MBE Advance Access originally published online on November 9, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(3):523-529; doi:10.1093/molbev/msj053
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
No Evidence for Tissue-Specific Adaptation of Synonymous Codon Usage in Humans
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (UMR 5558), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
E-mail: duret{at}biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr.
It has been proposed that the synonymous codon usage of human tissue-specific genes was under selective pressure to modulate the expression of proteins by codon-mediated translational control (Plotkin, J. B., H. Robins, and A. J. Levine. 2004. Tissue-specific codon usage and the expression of human genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:1258812591.) To test this model, we analyzed by internal correspondence analysis the codon usage of 2,126 human tissue-specific genes expressed in 18 different tissues. We confirm that synonymous codon usage differs significantly between the tissues. However, the effect is very weak: the variability of synonymous codon usage between tissues represents only 2.3% of the total codon usage variability. Moreover, this variability is directly linked to isochore-scale (>100 kb) variability of GC-content that affect both coding and introns or intergenic regions. This demonstrates that variations of synonymous codon usage between tissue-specific genes expressed in different tissues are due to regional variations of substitution patterns and not to translational selection.
Key Words: codon usage tissue specific expression GC-content multivariate analysis correspondence analysis