Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 3, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(11):2072-2080; doi:10.1093/molbev/msl076
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/11/2072    most recent
msl076v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liao, B.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liao, B.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Impacts of Gene Essentiality, Expression Pattern, and Gene Compactness on the Evolutionary Rate of Mammalian Proteins

Ben-Yang Liao*, Nicole M. Scott{dagger} and Jianzhi Zhang*

* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan
{dagger} Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan

E-mail: jianzhi{at}umich.edu.

Understanding the determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution is of fundamental importance in evolutionary biology. Many recent studies have focused on the yeast because of the availability of many genome-wide expressional and functional data. Yeast studies revealed a predominant role of gene expression level and a minor role of gene essentiality in determining the rate of protein sequence evolution. Whether these rules apply to complex organisms such as mammals is unclear. Here we assemble a list of 1,138 essential and 2,341 nonessential mouse genes based on targeted gene deletion experiments and report a significant impact of gene essentiality on the rate of mammalian protein evolution. Gene expression level has virtually no effect, although tissue specificity in expression pattern has a strong influence. Unexpectedly, gene compactness, measured by average intron size and untranslated region length, has the greatest influence. Hence, the relative importance of the various factors in determining the rate of mammalian protein evolution is gene compactness > gene essentiality {approx} tissue specificity > expression level. Our results suggest a considerable variation in rate determinants between unicellular organisms such as the yeast and multicellular organisms such as mammals.

Key Words: evolutionary rate • gene essentiality • tissue specificity • expression level • gene compactness • mammals


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B.-Y. Liao and J. Zhang
Null mutations in human and mouse orthologs frequently result in different phenotypes
PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 6987 - 6992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. M. Andres, C. de Hemptinne, and J. Bertranpetit
Heterogeneous Rate of Protein Evolution in Serotonin Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2707 - 2715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant CellHome page
N. Georgelis, E. L. Braun, J. R. Shaw, and L. C. Hannah
The Two AGPase Subunits Evolve at Different Rates in Angiosperms, yet They Are Equally Sensitive to Activity-Altering Amino Acid Changes When Expressed in Bacteria
PLANT CELL, May 1, 2007; 19(5): 1458 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.