MBE Advance Access originally published online on June 1, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(9):1813-1822; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi173
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Analysis of Acorus calamus Chloroplast Genome and Its Phylogenetic Implications
* Institut für Spezielle Botanik, Universität Jena, Jena, Germany; Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; Zentrum Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
E-mail: vadim.goremykin{at}uni-jena.de.
Determining the phylogenetic relationships among the major lines of angiosperms is a long-standing problem, yet the uncertainty as to the phylogenetic affinity of these lines persists. While a number of studies have suggested that the ANITA (Amborella-Nymphaeales-Illiciales-Trimeniales-Aristolochiales) grade is basal within angiosperms, studies of complete chloroplast genome sequences also suggested an alternative tree, wherein the line leading to the grasses branches first among the angiosperms. To improve taxon sampling in the existing chloroplast genome data, we sequenced the chloroplast genome of the monocot Acorus calamus. We generated a concatenated alignment (89,436 positions for 15 taxa), encompassing almost all sequences usable for phylogeny reconstruction within spermatophytes. The data still contain support for both the ANITA-basal and grasses-basal hypotheses. Using simulations we can show that were the ANITA-basal hypothesis true, parsimony (and distance-based methods with many models) would be expected to fail to recover it. The self-evident explanation for this failure appears to be a long-branch attraction (LBA) between the clade of grasses and the out-group. However, this LBA cannot explain the discrepancies observed between tree topology recovered using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and the topologies recovered using the parsimony and distance-based methods when grasses are deleted. Furthermore, the fact that neither maximum parsimony nor distance methods consistently recover the ML tree, when according to the simulations they would be expected to, when the out-group (Pinus) is deleted, suggests that either the generating tree is not correct or the best symmetric model is misspecified (or both). We demonstrate that the tree recovered under ML is extremely sensitive to model specification and that the best symmetric model is misspecified. Hence, we remain agnostic regarding phylogenetic relationships among basal angiosperm lineages.
Key Words: Acorus calamus • chloroplast genomes • angiosperms • gymnosperms • molecular evolution • systematic phylogenetic error
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. W. Graham and W. J. D. Iles Different gymnosperm outgroups have (mostly) congruent signal regarding the root of flowering plant phylogeny Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 216 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. K. Jansen, Z. Cai, L. A. Raubeson, H. Daniell, C. W. dePamphilis, J. Leebens-Mack, K. F. Muller, M. Guisinger-Bellian, R. C. Haberle, A. K. Hansen, et al. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19369 - 19374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Shavit, D. Penny, M. D. Hendy, and B. R. Holland The Problem of Rooting Rapid Radiations Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2400 - 2411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. A. Matsen and M. Steel Phylogenetic Mixtures on a Single Tree Can Mimic a Tree of Another Topology Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 767 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. White, S. Hills, R Gaddam, B. Holland, and D. Penny Treeness Triangles: Visualizing the Loss of Phylogenetic Signal Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2029 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-S. Wu, Y.-N. Wang, S.-M. Liu, and S.-M. Chaw Chloroplast Genome (cpDNA) of Cycas taitungensis and 56 cp Protein-Coding Genes of Gnetum parvifolium: Insights into cpDNA Evolution and Phylogeny of Extant Seed Plants Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 1366 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Bateman, J. Hilton, and P. J. Rudall Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2006; 57(13): 3471 - 3503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Turmel, C. Otis, and C. Lemieux The Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Chara vulgaris Sheds New Light into the Closest Green Algal Relatives of Land Plants Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2006; 23(6): 1324 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. R. Holland, L. S. Jermiin, and V. Moulton Improved Consensus Network Techniques for Genome-Scale Phylogeny Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 848 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-C. Chang, H.-C. Lin, I-P. Lin, T.-Y. Chow, H.-H. Chen, W.-H. Chen, C.-H. Cheng, C.-Y. Lin, S.-M. Liu, C.-C. Chang, et al. The Chloroplast Genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Rate with that of Grasses and Its Phylogenetic Implications Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 279 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Cui, N. Veeraraghavan, A. Richter, K. Wall, R. K. Jansen, J. Leebens-Mack, I. Makalowska, and C. W. dePamphilis ChloroplastDB: the Chloroplast Genome Database Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D692 - D696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|