MBE Advance Access originally published online on September 18, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(12):2279-2282; doi:10.1093/molbev/msl122
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letters |
On the Varied Pattern of Evolution of 2 Fungal Genomes: A Critique of Hughes and Friedman
Department of Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
E-mail: z.yang{at}ucl.ac.uk.
A number of statistical tests have been proposed to detect positive Darwinian selection affecting a few amino acid sites in a protein, exemplified by an excess of nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. These tests are often more powerful than pairwise sequence comparison, which averages synonymous (dS) and nonsynonymous (dN) rates over the whole gene. In a recent study, however, Hughes AL and Friedman R (2005. Variation in the pattern of synonymous and nonsynonymous difference between two fungal genomes. Mol Bio Evol. 22: 1320–1324) argue that dS and dN are expected to fluctuate along the sequence by chance and that an excess of nonsynonymous differences in individual codons is no evidence for positive selection. The authors compared codons in protein-coding genes from the genomes of 2 yeast species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus. They calculated the proportions of synonymous and nonsynonymous differences per site (pS and pN) in every codon and discovered that pN is often greater than pS and that among some codons pS and pN are negatively correlated. The authors argued that these results invalidate previous tests of codons under positive selection. Here I discuss several errors of statistics in the analysis of Hughes and Friedman, including confusion of statistics with parameters, arbitrary data filtering, and derivation of hypotheses from data. I also apply likelihood ratio tests of positive selection to the yeast data and illustrate empirically that Hughes and Friedman's criticisms on such tests are not valid.
Key Words: genome evolution • likelihood ratio test • nonsynonymous substitution • positive selection • synonymous substitution
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Donmez, G. A. Bazykin, M. Brudno, and A. S. Kondrashov Polymorphism Due to Multiple Amino Acid Substitutions at a Codon Site Within Ciona savignyi Genetics, February 1, 2009; 181(2): 685 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Jancek, S. Gourbiere, H. Moreau, and G. Piganeau Clues about the Genetic Basis of Adaptation Emerge from Comparing the Proteomes of Two Ostreococcus Ecotypes (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae) Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2293 - 2300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-S. Shiao, B.-Y. Liao, M. Long, and H.-T. Yu Adaptive Evolution of the Insulin Two-Gene System in Mouse Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1683 - 1691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. P. Denning and M. F. Rexach Rapid Evolution Exposes the Boundaries of Domain Structure and Function in Natively Unfolded FG Nucleoporins Mol. Cell. Proteomics, February 1, 2007; 6(2): 272 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|