Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on October 31, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(1):338-347; doi:10.1093/molbev/msl164
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/1/338    most recent
msl164v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Ellegren, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Ellegren, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Insertion Events of CR1 Retrotransposable Elements Elucidate the Phylogenetic Branching Order in Galliform Birds

Vera B. Kaiser*, Marcel van Tuinen{dagger} and Hans Ellegren*

* Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen, Uppsala, Sweden
{dagger} Department of Ornithology and Mammalogy, California Academy of Sciences

E-mail: hans.ellegren{at}ebc.uu.se.

Accepted for publication October 24, 2006.

Using standard phylogenetic methods, it can be hard to resolve the order in which speciation events took place when new lineages evolved in the distant past and within a short time frame. As an example, phylogenies of galliform birds (including well-known species such as chicken, turkey, and quail) usually show low bootstrap support values at short internal branches, reflecting the rapid diversification of these birds in the Eocene. However, given the key role of chicken and related poultry species in agricultural, evolutionary, general biological and disease studies, it is important to know their internal relationships. Recently, insertion patterns of transposable elements such as long and short interspersed nuclear element markers have proved powerful in revealing branching orders of difficult phylogenies.

Here we decipher the order of speciation events in a group of 27 galliform species based on insertion events of chicken repeat 1 (CR1) transposable elements. Forty-four CR1 marker loci were identified from the draft sequence of the chicken genome, and from turkey BAC clone sequence, and the presence or absence of markers across species was investigated via electrophoretic size separation of amplification products and subsequent confirmation by DNA sequencing. Thirty markers proved possible to type with electrophoresis of which 20 were phylogenetically informative. The distribution of these repeat elements supported a single homoplasy-free cladogram, which confirmed that megapodes, cracids, New World quail, and guinea fowl form outgroups to Phasianidae and that quails, pheasants, and partridges are each polyphyletic groups. Importantly, we show that chicken is an outgroup to turkey and quail, an observation which does not have significant support from previous DNA sequence– and DNA-DNA hybridization–based trees and has important implications for evolutionary studies based on sequence or karyotype data from galliforms. We discuss the potential and limitations of using a genome-based retrotransposon approach in resolving problematic phylogenies among birds.

Key Words: retrotransposon • cladogram • phylogenetics • birds • genomics


Scott Edwards, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.