MBE Advance Access originally published online on February 22, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(5):973-980; doi:10.1093/molbev/msj112
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005 |
Genome-Wide Associations Between Hybrid Sterility QTL and Marker Transmission Ratio Distortion
* Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis; and Tomato Genetics Resource Center, University of California, Davis
E-mail: lmoyle{at}indiana.edu.
Marker transmission ratio distortion (TRD) in genetic mapping populations is frequently ascribed to selection against allelic combinations that cause hybrid incompatibility. Accordingly, genomic regions of TRD should be nonrandomly associated (colocated) with loci that underlie hybrid incompatibility. To directly test this hypothesis, we evaluated the genome-wide qualitative and quantitative agreement between chromosomal regions exhibiting marker TRD and those known to contain hybrid incompatibility quantitative trait locus (QTL). Incompatibility data came from a near-isogenic line (NIL) analysis of pollen and seed sterility in a cross between two Solanum (formerly Lycopersicon) species. We assessed (1) whether these incompatibility loci are colocated with markers that show significant TRD in two earlier generations preceding these introgression lines and (2) whether the magnitude of marker distortion quantitatively matches the estimated strength of selection against each incompatibility locus. We found evidence that TRD regions are chromosomally colocated with hybrid incompatibility loci more frequently than is expected by chance: pollen sterility QTLs were most closely associated with distorted heterozygote frequencies in later-generation backcrosses. Nonetheless, there was no evidence for an association between TRD and seed sterility and little evidence of a quantitative association between the magnitude of marker TRD and the fitness effects of heterospecific alleles at each chromosomal location. We propose and test a model (the "dance partner" model) to explain several cases where regions of TRD are not associated with hybrid incompatibility loci. Under this model, some NILs containing greater than one heterospecific introgression may not express hybrid incompatibility phenotypes because they carry both appropriate genetic dance partners required for a fully functional interaction. Accordingly, negative interactions expressed in earlier backcross generations are masked in these double-introgression NILs. Based on this model, we identify the location of several new putative pairwise interactors underlying hybrid incompatibility in this species cross.
Key Words: hybrid incompatibility • segregation • marker distortion • speciation • QTL mapping • NIL • Lycopersicon
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. C. Moyle and T. Nakazato Comparative Genetics of Hybrid Incompatibility: Sterility in Two Solanum Species Crosses Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1437 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Niehuis, A. K. Judson, and J. Gadau Cytonuclear Genic Incompatibilities Cause Increased Mortality in Male F2 Hybrids of Nasonia giraulti and N. vitripennis Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 413 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. C. Moyle Comparative Genetics of Potential Prezygotic and Postzygotic Isolating Barriers in a Lycopersicon Species Cross J. Hered., March 1, 2007; 98(2): 123 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|