MBE Advance Access originally published online on September 21, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(1):212-226; doi:10.1093/molbev/msj024
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Bayesian Estimation of Species Divergence Times Under a Molecular Clock Using Multiple Fossil Calibrations with Soft Bounds

* Department of Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; and
Genome Center, University of California, Davis
E-mail: bhrannala{at}ucdavis.edu.
We implement a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for estimating species divergence times that uses heterogeneous data from multiple gene loci and accommodates multiple fossil calibration nodes. A birth-death process with species sampling is used to specify a prior for divergence times, which allows easy assessment of the effects of that prior on posterior time estimates. We propose a new approach for specifying calibration points on the phylogeny, which allows the use of arbitrary and flexible statistical distributions to describe uncertainties in fossil dates. In particular, we use soft bounds, so that the probability that the true divergence time is outside the bounds is small but nonzero. A strict molecular clock is assumed in the current implementation, although this assumption may be relaxed. We apply our new algorithm to two data sets concerning divergences of several primate species, to examine the effects of the substitution model and of the prior for divergence times on Bayesian time estimation. We also conduct computer simulation to examine the differences between soft and hard bounds. We demonstrate that divergence time estimation is intrinsically hampered by uncertainties in fossil calibrations, and the error in Bayesian time estimates will not go to zero with increased amounts of sequence data. Our analyses of both real and simulated data demonstrate potentially large differences between divergence time estimates obtained using soft versus hard bounds and a general superiority of soft bounds. Our main findings are as follows. (1) When the fossils are consistent with each other and with the molecular data, and the posterior time estimates are well within the prior bounds, soft and hard bounds produce similar results. (2) When the fossils are in conflict with each other or with the molecules, soft and hard bounds behave very differently; soft bounds allow sequence data to correct poor calibrations, while poor hard bounds are impossible to overcome by any amount of data. (3) Soft bounds eliminate the need for "safe" but unrealistically high upper bounds, which may bias posterior time estimates. (4) Soft bounds allow more reliable assessment of estimation errors, while hard bounds generate misleadingly high precisions when fossils and molecules are in conflict.
Key Words: Bayesian method MCMC divergence times molecular clock
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. M. Sallam, E. R. Seiffert, M. E. Steiper, and E. L. Simons Fossil and molecular evidence constrain scenarios for the early evolutionary and biogeographic history of hystricognathous rodents PNAS, September 29, 2009; 106(39): 16722 - 16727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lartillot, T. Lepage, and S. Blanquart PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating Bioinformatics, September 1, 2009; 25(17): 2286 - 2288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Sennblad and J. Lagergren Probabilistic Orthology Analysis Syst Biol, August 18, 2009; (2009) syp046v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. W. Ho and M. J. Phillips Accounting for Calibration Uncertainty in Phylogenetic Estimation of Evolutionary Divergence Times Syst Biol, July 3, 2009; (2009) syp035v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dornburg, F. Santini, and M. E. Alfaro The Influence of Model Averaging on Clade Posteriors: An Example Using the Triggerfishes (Family Balistidae) Syst Biol, December 1, 2008; 57(6): 905 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J Peterson, J. A Cotton, J. G Gehling, and D. Pisani The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1435 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J Swalla and A. B Smith Deciphering deuterostome phylogeny: molecular, morphological and palaeontological perspectives Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1557 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Riddle, M. N. Dawson, E. A. Hadly, D. J. Hafner, M. J. Hickerson, S. J. Mantooth, and A. D. Yoder The role of molecular genetics in sculpting the future of integrative biogeography Progress in Physical Geography, April 1, 2008; 32(2): 173 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jian, P. S. Soltis, M. A. Gitzendanner, M. J. Moore, R. Li, T. A. Hendry, Y.-L. Qiu, A. Dhingra, C. D. Bell, and D. E. Soltis Resolving an Ancient, Rapid Radiation in Saxifragales Syst Biol, February 1, 2008; 57(1): 38 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lepage, D. Bryant, H. Philippe, and N. Lartillot A General Comparison of Relaxed Molecular Clock Models Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2669 - 2680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Liow and N. C. Stenseth The rise and fall of species: implications for macroevolutionary and macroecological studies Proc R Soc B, November 7, 2007; 274(1626): 2745 - 2752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Britton, C. L. Anderson, D. Jacquet, S. Lundqvist, and K. Bremer Estimating Divergence Times in Large Phylogenetic Trees Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 741 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Hugall, R. Foster, and M. S. Y. Lee Calibration Choice, Rate Smoothing, and the Pattern of Tetrapod Diversification According to the Long Nuclear Gene RAG-1 Syst Biol, August 1, 2007; 56(4): 543 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yang PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1586 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Hug and A. J. Roger The Impact of Fossils and Taxon Sampling on Ancient Molecular Dating Analyses Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1889 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. SMITH Marine diversity through the Phanerozoic: problems and prospects Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 2007; 164(4): 731 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Rannala and Z. Yang Inferring Speciation Times under an Episodic Molecular Clock Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 453 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Smith Intrinsic versus extrinsic biases in the fossil record: contrasting the fossil record of echinoids in the Triassic and early Jurassic using sampling data, phylogenetic analysis, and molecular clocks Paleobiology, March 1, 2007; 33(2): 310 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Willyard, J. Syring, D. S. Gernandt, A. Liston, and R. Cronn Fossil Calibration of Molecular Divergence Infers a Moderate Mutation Rate and Recent Radiations for Pinus Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 90 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Benton and P. C. J. Donoghue Paleontological Evidence to Date the Tree of Life Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 26 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||








