MBE Advance Access originally published online on September 15, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(12):2392-2404; doi:10.1093/molbev/msl111
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Intron Size, Abundance, and Distribution within Untranslated Regions of Genes
Department of Biology, Indiana University
E-mail: dgscofie{at}indiana.edu.
Most research concerning the evolution of introns has largely considered introns within coding sequences (CDSs), without regard for introns located within untranslated regions (UTRs) of genes. Here, we directly determined intron size, abundance, and distribution in UTRs of genes using full-length cDNA libraries and complete genome sequences for four species, Arabidopsis thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster, human, and mouse. Overall intron occupancy (introns/exon kbp) is lower in 5' UTRs than CDSs, but intron density (intron occupancy in regions containing introns) tends to be higher in 5' UTRs than in CDSs. Introns in 5' UTRs are roughly twice as large as introns in CDSs, and there is a sharp drop in intron size at the 5' UTR-CDS boundary. We propose a mechanistic explanation for the existence of selection for larger intron size in 5' UTRs, and outline several implications of this hypothesis. We found introns to be randomly distributed within 5' UTRs, so long as a minimum required exon size was assumed. Introns in 3' UTRs were much less abundant than in 5' UTRs. Though this was expected for human and mouse that have intron-dependent nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathways that discourage the presence of introns within the 3' UTR, it was also true for A. thaliana and D. melanogaster, which may lack intron-dependent NMD. Our findings have several implications for theories of intron evolution and genome evolution in general.
Key Words: untranslated region intron genome evolution
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. Hughes, C. O. Buckley, and D. E. Neafsey Complex Selection on Intron Size in Cryptococcus neoformans Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 247 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gitelman Evolution of the vertebrate twist family and synfunctionalization: a mechanism for differential gene loss through merging of expression domains Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 1912 - 1925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Isken and L. E. Maquat Quality control of eukaryotic mRNA: safeguarding cells from abnormal mRNA function Genes & Dev., August 1, 2007; 21(15): 1833 - 3856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy, D. Penny, and D. E. Neafsey Evolutionary Conservation of UTR Intron Boundaries in Cryptococcus Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2007; 24(5): 1140 - 1148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Scofield, X. Hong, and M. Lynch Position of the Final Intron in Full-Length Transcripts: Determined by NMD? Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 896 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

