) does not, and 1 of which (Arabidopsis thaliana) may not use intron positions. Surprisingly, we found intron numbers to be sharply reduced within 3' UTRs in comparison to coding sequences starting immediately downstream of true stop, rather than 55 bp; this strong threshold existed for all 4 species. We suggest that a more general mechanism—higher rates of intron inclusion within 3' UTRs—is better able to explain this threshold. We propose that 3' UTRs are better able to tolerate loss of intron integrity than other gene regions, due to the generally greater length of conserved sequences important within 3' UTR exons. This mechanism may also help to explain the roughly 3 times greater length of 3' UTRs in comparison to 5' UTRs.

Key Words: intron • nonsense-mediated decay • 3' UTR • 55-bp rule • premature termination codon • intron inclusion


Kenneth Wolfe, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
O. Isken and L. E. Maquat
Quality control of eukaryotic mRNA: safeguarding cells from abnormal mRNA function
Genes & Dev., August 1, 2007; 21(15): 1833 - 3856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.