MBE Advance Access originally published online on July 23, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(10):2222-2234; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm150
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Purifying Selection Maintains Highly Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Drosophila
* Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
E-mail: casey.bergman{at}manchester.ac.uk.
Accepted for publication July 16, 2007.
The majority of metazoan genomes consist of nonprotein-coding regions, although the functional significance of most noncoding DNA sequences remains unknown. Highly conserved noncoding sequences (CNSs) have proven to be reliable indicators of functionally constrained sequences such as cis-regulatory elements and noncoding RNA genes. However, CNSs may arise from nonselective evolutionary processes such as genomic regions with extremely low mutation rates known as mutation "cold spots." Here we combine comparative genomic data from recently completed insect genome projects with population genetic data in Drosophila melanogaster to test predictions of the mutational cold spot model of CNS evolution in the genus Drosophila. We find that point mutations in intronic and intergenic CNSs exhibit a significant reduction in levels of divergence relative to levels of polymorphism, as well as a significant excess of rare derived alleles, compared with either the nonconserved spacer regions between CNSs or with 4-fold silent sites in coding regions. Controlling for the effects of purifying selection, we find no evidence of positive selection acting on Drosophila CNSs, although we do find evidence for the action of recurrent positive selection in the spacer regions between CNSs. We estimate that 
85% of sites in Drosophila CNSs are under constraint with selection coefficients (Nes) on the order of 10–100, and thus, the estimated strength and number of sites under purifying selection is greater for Drosophila CNSs relative to those in the human genome. These patterns of nonneutral molecular evolution are incompatible with the mutational cold spot hypothesis to explain the existence of CNSs in Drosophila and, coupled with similar findings in mammals, argue against the general likelihood that CNSs are generated by mutational cold spots in any metazoan genome.
Key Words: noncoding DNA • comparative genomics • mutation • constraint • adaptation • Drosophila
William Martin, Associate Editor
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Egea, S. Casillas, and A. Barbadilla Standard and generalized McDonald-Kreitman test: a website to detect selection by comparing different classes of DNA sites Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(suppl_2): W157 - W162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. F. Soria-Hernanz, J. M. Braverman, and M. B. Hamilton Parallel Rate Heterogeneity in Chloroplast and Mitochondrial Genomes of Brazil Nut Trees (Lecythidaceae) Is Consistent with Lineage Effects Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1282 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Beisswanger and W. Stephan Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5447 - 5452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|