MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 4, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(11):2039-2048; doi:10.1093/molbev/msl081
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Protein Evolution Is Faster Outside the Cell
* Division of Matrix Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, SCFAB, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
E-mail: karinjul{at}sbc.su.se.
Some proteins are highly conserved across all species, whereas others diverge significantly even between closely related species. Attempts have been made to correlate the rate of protein evolution to amino acid composition, protein dispensability, and the number of protein–protein interactions, but in all cases, conflicting studies have shown that the theories are hard to confirm experimentally. The only correlation that is undisputed so far is that highly/broadly expressed proteins seem to evolve at a lower rate. Consequently, it has been suggested that correlations between evolution rate and factors like protein dispensability or the number of protein–protein interactions could be just secondary effects due to differences in expression. The purpose of this study was to analyze mammalian proteins/genes with known subcellular location for variations in evolution rates. We show that proteins that are exported (extracellular proteins) evolve faster than proteins that reside inside the cell (intracellular proteins). We find weak, but significant, correlations between evolution rates and expression levels, percentage of tissues in which the proteins are expressed (expression broadness), and the number of protein interaction partners. More important, we show that the observed difference in evolution rate between extra- and intracellular proteins is largely independent of expression levels, expression broadness, and the number of protein–protein interactions. We also find that the difference is not caused by an overrepresentation of immunological proteins or disulfide bridge–containing proteins among the extracellular data set. We conclude that the subcellular location of a mammalian protein has a larger effect on its evolution rate than any of the other factors studied in this paper, including expression levels/patterns. We observe a difference in evolution rates between extracellular and intracellular proteins for a yeast data set as well and again show that it is completely independent of expression levels.
Key Words: evolution rate • subcellular localization • expression level • protein connectivity • immunological protein • disulfide bridge
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Oberai, N. H. Joh, F. K. Pettit, and J. U. Bowie Structural imperatives impose diverse evolutionary constraints on helical membrane proteins PNAS, October 20, 2009; 106(42): 17747 - 17750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Heger, C. P. Ponting, and I. Holmes Accurate Estimation of Gene Evolutionary Rates Using XRATE, with an Application to Transmembrane Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2009; 26(8): 1715 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Jancek, S. Gourbiere, H. Moreau, and G. Piganeau Clues about the Genetic Basis of Adaptation Emerge from Comparing the Proteomes of Two Ostreococcus Ecotypes (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae) Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2293 - 2300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Dean, J. M. Good, and M. W. Nachman Adaptive Evolution of Proteins Secreted during Sperm Maturation: An Analysis of the Mouse Epididymal Transcriptome Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 383 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|